Your point was about bringing toilets and poverty. Only the british media does that, not the entire western media.Both are same when it comes to bashing india and pitching us against chna
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your point was about bringing toilets and poverty. Only the british media does that, not the entire western media.Both are same when it comes to bashing india and pitching us against chna
yep buddy... i agree @KAL-ELmate@KAL-EL is a sensible and reasonable American who always brings something new to the table.please don't confuse him with @faithfulguy,he has never bashed India rather his posts are quite sensible and mature....
Mate i saw many western posts. i dont have the energy to post them now...Your point was about bringing toilets and poverty. Only the british media does that, not the entire western media.
Thank you for just making my point about "painting with a broad brush" As I personally never commented on those topics, let alone brought any of them up. Yet, because others might have, you lumped me in with them? Then you say "You guys are ignorant and jealous." Who are "you guys?" Again, lumping everyone in. Grow up and stop throwing a tantrum. That is all![]()
I thought the Indian Government was angry with Murica![]()
I was thinking the same but seems Indian anger is for media and public consumption only and other ways which can pull American beard more vigorously are ignored. If India had put condition that next 6 aircrafts will be ordered if ... then situation would've been different.
Why would you put a condition on your purchases......not buying anything would be a better strategy.If India had put condition that next 6 aircrafts will be ordered if ... then situation would've been different.
Why would you put a condition on your purchases......not buying anything would be a better strategy.
The next things needed in order of urgency for IAF for a high tempo operation are actually
1. MRTT
2. AWACS
I wonder when the deals for these two would be signed. MoD needs to fast track these acquisitions.
Probably the repeat C-130 deal was signed so fast because of American pressure.Exactly, if the deal for such simple transport aircrafts took so long, how long will those far more important procurements of AWACS and Tankers will take then?
I agree. This timidity of thought of MoD is amusing. Piece meal orders not only mess with the induction schedule, they also give increased opportunities for corruption to everyone.And can IAF please stop this nonsense of procuring them in low numbers only, instead of ordering the really required number directly! We still have no follow orders of EMB 145 DRDO AWACS, which is disastrous for our detection capabilities towards China and Pakistan.
lol why yes of course! Enough bashing to still do a one billion dollar deal with evil AmericaYou know, I could lower myself and find reasons to 'bash' India. but then... I pride myself on being much more civilized than that. Not to mention the fact that I've learned it is best not to "paint with a broad brush" about a civilization. but hey, you go on right ahead and keep throwing your anti-American tantrum all over PDF.
6 tankers - Russian - with a maintainability of 50%- for a fleet of over 200 high performance aircraft is downright ridiculous. They wont be able to cover 2 fronts.
Secondly, AWACS. God knows why IAF is not pressurizing at the very least 2 more Phalcons in the interim. I get that DRDO AWACS should be supported. By again 3 AWACS - again based on Il platform(though a newer one with PS-90) is beyond low even for one front, let alone two. They need atleast 6 Phalcons supported by DRDO EMB based ones.
I agree. This timidity of thought of MoD is amusing. Piece meal orders not only mess with the induction schedule, they also give increased opportunities for corruption to everyone.