What's new

Merge Rakhine state (Myanmar) with Bangladesh! - US Congress

Why not merge Assam with Bangladesh. Everyone knows that villages and town of Assam have full of Bangladeshi people. This makes Assam a natural Bangladeshi territory. At the time of British rule British allows Bangalis to migrate and settle in Assam that's why Assam have so many Bangalis living there. In near future Indian will lose Assam to Bangladeshi people.
Not really it was during the British period. Bengali settlement started after the failed invasion of Bakhtiar Khilji in 1205. He lost the battle but it paved the way for our people in Rangpur and Mymensingh to go, occupy a few patches of land for cultivation and settle in the western Assam although sovereignty lied with the King of Assam.

It was something like a person has four sons, one or two would finally settle in Assam and the other two would remain in their native Bengal. Assam was not dense with population, even Bengal was not that populated but there are other events afterward including those in the British time to cause a slow migration of Bengali Muslims to western Assam.

And now the Indian brats in PDF say they are Bangladeshis. Very illiterate and stupid guys without a trace of knowledge in history. Always blabbering with an evil mind.

Bangladeshis are those illegals that pole vault over the barbed fence to gain entry to India and we will do everything in our might to send them packing.
No, the illegal Bangladeshis are those 1.1 million people who board Moitree Express trains to go to a country called poor India and decide to stay in the Bombay and other slums scattered all over it. However, I do not know exactly why your govt should give them a red carpet welcome at the border? Oh!! Is it because your poor country gets a lot of dollar money from them?
 
Drink some cow jaal and calm down.
Interesting that it is coming from someone who licked boots for 1000 years ! Indian Peace Keeping Force ( IPKF ) got kicked out of Sri Lanka by the LTTE, the same LTTE created, trained and armed by India. The same LTTE later blew the head off Rajiv Gandhi IN INDIA.

Your kind won't be able to shoot a fish in a fish barrel !
Do Bharat don't have already enough enemy? These filthy internet Hindu think they can over power Bangladesh at easy. These rats forget where Bangladesh is sitting. They look at our current armed forces and think, look they are so much weak then us. So it will be easy to attack them. But these scum do not understand, the iron will of 17 crore people to defend the motherland is more powerful than any forces they can master against Bangladesh. These rats also should read some account of 1971 war, when they entered Bangladesh. Even a small, under supplied, demoralized, besieged Pakistani army operating in a hostile territory were able to put stiff resistance in many places by taking advantage of our riverine landscape.

Just because Awami League play nice with them they think we have no other way. They think Bangladesh is like another Bhutan or Nepal, they can boss around. But these filthy internet Hindus should remember, we are being nice to them is not our weakness, but our good gesture. They should better respect it.
 
Last edited:
Why not merge Assam with Bangladesh. Everyone knows that villages and town of Assam have full of Bangladeshi people. This makes Assam a natural Bangladeshi territory. At the time of British rule British allows Bangalis to migrate and settle in Assam that's why Assam have so many Bangalis living there.In near future Indian will lose Assam to Bangladeshi people.

When Bangladesh was East Bengal many Bengali Muslims from Bangladesh settled in Assam due to Hindu-Muslim fight in Bengal. In 1971 many Bengali Muslims also migrated to Assam due to massacre by Pakistan army and Bangladeshi Razakars. Although atrocities were targeted towards Hindus but Muslims also tried to escape from rape and murder . Assam became natural shelter for them.

They and their generations are now called illegal Bangladeshis in Assam.

Bangladesh has always been problematic territory in British India, mainly due to religious riots. Rohingyas migrated to Burma during British period, Bengali Muslims migrated to Assam and West Bengal since 1947 and also during 1971. Both are now called 'illegal Bangladeshis'.
 
Last edited:
Do Bharat don't have already enough enemy? These filthy internet Hindu think they can over power Bangladesh at easy. These rats forget where Bangladesh is sitting. They look at our current armed forces and think, look they are so much weak then us. So it will be easy to attack them. But these scum do not understand, the iron will of 17 crore people to defend the motherland is more powerful than any forces they can master against Bangladesh. These rats also should read some account of 1971 war, when they entered Bangladesh. Even a small, under supplied, demoralized, besieged Pakistani army operating in a hostile territory were able to put stiff resistance in many places by taking advantage of our riverine landscape.

