What's new

Solution for Indian occupied Kashmir ? Liberation.

@Genghis khan1
Pakistani general during Kargil himself admitted that Pakistan Failed in Kargil:


http://www.dawn.com/news/782010/kargil-adventure-was-four-man-show-general
There are many hearsay stories like that after Musharraf became president and fired some of the people. Most of these people just venting out their frustration but were not involved in Kargil or don't have any know how of operation. Nonetheless there was no either it was 4 or 40 men. Doesn't make slight difference on fact on ground.
 
According to Musharraf, Pakistan can if he play his card right. Which I guess would be launching a blitzkrieg style attack. Taking out major Indian bases and support infrastructure to decapitate Indian defensive capability.There is a reason, Pakistan work extensively on modernizing their missiles than spending money on deep strike fighters.


Do you know why exactly Germany with all it's military superiority failed to occupy and even defeat Russia WWII ??

There are lot many reasons but the most important one is its sheer size. Russia was too big a bite for the Germans to swallow.

Now in our context, yes Pakistan can win few battles and even hurt us maybe badly, but Indian will always win the war, given our size in terms of both Land and Population. So please don't try to play your cards and end up as a "Musharraf :jester:" in the pack. LOL :p:
 
Don't.

Subtlety works only with the seniors. There're about a dozen of them, very mature, very knowledgeable. When they make a point, it is well worth pausing to listen, to reflect, and if necessary - I say this with no shame at all - to recast. The rest are

<wild animals which are believed to be harmful to crops, farm animals, or game, or which carry disease, e.g. rodents.
"killed as ****** or game, the pumas have gone"

  • parasitic worms or insects.
    "his clothes are infested with ******"
  • people perceived as despicable and as causing problems for the rest of society.
    "the ****** who ransacked her house"
    >
like the script kiddies from our side.



DON'T.

JUST CITE THE AMERICANS.

Both Sandy Berger and Bruce Riedel have written about it.

Please. It'll finally get down to pansy exchanges of YouTube videos. Please save us from that unspeakable fate. Please.
Extract you posted is just limited overview of the ending story after Nawaz sharif arrived in washington. Seen it and watched it many times. Some of the assertion are totally wrong (like Nuclear attack) and was bluff played on Nawaz by Clinton. Nonetheless everybody knows Clinton administration (democrats) were and are pro-Indian (lobbying) and stupid Nawaz who expected Republican like behaviour got his dumbass F'ed. Clinton visit for S.Asia, in India for 5 days and in Pakistan for 5 hours should be a sign for Nawaz but he is a corrupt politician afterall. Story is much longer, there are documentary how Sandy Burger pull Clinton out of UN assembly to convey Vajpai urgent message. Desperate calls from Vajpayee to Clinton and treat to open war to cover mounting casualties in Kargil. Back and forth call by Clinton to Nawaz on behalf of Vajpai. One thing is clear even with this extract that, Nawaz decision caused Army to withdraw and Indian Army totally failed.
 
Extract you posted is just limited overview of the ending story after Nawaz sharif arrived in washington. Seen it and watched it many times. Some of the assertion are totally wrong (like Nuclear attack) and was bluff played on Nawaz. Nonetheless everybody knows Clinton administration (democrats) were and are pro-Indian and stupid Nawaz who expected Republican like behaviour got his dumbass F'ed. Clinton visit for S.Asia, in India for 5 days and in Pakistan for 5 hours should be a sign for Nawaz but he is a corrupt politician afterall. Story is much longer, there are documentary how Sandy Burger pull Clinton out of UN assembly to convey Vajpai urgent message. Desperate calls from Vajpayee to Clinton and treat to open war to cover mounting casualties in Kargil. Back and forth call by Clinton to Nawaz on behalf of Vajpai. One thing is clear even with this extract that, Nawaz decision caused Army to withdraw and Indian Army totally failed.

Then print it.

Put your money where your mouth is.
 
The only solution now left is with good politics not with war anymore. Pakistan should evolve this issue in UN on international level as much as they can. and should provide solid evidences of all the brutality and human rights violations India is doing in Kashmir. we must seek the solution on international level now and make our voice higher on this issue and we should bring china inside and ask him to support us on this issue on higher level.
Won't work. Pakistan tried it for 50 years. Best bet is to improve economy and military and threat of war. UN only work when a nation is strong or war is imminent.

Then print it.

Put your money where your mouth is.
Multiple documentaries narrating the events. Ain't got time to search it for you during mid night. You can search yale link about about googling the whole story of events. But Indian claim that super duper operation VIjay got them their were proven wrong by your own link.

If you ever had a small bit of logic or at-least capable of thinking you won't be saying this. :(

From the beginning of Kargil war your army and government denied to acknowledged the fact that it were your regulars and therefore couldn't support them with PAF or heavy artillery. On the contrary, India had used it's heavy Bofors gun, IAF, and other heavy equipment's against the well dug in enemies, and you seriously think that your men had an upper hand with no heavy military hardware/support and just because they were on a higher altitude ??? Then you should be living in some dream world. LOL

FYI, we never flew to Washington, it was your PM who went there to save his ... you know what ?? :p:
Moreover when you know that you were highly outnumbered, what prompted Pakistan army to "Operation Chengiz Khan," ?? It was a war officially started by Pakistan not India. Actually we were ready and you invited us to walk in. LOL :p:
No shit sherlock. Pakistan denied, that why support was very limited. It was a limited operation. Only Paramilitary was involved and some regular support. Tactically it was a superb operation that will be studied by military all over the world. Bofors, IAF all failed. How and why, I bet every academy will have a chapter on this for their officer.

