Why the hatred for India is so sublime than vice versa...are Pakistanis more civilized

[N.Siddiqui]

Which scientists say that Pakistanis and indians are not racially different

Get over with it...seems as though out of 9,857 posts you have....about 9,850 posts were about racial superiority of Pakistanis, how Pakistanis are different racially from Indians...so on and so forth.

What is the point of all these posts...the moment you think you are superior to others you cease to be one...Islam and other religions forbids thinking high of himself/herself, no racial discrimination, superiority complexes are allowed in Islam and in fact they are cited as 'Takabbur' only fit for the creator God...human beings cannot say big things about oneself and full with racial superiority complexes...we are mortals, now present, gone tomorrow beneath tons of Mitti...

 

[Cuirassier]

Wannabe Yeniceri folks here

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

the credentials of journalists like Almeida and Sethi and the logic they give.

Najam Sethi is a long time PMLN supporter/member - he was appointed to the PCB by Nawaz Sharif because of his PMLN loyalties.

Cyril Almeida was never an official member of the PMLN, but if you read his tweets, his political leanings and bias are pretty obvious.

Neither of them qualify as objective and unbiased commentators.

 

[Pakistani Fighter]

Najam Sethi is a long time PMLN supporter/member - he was appointed to the PCB by Nawaz Sharif because of his PMLN loyalties.

Cyril Almeida was never an official member of the PMLN, but if you read his tweets, his political leanings and bias are pretty obvious.

Neither of them qualify as objective and unbiased commentators.

Same is the case with Sabir Shakir, Siddique Jan, Andleeb Abbas etc

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Same is the case with Sabir Shakir, Siddique Jan, Andleeb Abbas etc

Weren't Najam Sethi and Hussain Haqqani (there were one or two more individuals in this 'gang' that I can't remember) friends and 'comrades in arms' who fought in Balochistan against the State or something in their youth?

I might be getting the names mixed up.

 

[Pakistani Fighter]

Weren't Najam Sethi and Hussain Haqqani (there were one or two more individuals in this 'gang' that I can't remember) friends and 'comrades in arms' who fought in Balochistan against the State or something in their youth?

I might be getting the names mixed up.

I have no idea about it. I was talking about political biasness

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

I have no idea about it. I was talking about political biasness

Nevermind, it was Najam Sethi and Ahmed Rashid (the author of the book 'Taliban').

 

[Suriya]

Yes, Pakistanis, generally speaking, are far more civilised and far less bigoted than their Indian neighbours.

The ideology of Hindutva that defines contemporary India is essentially exclusivist and parochial, based entirely on deep hatred towards those (people as well as religions) deemed foreigners; Inferiority complex stemming from thousand years of slavery in their own lands.

To put it in one sentence to understand Hindu generosity and promotion of harmony and co-existence by the Hindus, you will have to take seven births.

It's the Hindu India gave refugee people of all religion and give then freedom to practice their religion.

1. You know the first mosque was built in India before they built one in Pakistan. It was built in Kerala in 630 AD and it still survives. FYI, Kerala was never ruled by Muslims .

2. The oldest Church in India is in Kerala was was built in 52 AD. It survives today. FYI, Kerala was never ruled by Christians.

3. When Paris or Zoroastrians came to India 1200 yrs ago , they first came to coast of Gujarat , the king Hindu. They asked a place for their Fire temple where there would non-Parsis within 50kM radius. The Hindu king agreed. You wont a parsi saying who was persecuted in India because his religion.

4. If you ask the Jews, he will Hindu India was the only place where Jews were persecuted.

5. Hindu majority India is the only where several different religions with so many coexists peacefully.
India got partitioned on the basis of muslim and non-muslim, still Hindus allowed Muslims live in India and didn't drive away muslims from India like non-Muslims driven away from Pakistan.

5. After Partition, India could easily have been a Hindu state like Pakistan become an Islamic republic but no, India gave import to secular laws and constitutions. At the same time, let Muslims enjoy sharia based civil laws. Contrast with Pakistan, non-Muslim marriages get dissolved by default if one of the spouses coverts to Islam or married Hindu woman marries a Muslim man.