Just because Awami League play nice with them they think we have no other way. They think Bangladesh is like another Bhutan or Nepal, they can boss around. But these filthy internet Hindus should remember, we are being nice to them is not our weakness, but our good gesture. They should better respect it.
Who trained Bengali Mukti Bahinis???u were better under your Punjabi masters
Bangladesh is enjoying this 10% growth rate only because u don't have a hostile enemy . You make fun of Pakistan's current situation
But if it would have been Bangladesh in place of Pakistan u all would have jumped in Bay of Bengal. A single Naval blockade is enough to cripple stronk Bangladesh , no one will come to help while Pakistan and Myanmar will watch eating popcorns or even they both might take part in the party. Its because of surrender , Mujib was freed by Pakistan and it was India who gave asylum to Hasina bibi yet u ungrateful lots talk about taking Indian land.
You are lucky that you guys are not facing any insurgencies like India , Pak or Myanmar

When Bangladesh was East Bengal many Bengali Muslims from Bangladesh settled in Assam due to Hindu-Muslim fight in Bengal. In 1971 many Bengali Muslims also migrated to Assam due to massacre by Pakistan army and Bangladeshi Razakars. Although atrocities were targeted towards Hindus but Muslims also tried to escape from rape and murder . Assam became natural shelter for them.

They and their generations are now called illegal Bangladeshis in Assam.

Bangladesh has always been problematic territory in British India, mainly due to religious riots. Rohingyas migrated to Burma during British period, Bengali Muslims migrated to Assam and West Bengal since 1947 and also during 1971. Both are now called 'illegal Bangladeshis'.
Talk facts , Bangladeshis that came before 1971 are all legals , only those who are migrating from golden Bangladesh post 1971 will be kicked out
 
Who trained Bengali Mukti Bahinis???u were better under your Punjabi slaves
India provided for it's own interest. that's it.

But you should not delude yourself with the thinking that Bangladesh could not have emerged Independent if India had not helped. We would have been independent even if India were neutral. There is noway 45,000 Pakistani troops could have subdued a country of 75 million perpetually. Our independence would have come India or not, if not in 1971, then in 1972, or 1973 or 1974. After Pakistani army launched operation search light and Bangladesh declared Independence, there was no way to go back to remain as a single country with Pakistan. We have 86,000 villages. We had more villages then they could master the number of troops. Vast swath of the countryside was out of reach for Pakistani troops and Mukti Bahini reigned there. Securing weapons from black market was never too difficult. Even without Indian involvement, a less intense insurgency would have still raged on. Pakistan's economy was crippled and they were unable to withstand any prolonged insurgency in Bangladesh. Sooner or later, they would have forced to come with the negotiation with provisional Bangladesh govt. and would have to give independence on negotiated terms. Indian direct involvement only hasten the inevitable outcome.

But you guys are not grateful towards us that we have saved you from the 'Pakistan in the East' by breaking away from Pakistan. Can you imagine what would have been now if there were nuclear armed hostile East Pakistan in your eastern sides still?
 
Last edited:
India provided for it's own interest. that's it.

But you should not delude yourself with the thinking that Bangladesh could not have emerged Independent if India had not helped. We would have been independent even if India were neutral. There is noway 45,000 Pakistani troops could have subdued a country of 75 million perpetually. Our independence would have come India or not, if not in 1971, then in 1972, or 1973 or 1974. After Pakistani army launched operation search light and Bangladesh declared Independence. There was no way to go back to remain as a single country with Pakistan. We have 86,000 villages. We had more villages then they could master the number of troops. Vast swath of the countryside was out of reach for Pakistani troops and Mukti Bahini reigned there. Securing weapons from black market was never too difficult. Even without Indian involvement, a less intense insurgency would have still raged on. Pakistan's economy was crippled and they were unable to withstand any prolonged insurgency in Bangladesh. Sooner or later, they would have forced to come with the negotiation with provisional Bangladesh govt. and would have to give independence on negotiated terms. Indian direct involvement only hasten the inevitable outcome.

But you guys are not grateful enough to us that we saved you from the 'Pakistan in the East' by breaking away from Pakistan. Can you imagine what would have been now if there were nuclear armed East Pakistan in your eastern sides?
So what was the need for Indian army to intervene?we did and they surrendered in what 13 days -one of the smallest war yet biggest surrender post world war
Yes i agree Mukti Bahinis would have eventually won but there would have been more bloodshed and more time taken to achieve independence
Yes i also agree breaking Pakistan was in our favour
But problem here is your wet dreams of annexing Indian lands(which would never happen)
Your constant blabbering about Hindutva and Hinduphobic comments , firstly u need to peep into your own country and see about rising radicalization amongst Bangladeshis, radical islamists are increasing and that is a bigger danger than Hindutva of neighbouring India
Though we favour AL and Haseena bibi but her fascist behaviour is increasing evident from.Bangladeshi elections which were a farce
 