Do you know why exactly Germany with all it's military superiority failed to occupy and even defeat Russia WWII ??

There are lot many reasons but the most important one is its sheer size. Russia was too big a bite for the Germans to swallow.

Now in our context, yes Pakistan can win few battles and even hurt us maybe badly, but Indian will always win the war, given our size in terms of both Land and Population. So please don't try to play your cards and end up as a "Musharraf :jester:" in the pack. LOL :p:
Forget how 22,000 gora came and enslaved millions of Indians. Size only help if you are Alpha nation willing to fight.
 
they were civilians, its stupidity to count them in armed personnals,, when pak army was butchering bangalis, even then bangalis were more in number than army, but thet got killed, because they were civilians . . .this outnumbering theory is a fabricated lie...
and civil war u say! it was a pogrom, an ethnic cleansing of bengalis . . . until India intervened because of 100 of millions of bengalis migrations and strain on indian economy

And.I asked Sandy Berger... he knows nothing :lol: . . in his biography, clinton has written that it was sharif that begged for clemency and mercy . . . which was granted by Magnanimous Indians @Genghis khan1
 
Won't work. Pakistan tried it for 50 years. Best bet is to improve economy and military and threat of war. UN only work when a nation is strong or war is imminent.


Multiple documentaries narrating the events. Ain't got time to search it for you during mid night. You can search yale link about about googling the whole story of events. But Indian claim that super duper operation VIjay got them their were proven wrong by your own link.


No shit sherlock. Pakistan denied, that why support was very limited. It was a limited operation. Only Paramilitary was involved and some regular support. Tactically it was a superb operation that will be studied by military all over the world. Bofors, IAF all failed. How and why, I bet every academy will have a chapter on this for their officer.


Forget how 22,000 gora came and enslaved millions of Indians. Size only help if you are Alpha nation willing to fight
.

By documentaries, you probably mean fanboy compositions released on YouTube.

In short, nothing.

Just another 420 caught in his bluffing.
 
"As the Indian counter-attacks picked up momentum, Pakistani prime minister Nawaz Sharif flew to meet US President Bill Clinton on 4 July to obtain support from the United States. Clinton rebuked Sharif, however, and asked him to use his contacts to rein in the militants and withdraw Pakistani soldiers from Indian territory. Clinton would later reveal in his autobiography that "Sharif's moves were perplexing" since the Indian Prime Minister had travelled to Lahore to promote bilateral talks aimed at resolving the Kashmir problem and "by crossing the Line of Control, Pakistan had wrecked the [bilateral] talks".[92] On the other hand, he applauded Indian restraint for not crossing the LoC and escalating the conflict into an all-out war.[93]".
from book "My life - random house" bill clinton 2004 .. .. page 865
 
@Joe Shearer Start 16:20. I know he is one of India's favorite journalist. According to him, he also exchanged note from someone who was in with US national security advisor.

 
pakistan is getting desperate :lol:
they've failed with talks, with fake dossiers, with war. Perhaps its time to move on?
 
@Joe Shearer Start 16:20. I know he is one of India's favorite journalist. According to him, he also exchanged note from someone who was in with US national security advisor.


You are using THIS as evidence? I thought as much.

You and your Pakistani TV interviews. There's that other moron who keeps repeating a ridiculous figure, and when challenged with the correct figures, always whines saying that General Musharraf said so in a television interview!

Try the next street.
 
By documentaries, you probably mean fanboy compositions released on YouTube.

In short, nothing.

Just another 420 caught in his bluffing.
So what did you proved so far. Nothing. Your half fast link doesn't prove anything. Other than that Indeed Pakistan withdrew under US pressure.

You are using THIS as evidence? I thought as much.

You and your Pakistani TV interviews. There's that other moron who keeps repeating a ridiculous figure, and when challenged with the correct figures, always whines saying that General Musharraf said so in a television interview!

Try the next street.
How about listening to it before talking. Indians love posting his link. How about listen to him when he claim he got his source directly from someone in the room.
 
So what did you proved so far. Nothing. Your half fast link doesn't prove anything. Other than that Indeed Pakistan withdrew under US pressure.

Don't waste our time please. Now you've shown where you get your information and facts from, you will be treated accordingly. My maid servant is probably better qualified to discuss these topics. She watches more TV. :D
 
I guess you don't know what blitzkrieg is. There won't be any Indian response. The main idea is to strike it hard the first time, capture as much land possible and offset your enemy. Enemy will have no other choice other than defending whatever left of it. Same Idea worked in 2002 standoff. As per wikileaks cables, if 2002 Indo-Pak war had started, Indian would be at several disadvantage. It took India whole month to mobilize its forces while Pakistan did it in days.

"Enemy" has a choice - it just needs to open the flood gates, nature will take care of the rest
 
Back
Top Bottom