What's new

Merge Rakhine state (Myanmar) with Bangladesh! - US Congress

It is called "democracy" and that was the point of the 1970 elections dude.

democracy was never defined as majority of tyranny in any pakistani constitution.

education clearly does not mean awareness like your Illusion of liberstion/freedom has shown
 
.
But Pakistan isn't following Islam our politicians religion iman everything is jamhoriyat and the creation of Bangladesh was the best thing happened which to Pakistan

Pakistan has a robust islamic constitution.

Even the crude form of it is islamic.

These people rebelled against the objektive Resolution which directly renders them cursed
 
.
After breaking Pakistan now these Bengalis are dreaming to break Myanmar
 
.
democracy was never defined as majority of tyranny in any pakistani constitution.

education clearly does not mean awareness like your Illusion of liberstion/freedom has shown



Dude, ever lived in a democratic country?

Minority has to accept the rule of the majority. That is the only way societies can function without splitting up.

BD would have dominated Pakistan for 20 years after 1971 and when West Pakistan's population surpassed BD around 1990, it would have bribed one of the smaller provinces to continue it's dominance. As far as BD was concerned that was the only deal on the table.
 
.
Brother please don't use any word that trigger religious debate. Cow cola, cow urine, using such language will cause pain to normal common Hindus because it's actually directed to their religion. And we should refrain from doing so.
Only civilized people understand civilized language. And I didn’t started any abuse here, uncivilized worms of the rape hope of earth did...
 
.
there is no concept of majority ruling minority in islam.

ethnofascism propagated by pseudo intellectuals from Dhaka University Harping marxist ideologies helped the indian crusade against Pakistan
there was concept of Chilaphet in Islam.. You should had joined ISIS...
ohh yea half of your country already did.
 
. .
Dude, ever lived in a democratic country?

Minority has to accept the rule of the majority. That is the only way societies can function without splitting up.

BD would have dominated Pakistan for 20 years after 1971 and when West Pakistan's population surpassed BD around 1990, it would have bribed one of the smaller provinces to continue it's dominance. As far as BD was concerned that was the only deal on the table.

I honestly have little patience for your fascist rememberance of history.

i have no problems painting you as terrorists fascist or genocidical tyrants wishing extermination of rohingyas keeping them in Camps and sterilizing them for Population control.

there was concept of Chilaphet in Islam.. You should had joined ISIS...
ohh yea half of your country already did.

Hahaha you would regret the irony of this in 1 year.
 
.
. .
Dude, ever lived in a democratic country?

Minority has to accept the rule of the majority. That is the only way societies can function without splitting up.

BD would have dominated Pakistan for 20 years after 1971 and when West Pakistan's population surpassed BD around 1990, it would have bribed one of the smaller provinces to continue it's dominance. As far as BD was concerned that was the only deal on the table.
There was no majority minority thing.. 30% bengali voted against AL in 1970 election. In the next election Bhutto could had become PM of PK, pretty much with bengali vote. Pakistan never gave democracy a chance to begin with.
Another burning issue with Pakistan was the protection of the minorities. Creation of Bangladesh at least saved a major part of our minorities.
 
. .
Minority has to accept the rule of the majority. That is the only way societies can function without splitting up.

It wasn't applicable in case of Pakistan as west Pakistan was many times larger compared to Bangal and was richer compared to Bangal on the other hand Bangal just had population nothing else no resources no land etc
This union was artificial and creation of Bangladesh was the best thing happened to Pakistan
 
.
There was no majority minority thing.. 30% bengali voted against AL in 1970 election. In the next election Bhutto could had become PM of PK, pretty much with bengali vote. Pakistan never gave democracy a chance to begin with.


Nope as AL had the all the seats of East Pakistan which were more than West Pakistan combined. They were set to form the government but West Pakistan government had no intention of giving power to Bengalis.

As long as East Pakistan had more population than West Pakistan, it could keep ruling Pakistan by itself. Once the demographics changed then easy to bribe one of the smaller West Pakistan provinces to keep Bengali domination going.
 
.
Dont cry after acting stronk. Those are replies against you and your countrymans stronk claims...

but there is a signifikant hindu Population as well in Bangladesh.

your polarized Country needs democracy and it will be given to it.

glorious shall be wrath of God upon Mukti Bahanis creed and caste
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom