What's new

UK MP says demand of Sikhs for Khalistan protected in UN charter

. .
If independent khalistan is a "no reason" for u then we are ready to loose few sq kms for this "no reason".

It is for no reason. Lol

Punjab CM Hails Canada's Move of Not Recognizing 'Referendum 2020' by Pro-Khalistan Group

Also Britain would never entertain such nonsense.

Read carefully. If and when Khalistan is carved out of Bhaktistan, then kartarpur could be given over. I wouldn't mind.

Speaking of losing a few sq kms for no reason, India seems to be an expert in this of late.

Please I won't engage cheerleaders of no worth.
 
. .
.
I usually dont argue with dumb indians who lack basic comprehension skills. Are u guys trained to become stupid or are u guys born that way?

I suggest you go ahead with your dumb idea, which would result in nothing but just a loss of few sq kms of Pakistan. It is your prerogative to be as dumb as you want.
 
.
I suggest you go ahead with your dumb idea, which would result in nothing but just a loss of few sq kms of Pakistan. It is your prerogative to be as dumb as you want.

Yup nothing but loss of few sq kms of Pakistan territory and an independent khalistan carved out of india. As i suspected, its by birth.
If any country truely wants to learn how to lose territory for "no reason", they should ask modi.
 
.
Yup nothing but loss of few sq kms of Pakistan territory and an independent khalistan carved out of india. As i suspected, its by birth.
If any country truely wants to learn how to lose territory for "no reason", they should ask modi.

Lol. Pakistan support for Khalistan would be death knell for that movement. I suggest you to stop talking and work towards that dumb idea which would infact benefit India. Thanks in advance.
 
.
Pakistan should not mind giving a few Acres of their territory for a greater cause. Some even suggested giving a few acres of Janam Asthan(nankana sahib) to the state of Khalistan and get them a seat in the UN, same as the Vatican.
 
Last edited:
.
What pain? Dumb mullah having comprehension issues now? I suggested you to go ahead with your dumb plan.

Wow u just wont stop embarrassing urself would u? The thing that makes u indian unique morons is that u ppl are so confident and consistent in ur stupidity. Its like u rats are not only utterly ugly stupid but u guys think ur smart. Seeing a dumb lackey whinning shows modi will have diarrhea once we officially announce it.
Remember ur on a Pakistani forum and dont overstay ur welcome u ugly rat.
 
.
Lol. Why get personal now camel jockey?

Given your verbal diatribe, I think you understood what stupid idea it was in the first place only now and are lashing out because I called you out for your stupidity. Lol.

Its u who got personal first u ugly rat. Its evident how much pain it caused u. Maybe too much cowpiss have destroyed ur brains. U cant even comprehend basic things. Dont quote me again u ugly cowpiss rat or ill squeeze u back in the hole u came out of.
 
. .
Responding to his claim, Labour MP Preet Kaul Gill wrote in reference to the demands of Sikhs for a separate homeland of Khalistan that “the principle of self-determination is prominently embodied in Article I of the Charter of the United Nations”.

The honourable Member of Parliament from Birmingham Edgbaston added: “It is positioned as the first right in the twin Human Rights Covenants (the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights [ICCPR] and [ICESCR].”
Gill further clarified that even if Boris Johnson made this claim, he was not above the law. She said: "Not sure what your referring to. I for one am very concerned about the divisive nature of your tweets. The PM is not above the law and it’s clear you don’t understand human rights or the principles of the UN declaration."

If pro-Khalistan supporters can cite UN to back their claim, so can Balochs, Sindhia, and Pashtuns. It's a can of worms nobody wants to open.
 
.
If pro-Khalistan supporters
Army of the future state.
D5e9d7WWwAInEk9.jpg
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom