What's new

India, US set to ink $1.4bn deal for 22 Apache helicopters

China with indigenous high tech manufactoring capability can smash a country that needs to import ammo - FACT

As long as we make sure you also have significant loss we are good. China is businessmen they will not attack.
 
China with indigenous high tech manufactoring capability can smash a country that needs to import ammo - FACT

Few days back you offered choppers to us but ur so called modern choppers were obsolete :enjoy: and we rejected dem
 
That is unconfirmed news from Russia.

AND ONE MORE FACT FOR YOU..
God_53f447_2773445.jpg
 
64 million dollars apiece?

How much does an F-15 cost?

What was the original price tag for an F-35?

Indians pay top dollars for expensive toys,with the result that tens of thousands of children will be frozen out of schooling

1 AH-64D costs around $18 million, the $1.4billion includes radars, armaments and everything else.
So keep your wet dreams to yourselves no need to share it with every one.


22 Apaches is barely enough for a training regiment -- never mind confronting a superpower that manufactures its own combat helicopter like China!

http://www.defence.pk/forums/chinese-defence/90506-china-wz-10-pics.html

It's just military jargon. Means making full use of datalinks.

R:rofl:FL:rofl:L

Are you seriously comparing WZ-10 to Apache?
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
China with indigenous high tech manufactoring capability can smash a country that needs to import ammo - FACT


Mr Han Your Factual Stupidity speaks Volumes in each comment you Post.

Your AVIATION is Based on Russian Engines
Your Navy is Based on Russian /French Systems Copied.
Your Foto-copy Industry is based on Forging and infringement of INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Rights.
Your Latest Tin-cans are Copy of F22/F35 Read in Respected Military Groups like MilitaryPhotos.net Comments onthe same, if you need help to wake up let me know.


Your Victor in 1962 was on an Army of STRENGTH 80,000 against 1.2 Million. Thanks to your Nation for Waking us up, we gave back in 65 to Pakistan and Took Back in 71. Had there been no 62, we would have lost much more land to PAKISTAN. Thanks again Great Power.


FYI Japanese Air Chief was recently in India post visit from Japanese Defence Minister.
Your Defat by Vietnam/ Your Defeat by Russia/Your Defeat by JAPAN is Monumental.

With Japan Rising Chinese are having Doubts rember, Recent artilces in Peoples Daily are Good Examples.

An injury always Haunts like 62 to us and Nanjing Masscare and Japanese Ruthlessness to Entire China. Japan will rule SOuth China Sea once again wait for 5 more years.

Your scholar Sun TZU has said a Powerful force needs to be Humble and ignorant is Prowdy!!

Dont be a Sunny JIM AGAIN.
 
That is unconfirmed news from Russia.

:rofl: even our LCH is better then wz-10 , feel free to compare spac. :rofl: that 5+ ton junk is powered by only 2*1000 kw , and can carry only 1500 kg of payload:lol: thats not world class at all son. our LCH is just 2.5 ton and powered by 2*1070kw , and can carry 3000+ kg. first u need to learn then come here on PDF.
 
Great deal for US, US sure knows how to maximize it's profits. :tup:
 
Hi guys getting some intresting news, word is that India want another 80 of these beast and the US is keen to do business.

Pakistan have aslso asked for the Apache and the US has said no way to them.

Now there is some other rumour going around that Israel wants the USA to join it and India in R&D but not just in weapons but across the board, Israel is pushing the cause keenly with the Americians.

Not sure if this is just gossip, but if India are interested in another 80 Apaches what are India going to use them for?
 
953_453330948046866_1825137938_n.jpg

Today, RNLAF AH-64D Q-17, the demo Apache, was spotted with additional markings to celebrate 100 years of military aviation in the Netherlands next year!
 
The money could had better spent on sanitation and clean water. Millions die due to diarrhoea and colera in India every year. Another loss for humanity.
 
Back
Top Bottom