Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

[xenon54 out]

Turkey needs to develop 2500km missiles to hit your capital ? If We had 5000km, It means Turkey would be ahead of Iran in terms of deep striking ability ? What about high res. satellite which is going to feed guidance with images ? What about generation of gidance you use? EW resistance of missiles ?

Its like a d*ck measuring contest, some belive bigger is better, it doesnt matter if it fulfills its purpose.

 

[500]

@500

Sir As Barak 8 has been developed to counter supersonic missiles...do you think that kh 55 poses any threat to your navy...or other targets?

Kh-55 is big and subsonic and very easy target. The only problem that due to low trajectory u can not notice it in time (if there are no AWACS in the air). Plus Kh-55 is not designed to attack ships.

Syria acquired recently supersonic Yakhont anti ship missiles. That means Iran also got them for sure. They are very serious threat to ships.

There was actually proof for Iran having received Kh-55 cruise missiles.

There is not a single proof for this claim. No reports or anything. So why would reports of Iran having acquired Kh-55 missiles come forward, but supposedly other components of other systems not?

You think Ukrainians agreed to sell missiles (wich against the international law) but refused to sell engines (which is not against the international law) ?

 

[TurAr]

People did not say 'it must be'. They made logical arguments about development in technology, which Iran is familiar with, such as avionics, electronics, material used on these systems, etc. For me, if this Soumar has the same capabilities as the original Kh-55, which is likely, then it would be a huge breakthrough for Iran's missile capabilities, and would give Iran significant capabilities in a field which most countries in the world lack.

Only a matter of time before Israeli missile experts give us an update about this new missile. I give more value to their assessments than to yours.

I couldn't see any logical arguments. Besides, with this many unknowns any argument regarding the capabilities of this clone would be no more than empty talk just like how it is on most of the Iranian clones and mock-ups.

@500 Who are these "Israeli missile experts"? Mullah fanboys seem to admire them.

 

[haman10]

Turkey needs to develop 2500km missiles to hit your capital ? If We had 5000km, It means Turkey would be ahead of Iran in terms of deep striking ability ? What about high res. satellite which is going to feed guidance with images ? What about generation of guidance you use? EW resistance of missiles ? What you know about your "copies" that You claim ahead or back of that or this country ?

Its like a d*ck measuring contest, some belive bigger is better, it doesnt matter if it fulfills its purpose.

Did anyone invite you two butthurt here ? did we talk about turkey ? how does this KH-55 cardboard copy even concern 2 trolls in turkey ? when it comes to 500 i get it , its directly pointed at his butt . but you two numbnuts are dancing here for what ?

what d!ck measuring are u talking about ? Turkey is the best of the best . turkey owns everyone . happy now ?

stop posting shyte at every thread in Iranian section now and GTFO here .

You are no one's concern , your section is filled with the same bullcrap that you feed yourselves everyday .

just take a look at this shyte :

"It means Turkey would be ahead of Iran in terms of deep striking ability ? What about high res. satellite which is going to feed guidance with images ? What about generation of guidance you use? EW resistance of missiles ? What you know about your "copies" that You claim ahead or back of that or this country ?"

@Hakan buddy consider our pack revoked

 

[Surenas]

I couldn't see any logical arguments. Besides, with this many unknowns any arguments regarding the capabilities of this clone would be no more than empty talk just like how it is on most of the Iranian clones and mock-ups.

A clone may sound nice, but its a highly effective and deadly weapon system which Iran now manages to produce locally. It doesn't really matter where the technology comes from. Reverse-engineering is still a meticulous and complex industry, which only a handful states in the world have managed to master. Iranian clones of foreign weapon systems hit an Israeli warship in 2006, partially destroyed Israeli tanks in that same war as well, to such extent that they couldn't function on the battlefield anymore.

@500 Who are these "Israeli missile experts"? Mullah fanboys seem to admire them.[/QUOTE]

Go watch these vids, then come back:

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

One more of the many Iranian bullshits. Cardboard and duct tape.