@AgNoStiC MuSliM A simple test would suffice, if you ask any random non-musiim or non-hindu which country he would rather live ? India or Pakistan ?

 

[padamchen]

To put it in one sentence to understand Hindu generosity and promotion harmony and co-existence by the Hindus, you will have to take seven birth.

It's the Hindu India gave refugee people of all religion and give then freedom to practice their religion.

1. You know the first mosque was built in India before they built one in Pakistan. It was built in Kerala in 630 AD and it still survives. FYI, Kerala was never ruled by Muslims .

2. The oldest Church in India is in Kerala was was built in 52 AD. It survives today. FYI, Kerala was never ruled by Christians.

3. When Paris or Zoroastrians came to India 1200 yrs ago , they first came to coast of Gujarat , the king Hindu. They asked a place for their Fire temple where there would non-Parsis within 50kM radius. The Hindu king agreed. You wont a parsi saying who was persecuted in India because his religion.

4. If you ask the Jews, he will Hindu India was the only place where Jews were persecuted.

5. Hindu majority India is the only where several different religions with so many coexists peacefully.
India got partitioned on the basis of muslim and non-muslim, still Hindus allowed Muslims live in India and didn't drive away muslims from India like non-Muslims driven away from Pakistan.

5. After Partition, India could easily have been a Hindu state like Pakistan become an Islamic republic but no, India gave import to secular laws and constitutions. At the same time, let Muslims enjoy sharia based civil laws. Contrast with Pakistan, non-Muslim marriages get dissolved by default if one of the spouses coverts to Islam or married Hindu woman marries a Muslim man.


@AgNoStiC MuSliM A simple test would suffice, if you ask any random non-musiim or non-hindu which country he would rather live ? India or Pakistan ?

Well said.

They don't need 7 births.

They are Hindu by blood.

 

[M. Sarmad]

To put it in one sentence to understand Hindu generosity and promotion of harmony and co-existence by the Hindus, you will have to take seven births.

You do not need seven births, you just need to have a little common sense to understand that Hindu slavery was not due to their generosity or a desire to promote interfaith harmony but due to the relative weakness and inferiority of the Indian Hindus viz a viz superior invading races. They didn't choose to be slaves, they were forced into slavery.

And Hindus carried out Buddhist genocide in the past, today they are carrying out Muslim genocide... They aren't peaceful people as you are falsely trying to claim here.

They are Hindu by blood.

And what exactly is Hindu by blood?

 

[padamchen]

You do not need seven births, you just need to have a little common sense to understand that Hindu slavery was not due to their generosity or a desire to promote interfaith harmony but due to the relative weakness and inferiority of the Indian Hindus viz a viz superior invading races. They didn't choose to be slaves, they were forced into slavery.

And Hindus carried Buddhist genocide in the past, today they are carrying out Muslim genocide... They aren't peaceful people as you are falsely trying to claim here.



And what exactly is Hindu by blood?

Agree.

But he was talking about the last 400 years when they'd broken your back.

And still allow you to live with them in peace.

We wouldn't. It's a racial difference.

Which is what I meant by blood.

Your fights reflect that blood on blood inability to go for the neck.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Well said.

They don't need 7 births.

They are Hindu by blood.

Parsis are hindu by blood?

 

[M. Sarmad]

Agree.

But he was talking about the last 400 years when they'd broken your back.

And still allow you to live with them in peace.

No Hindu had dominated our lands in the last 400 years. They never were in a position to 'allow/disallow' us anything.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

@AgNoStiC MuSliM A simple test would suffice, if you ask any random non-musiim or non-hindu which country he would rather live ? India or Pakistan ?

Such a choice would be based primarily on perceptions about living standards, development levels, employment opportunities etc.

It's a pointless test.

 

[padamchen]

Parsis are hindu by blood?

Stupid questions will henceforth not be responded to.

Nor infantile men with internet

No Hindu had dominated our lands in the last 400 years. They never were in a position to 'allow/disallow' us anything.

We Marathas disagree.

So do the Sikhs.

Hindus are to blame for the British.

Hindus are to blame for Pakistan.