But if it would have been Bangladesh in place of Pakistan u all would have jumped in Bay of Bengal. A single Naval blockade is enough to cripple stronk Bangladesh , no one will come to help while Pakistan and Myanmar will watch eating popcorns or even they both might take part in the party. Its because of surrender , Mujib was freed by Pakistan and it was India who gave asylum to Hasina bibi yet u ungrateful lots talk about taking Indian land.
You are lucky that you guys are not facing any insurgencies like India , Pak or Myanmar
What a delusion. Naval blockade is an act of war. There is noway India can impose naval blockade without directly engaging in warfare. And effect of naval blockade is not immediate. It take several months to feel it's effect for a war economy. Unless war prolonged for many months or years, naval blockade has no effectiveness. And modern warfare do not last that long. And do you think, if there was hostility and threat of war with India, our armed forces would have remained as such? Of course not. It would have been much much powerful enough to frustrate any attempt to blockade.

If Bangladesh India were hostile to each other than Pakistan and China would have been our best buddy. The problem with your thinking is that, you only change half of the equation, but keep remain the other half the same. If India was that a threat to us, then we would have repaired our relation with Myanmar long ago. Improving relation with Myanmar is not difficult for us. We have no territorial issue with them. If we just accept 1 million Rohingyas, Burmese will become friends.
 
Last edited:
India provided for it's own interest. that's it.

But you should not delude yourself with the thinking that Bangladesh could not have emerged Independent if India had not helped. We would have been independent even if India were neutral. There is noway 45,000 Pakistani troops could have subdued a country of 75 million perpetually. Our independence would have come India or not, if not in 1971, then in 1972, or 1973 or 1974. After Pakistani army launched operation search light and Bangladesh declared Independence. There was no way to go back to remain as a single country with Pakistan. We have 86,000 villages. We had more villages then they could master the number of troops. Vast swath of the countryside was out of reach for Pakistani troops and Mukti Bahini reigned there. Securing weapons from black market was never too difficult. Even without Indian involvement, a less intense insurgency would have still raged on. Pakistan's economy was crippled and they were unable to withstand any prolonged insurgency in Bangladesh. Sooner or later, they would have forced to come with the negotiation with provisional Bangladesh govt. and would have to give independence on negotiated terms. Indian direct involvement only hasten the inevitable outcome.

But you guys are not grateful towards us that we saved you from the 'Pakistan in the East' by breaking away from Pakistan. Can you imagine what would have been now if still there were nuclear armed hostile East Pakistan in your eastern sides?

Take note of who says what in threads like this.

At the end of the day, the true enemies of Bangladesh are right wing Hindus and Buddhists.
 
Do Bharat don't have already enough enemy? These filthy internet Hindu think they can over power Bangladesh at easy. These rats forget where Bangladesh is sitting. They look at our current armed forces and think, look they are so much weak then us. So it will be easy to attack them. But these scum do not understand, the iron will of 17 crore people to defend the motherland is more powerful than any forces they can master against Bangladesh. These rats also should read some account of 1971 war, when they entered Bangladesh. Even a small, under supplied, demoralized, besieged Pakistani army operating in a hostile territory were able to put stiff resistance in many places by taking advantage of our riverine landscape.

Just because Awami League play nice with them they think we have no other way. They think Bangladesh is like another Bhutan or Nepal, they can boss around. But these filthy internet Hindus should remember, we are being nice to them is not our weakness, but our good gesture. They should better respect it.

Vegetarians sit at the bottom of the food-chain.
There is a reason why Indian front line soldiers are mostly Sikhs and Gorkhas. Indians do not even trust their own leaf eating kind to fight their wars. Throughout history their battle lines broke running for covers at first sign of hostilities.
It is more than an anomaly.
As you have noticed here these guys are just all talk claiming they will be something someday !
 
What a delusion. Naval blockade is an act of war. There is noway India can impose naval blockade without directly engaging in warfare. And effect of naval blockade is not immediate. It take several months to feel it's effect for a war economy. Unless war prolonged for many months or years, naval blockade has no effectiveness. And modern warfare do not last that long. And do you think, if there was hostility and threat of war with India, our armed forces would have remained as such? Of course not. It would have been much much powerful enough to frustrate any attempt to blockade.

