Turkey doesnt rush to produce it at home something like microprocessors, ccd sensor etc. Turkey focused final product design and crucial subsystems.
The point is, those "crucial subsystems" are what you're importing in many cases.
When Turkey introduced SOM at 2011 nearly half of its components were foreign but today only thing is its engine and next year Kale KTJ3200 will be in serial production. Kale and P&W is partner for F35 engine production is in turkey , KTJ 3200 is funded Turkish government and IP rights belong to Turkey, so your wishes are not true, it has zero american contribution, if it is licensed there will be serial production long time ago, development started in 2012.
You're basically proving a point here in that you're assembling some foreign hardware and then acting as if you have the ability to produce its subsystems. It does not matter if you own the IP or not, it does not change the fact it was some foreign designed system with those same foreigners giving you the technology to assemble the products. There are so many examples here, ranging from the German submarines you were assembling, to your role in assembling the F-35 parts.
when you plan to produce a jet engine nobody will sell it is materials,
Yes, and that is why Turkey does not have the ability to produce those materials, instead you have procured the subsystems and putting the final thing together.
Turkey built them in house too.
You're assembling them in house, not building them from scratch. There is a huge difference.
Turkish aviation engine maker is state owned TEI, They have 30,40, 50 , 115 hp gasoline , 155, 170 ,220 hp deisel engine, 38, 90, 300,400 lb turbojet and 1500hp turboshaft engines, all of designed and produced in turkey without foreign contribution. ,
Given the fact you are relying on importing so many parts etc, this notion that you're producing 1500HP turboshaft engine without any outside aid/import is just propaganda.
why dont you look at by yourself? you basically copy european and american engines and proud of it, your cars uses citroen car engine, i can list at least 10 engine manufacturer in turkey.
Forgetting the fact Iran has plenty of indigenously designed engine in many capacity, even if it did "copy" a foreign engine, you still need to have a robust industry to actually produce engines. This is a far cry from the likes of Turkey that directly import the subsystems/assemble and other technologies.
in 2000 first national ballistic missiles fired.
By "national missile" do you mean the Chinese missiles you imported?
First national rocket reached space in 2017 and first space vehicle(technically) made maneuvers at space in 2018.
Turkey has yet to show any space launch capabilities.
Lastly need something about UAVs, we have many kind of them and there is no dependency any part of it.
Most of your UAVs are relying on foreign engines, and yet you say there is "no dependency on any part of it"?
Making a wing shaped UAV doesnt make it stealth
Actually flying wing designs are lower RCS relatively speaking.
, do they have RAM coating and IR management ?
RAM coating, most certainly yes.
no because they are cheap!
Flawed logic. The UAV will follow its function in a cost effective manner, not utilising systems such as RAM could be contrary to its stated function of producing a very low RCS system. Unless you have any direct evidence to suggest otherwise, then refrain from making such statements.
Bayraktar is also very low RCS
No, it is not. It has barely any low RCS design parameters. There only thing low RCS about it is the fact it is a drone, must of which are lower RCS by the virtue of their smaller sizes.
and proved it on panstirs.
Pantsir downed many of your UAVs. The fact that you managed to destroy a few of them suggest a shortcoming in the Pantsir's design and also the importance of layered defence systems. You can take any systems and put it in the open and it will eventually get destroyed. Add that to the shortcomigns of the panstir, then it is not surprise it could be destroyed. Despite the Turkish propaganda, this was obvious to people. more-over, you are still running to purchase Russians air defence systems, that should tell you something.
If you want to see truly impressive use of UAVs, look at the Iranian attack on Saudi oil fields.
making a small uav with jet is only increase its cost per flight our, it is a preference only .
A jet powered, stealthy UCAV is leagues above anything you have produced and compared to propeller driven system, it is of a higher strategic value in a multitude to factors.
and why dont you look at yourself? iranian UAVs doesnt have laser designator(at least i dont see)
You should probably check closer.
and uses ccd seeker with rf link to control small bombs,
Most of these Iranian UAB bombs are "fire and forget", once again, pay closer attention. There are enough thread running on this topic in this forum for you to become adequately informed.
, i can tell many things but it is enough .
Only things you have told so far are attempts to hide the reality of your defence sector and hope (rather naively) that people here could not see through that. Like I have said before, Turkey has made some good progress, but you're nowhere near the level which has been propagandised by some of the Turkish members here. In reality, Turkey is about a decade or two behind the likes of Iran in truly indigenous developments. Not that this is a problem, if Turkey can meet its solution using foreigner imports/reliance, then go ahead, but do not engage in this folly of trying to insinuate you're on Iran's level when it comes to a truly indigenous defence sector. Iran got where it is out of necessity, Turkey has the luxury of importing from the likes of NATO and South Korea etc, Iran does not. so there are different paths the two nations had to take.
i dk why you guys think i’m a troll or some spy
www.state.gov
