Now that you are getting personal again (How many of you are here anyways?)
You are confused mate. Pointing out obvious flaws in the theories that you sprout is NOT the same thing as getting personal!
I said earlier that the link is not my primary base of conclusion; someone asked for a reference and I just threw in some I can obviously say that 100% is not accurate. Which history is?
Integra,
Lets be honest here. You failed to find a single link to support the claim that you made. Is it really tough to admit when ones totally wrong?
The pala dynasty or the first representative was elected here and it was one of the first democratic elections in south Asia. The kingdom was based around this place. No war was needed.
I definitely cant prove where the candidate came from but the kingdom was here without the need of war.
well, well, well.... one more theory.... but this time I wont dare to ask you to prove it and get accused of being a troll! Lets say you are wrong by a few centuries!
One of my friend was born Irani but hes a Bangladeshi citizen so wots the big deal? If you claim that your history is the most acurate than I'm not interested because none is.
I dont remember claiming that my history is accurate. But first claiming something that sounded like Alexander had war with a Bengali entity, supplying no evidence when asked for one and then backing out the way you did... lets say you did not come out with flying colours!
And can someone pls remove the troll above?
You surely arent interested in getting your facts right! And this is what you get into when you make absurd claims! What did you expect? Folks to congratulate you on making up theories? There are candidates far better than you in this regard... Best of luck in beating the competetion!!