If Bangladesh India were hostile to each other than Pakistan and China would have been our best buddy. The problem with your thinking is that, you only change half of the equation, but keep remain the other half the same. If India was that a threat to us, then we would have repaired our relation with Myanmar long ago. Improving relation with Myanmar is not difficult for us. We have no territorial issue with them. If we just accept 1 million Rohingyas, Burmese will be become friend.
We are not one dreaming about war with Bangladesh , its Bangladeshis PDFers who always bash India and talk about future war with India and dream about annexing our lands

Vegetarians sit at the bottom of the food-chain.
There is a reason why Indian front line soldiers are mostly Sikhs and Gorkhas. Indians do not even trust their own leaf eating kind to fight their wars. Throughout history their battle lines broke running for covers at first sign of hostilities.
It is more than an anomaly.
As you have noticed here these guys are just all talk claiming they will be something someday !
Calm down paper tiger and a keyboard warrior
A single bullet is enough to kill both a vegetarian and a non vegetarian and only 40% indians even less are pure vegetarians
And if u want , compare Virat and Dhoni with any Bangladeshi player lol and btw Virat is vegan and yet physically fit than all your Bangladeshi team combined
So calm down kid and stop boasting Bangladeshi myth or some white supremacist might kick u so hard u might fall directly in Dhaka gutter

Take note of who says what in threads like this.

At the end of the day, the true enemies of Bangladesh are right wing Hindus and Buddhists.
The same guys who assisted you in your independence movement?you look like a BNP supporter
 
We are not one dreaming about war with Bangladesh , its Bangladeshis PDFers who always bash India and talk about future war with India and dream about annexing our lands


Calm down paper tiger and a keyboard warrior
A single bullet is enough to kill both a vegetarian and a non vegetarian and only 40% indians even less are pure vegetarians
And if u want , compare Virat and Dhoni with any Bangladeshi player lol and btw Virat is vegan and yet physically fit than all your Bangladeshi team combined
So calm down kid and stop boasting Bangladeshi myth or some white supremacist might kick u so hard u might fall directly in Dhaka gutter


The same guys who assisted you in your independence movement?you look like a BNP supporter

Wrong.
 
Who trained Bengali Mukti Bahinis???u were better under your Punjabi masters
Bangladesh is enjoying this 10% growth rate only because u don't have a hostile enemy . You make fun of Pakistan's current situation
But if it would have been Bangladesh in place of Pakistan u all would have jumped in Bay of Bengal. A single Naval blockade is enough to cripple stronk Bangladesh , no one will come to help while Pakistan and Myanmar will watch eating popcorns or even they both might take part in the party. Its because of surrender , Mujib was freed by Pakistan and it was India who gave asylum to Hasina bibi yet u ungrateful lots talk about taking Indian land.
You are lucky that you guys are not facing any insurgencies like India , Pak or Myanmar
Hey stupid, instead of blabbering in this forum why do not you ask your Modi Baba to send some troops and test us? But, I ask your IA troops not to die suddenly. I heard many 1971 stories that many of your IA troops died of heart attacks when hearing gunshots. You guys are so coward!!

In 1971 war, our Muktis supported you inside our country. Your coward IA troops were nervous that we will somehow unite with the PA troops and kill them. We were your saviour that is why only a pittance of 1300 IA troops died in 1971.
 
Calm down paper tiger and a keyboard warrior
A single bullet is enough to kill both a vegetarian and a non vegetarian and only 40% indians even less are pure vegetarians
And if u want , compare Virat and Dhoni with any Bangladeshi player lol and btw Virat is vegan and yet physically fit than all your Bangladeshi team combined
So calm down kid and stop boasting Bangladeshi myth or some white supremacist might kick u so hard u might fall directly in Dhaka gutter

Only an Indian can be this stu*id handing over victory on the first salvo !

Shakib scored more runs then your wonder boys Kohli and Dhoni combined in this world cup ! :rofl:

Your wonder-boys Kohli scored 316 runs and Dhoni scored 146 , Shakib scored 476 runs , 25 less than Finch ( highest score ), making Shakib the 2nd highest scorer in this world cup !
https://www.cricketworldcup.com/tournament-stats/most-runs

YOU ARE NOT BRIGHT ENOUGH TO BE AN INTERNET WARRIOR !
 
Only an Indian can be this stu*id handing over victory on the first salvo !

Shakib scored more runs then your wonder boys Kohli and Dhoni combined in this world cup ! :rofl:

Your wonder-boys Kohli scored 316 runs and Dhoni scored 146 , Shakib scored 476 runs , 25 less than Finch ( highest score ), making Shakib the 2nd highest scorer in this world cup !
https://www.cricketworldcup.com/tournament-stats/most-runs

YOU ARE NOT BRIGHT ENOUGH TO BE AN INTERNET WARRIOR !
Stronk India...
 
Now, enjoy the training of Arakan Army. It is better Rakhine becomes independent from the MM occupation force. And the Muslims and Buddhists live there peacefully forever.

 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom