Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

[DoubleYouSee]

Exactly you said what i think........and wish you a good marriage..........

 

[skyshadow]

 

[Ich]

And a lot more you can find here

https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/dod_strategic_spectrum_plan_nov2007.pdf

 

[ashool]

Well in a manner he is right that's called injury not damage .

im speaking about all base soldiers r in base so it became damege they say no missile heat l asad they have no pass to come to iraq so deported

 

[skyshadow]

@PeeD


BREAKING (unconfirmed): Iran's Channel 4 state TV just said that Iran is working on 2 new SLVs: "Sarir" SLV with a uniform 2.4 metre (!) diameter. "Soroush" SLV with 4 metre (!) diameter, for sending satellites into GEO. It also mentioned that the Safir SLV would be retired.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1221841338880139264

 

[TheImmortal]

@PeeD


BREAKING (unconfirmed): Iran's Channel 4 state TV just said that Iran is working on 2 new SLVs: "Sarir" SLV with a uniform 2.4 metre (!) diameter. "Soroush" SLV with 4 metre (!) diameter, for sending satellites into GEO. It also mentioned that the Safir SLV would be retired.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1221841338880139264

Considering that Safir was a weak SLV (basically a converted sounding rocket) and Simorgh was still way too weak as well. Both SLVs were unreliable based on success rate. Also one was based on 2007 technology another 2010.

So for Iran to spend 10 years building two new SLVs and they still aren’t ready? I would expect at least Sarir to be ready by now.

Disappointing progress thus far in the space program given Iran’s advanced knowledge in missile industry.

Also what happened to Qalnoos (spelling?) which was supposed to be the next SLV in line? Was it scrapped or another name change?

 

[skyshadow]

Considering that Safir was a weak SLV (basically a converted sounding rocket) and Simorgh was still way too weak as well. Both SLVs were unreliable based on success rate. Also one was based on 2007 technology another 2010.

So for Iran to spend 10 years building two new SLVs and they still aren’t ready? I would expect at least Sarir to be ready by now.

Disappointing progress thus far in the space program given Iran’s advanced knowledge in missile industry.

Also what happened to Qalnoos (spelling?) which was supposed to be the next SLV in line? Was it scrapped or another name change?

If you mean Qhaem SLV then its changed name to Sourosh SLV but if you mean Qhoghnoos SLV in Farsi thats just another name for Simorgh so they are the same only Qhaem changed name to Sourosh and the new one named Sarrir that is like 2 Simorgh attached on top of each other in the deimater os 2.4 Meter.

Agreed they were very weak Iran was moving very slow i will say for JCPOA but now that they are saying new SLV names then maybe they are moving on from JCPOA we have to see when they will give an other launch time for now in 14 days we will have at least one launch or two as they are two sats that are ready and waiting launch.

 

[VEVAK]

@PeeD @Messerschmitt

Would it be logical to assume Iran also has airburst warheads that can be fitted on to existing Fateh missiles?

Seems like a no-brainer but I wanted to get your guy's thoughts on it.

Iran mainly wanted to prove the accuracy of it's missiles so the Americans don't miscalculate based on the delusional thinking of some in this US administration....

 

[TheImmortal]

Iran mainly wanted to prove the accuracy of it's missiles so the Americans don't miscalculate based on the delusional thinking of some in this US administration....

Nobody in Pentagon wants war with Iran and Trump doesn’t want war with Iran. He wanted the PR of killing a “bad guy” that’s it.

US killed Iran’s most important general plus a Brigadier General along with 3 other high ranking Quds operatives AND attempted an assassination of Quds force general of Yemen operations the same night. All it got in return was some concussed soldiers and a damaged Iraqi base.

That is a no brainer exchange in favor of the US in the short term. Long term we shall see if Iraqis can kick the US out.

But let’s not move the goal posts and say that Iran prevented war. US pulled a card from the Zionist deck which means they took a high ranking Iranian official off the battlefield with little price to pay.

Don’t forget the Israel assassination of Quds force General Allahdadi along with high ranking Quds force and Hezbollah operatives near Israeli border. Iran ended up doing nothing. HZ ended up killing a few border patrol soldiers.

Pentagon won’t want war with Iran till it’s sufficiently weakened and de-fanged. That’s how US operates it waits till the target is weakened before coming in and acting like they did anything (see Iraq, Libya, Syria).

 

[Messerschmitt]

Pro-Kremlin Southfront's take (analysis) on the Iranian Ain al-Asad missile attack: https://southfront.org/analysis-of-the-iranian-missile-strikes-on-ayn-al-asad-airbase/

 

[PeeD]

Pro-Kremlin Southfront's take (analysis) on the Iranian Ain al-Asad missile attack: https://southfront.org/analysis-of-the-iranian-missile-strikes-on-ayn-al-asad-airbase/

Very good analysis:

It also talks about those two run-way hits, that are clear capability display of the IRGC-ASF to the USAF:

High terminal velocity impacting Qiam-2 hitting the runway: I expect that the kinetic power and the intense shock wave create cracks and deformations in the runways that need time intensive repair work.

If that's the case, the message was: Look, our inexpensive Qiams will render all your air operations 500-800km from Irans borders inoperable. This is the range at which U.S tactical airpower can effectively fight with needed sortie rate.
Decrease sortie rate of U.S airpower and you directly decrease their warfighting capability. Decrease warfighting capability and your other missile assets can be spend without concerns of being destroyed, especially less survivable, time intensive and legacy ones.

 

[GWXP]

This precision is a game changer.

In Israel 6 power plants with 26 production units supply 51% of electricity.
5 desalination plants supply 50% of drinking water. Same situation with electricity management and gas distribution.

200 precise hits at Israels strategic infrastructure will leave Israel without electricity, gas, water, gasoline thus devastating Israeli economy.

With this precision Iran can target hardened shelters for Israeli fighters at Israeli airbases.
400 precise hits at hardened shelters will destroy Israeli air force.

So Iran needs 600 precise hits to destroy Israeli economy and air force.

Fateh-313 is a wonderful missile....Iran can attack Israeli targets with this missile from Northern Iraq.

What Iran now needs is quantity quantity quantity

Deployment of hundreds of Fateh-313 missiles in Syria, Lebanon and Northern Iraq will allow to achieve strategic balance with Israel and even first strike capability.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Very good analysis:

It also talks about those two run-way hits, that are clear capability display of the IRGC-ASF to the USAF:

High terminal velocity impacting Qiam-2 hitting the runway: I expect that the kinetic power and the intense shock wave create cracks and deformations in the runways that need time intensive repair work.

If that's the case, the message was: Look, our inexpensive Qiams will render all your air operations 500-800km from Irans borders inoperable. This is the range at which U.S tactical airpower can effectively fight with needed sortie rate.
Decrease sortie rate of U.S airpower and you directly decrease their warfighting capability. Decrease warfighting capability and your other missile assets can be spend without concerns of being destroyed, especially less survivable, time intensive and legacy ones.

without reading it I say its filled with nonsense just by hearing the name of the source of it.

 

[yavar]

U.S Pentagon now says 50 troops suffered brain injuries in Iran IRGC ballistic missile strike in Iraq
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/pen...ers-suffered-brain-injuries/story?id=68598126

 

[Arminkh]

without reading it I say its filled with nonsense just by hearing the name of the source of it.

Then read it. It is very factual without any bios.