I thought you were banned, buddy; however, it seems this Iranian cruise missile test has waken you up from a deep comma. Whatever the case, this missile from Iran keeps your usurper and apartheid entity (Israel) with deep worries.

 

[Surenas]

You think Ukrainians agreed to sell missiles (wich against the international law) but refused to sell engines (which is not against the international law) ?

They didn't sell all the components, remember, like the warheads? Even if Iran has managed to get some engines, its likely that they have been reverse-engineered as well. Also, you spoke about RK-55 boosters, which Iran has not received, according to open sources.

 

[Bornubus]

A thread about kh 55 is likely to become 'featured'....with nationalistic BS from Atleast 5 countries....

 

[ResurgentIran]

You know its funny. People say that Iran is irrelevant.
Then how is it that a tread about a missile can attract so much attention and generate 19 pages in less than few hours?
Does Iran occupy your mind this much?
Iran seem to be the center of attention in this entire forum. lol

 

[ResurgentIran]

Its hostile to show weapons while Israel cries that iran is warmongering and we try to show the oppossite. How does this build up trust?

Dude, if Iran so much as farts, Israel will sound the alarm bell.
Get a grip of yourselves and stop catering to the apartheid regime.

As a sovereign state, it is fully within Iran's rights to arm itself and deter any agressive moves.

 

[Surenas]

Iran brings Europe within range with new cruise missile

In a development significant both for its timing and its content, Iran unveiled on Sunday a new cruise missile that it claimed would extend the Islamic Republic’s range by 25 percent, placing locales as distant as Budapest, Warsaw, and Athens within striking distance.

[…]

The Soumar missile, as it is known in Iran, is a copy of the Soviet Kh-55, which was stolen from the Ukraine in 2001 and apparently reverse engineered in Iran.

Tal Inbar, the head of space research at the Fisher Institute for Air and Space Strategic Studies, called the new cruise missile and the increased range it represents [2,500 kilometers] “a dramatic shift.”

He said in an email statement that the Soumar, like other cruise missiles, flies at a low altitude, making it hard for radar to detect.

The payload the missile is able to carry is reportedly in the 200-kilogram range, meaning that it is nowhere near capable of delivering a nuclear device.

Nonetheless, it is a significant development, said Inbar, who has monitored the Iranian missile development program for years.

The inclusion of European capitals within Iran’s missile range triggers further discussion about US plans to station missile defense systems in Europe. Russia has long contended that Iranian missiles threaten neither Europe nor the US, Inbar wrote, and therefore it is “a very interesting move — if it was taken without Russian consent.”

Moreover, the unveiling of these new missiles, a decision almost certainly approved by Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenai, taken as the nuclear negotiations reach a pivotal juncture at the end of March, “is a significant signal,” Inbar wrote, “especially in light of the Iranian proclamations that the matter of missiles would not be up for negotiation.”

Iran brings Europe within range with new cruise missile | The Times of Israel

 

[TurAr]

The dreams of the mullah fanboys shatter ones again by those pesky foreigners. The burden of not having anything solid to counter the reasonable questions and criticisms might be too much for them. So as always, they try to dismiss them by trash talking. The past 2 pages of this thread is a perfect example to that which might be used as a reference in the future.

 

[Surenas]

The dreams of the mullah fanboys shatter ones again by those pesky foreigners. The burden of not having anything solid to counter the reasonable questions and criticisms might be too much for them. So as always, they try to dismiss them by trash talking. The past 2 pages of this thread is a perfect example to that which might be used as a reference in the future.

''Tal Inbar, the head of space research at the Fisher Institute for Air and Space Strategic Studies, called the new cruise missile and the increased range it represents [2,500 kilometers] “a dramatic shift.”

''Nonetheless, it is a significant development, said Inbar, who has monitored the Iranian missile development program for years.''

Who are you?

 

[MarkusS]

All this empty propaganda makes me think we should give Iran the opportunity to show what it really can...such a conflict would be decided within days...

 

[haman10]

Who are you?

A troll in short .

a butthurt to be more specific .