DoubleYouSee
FULL MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/Lieutenant.jpg)
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2012
- Messages
- 577
- Reaction score
- 0
Exactly you said what i think........and wish you a good marriage..........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
im speaking about all base soldiers r in base so it became damege they say no missile heat l asad they have no pass to come to iraq so deportedWell in a manner he is right that's called injury not damage .
@PeeD
BREAKING (unconfirmed): Iran's Channel 4 state TV just said that Iran is working on 2 new SLVs: "Sarir" SLV with a uniform 2.4 metre (!) diameter. "Soroush" SLV with 4 metre (!) diameter, for sending satellites into GEO. It also mentioned that the Safir SLV would be retired.
![]()
If you mean Qhaem SLV then its changed name to Sourosh SLV but if you mean Qhoghnoos SLV in Farsi thats just another name for Simorgh so they are the same only Qhaem changed name to Sourosh and the new one named Sarrir that is like 2 Simorgh attached on top of each other in the deimater os 2.4 Meter.Considering that Safir was a weak SLV (basically a converted sounding rocket) and Simorgh was still way too weak as well. Both SLVs were unreliable based on success rate. Also one was based on 2007 technology another 2010.
So for Iran to spend 10 years building two new SLVs and they still aren’t ready? I would expect at least Sarir to be ready by now.
Disappointing progress thus far in the space program given Iran’s advanced knowledge in missile industry.
Also what happened to Qalnoos (spelling?) which was supposed to be the next SLV in line? Was it scrapped or another name change?
@PeeD @Messerschmitt
Would it be logical to assume Iran also has airburst warheads that can be fitted on to existing Fateh missiles?
Seems like a no-brainer but I wanted to get your guy's thoughts on it.
Pro-Kremlin Southfront's take (analysis) on the Iranian Ain al-Asad missile attack: https://southfront.org/analysis-of-the-iranian-missile-strikes-on-ayn-al-asad-airbase/
without reading it I say its filled with nonsense just by hearing the name of the source of it.Very good analysis:
It also talks about those two run-way hits, that are clear capability display of the IRGC-ASF to the USAF:
High terminal velocity impacting Qiam-2 hitting the runway: I expect that the kinetic power and the intense shock wave create cracks and deformations in the runways that need time intensive repair work.
If that's the case, the message was: Look, our inexpensive Qiams will render all your air operations 500-800km from Irans borders inoperable. This is the range at which U.S tactical airpower can effectively fight with needed sortie rate.
Decrease sortie rate of U.S airpower and you directly decrease their warfighting capability. Decrease warfighting capability and your other missile assets can be spend without concerns of being destroyed, especially less survivable, time intensive and legacy ones.
Then read it. It is very factual without any bios.without reading it I say its filled with nonsense just by hearing the name of the source of it.