What's new

JF-17 Thunder - Information Pool

There were 2 options for IFR

1. Chinese which I think is basically copy of Israeli and perhaps NATO std.
2. PAC and South African adoption of Mirage upgrade for JF-17 , probe is NATO std.

Not sure which option was exercised.

The valves in the probe and drogue that are most commonly used are to a NATO standard and were originally developed by the company Flight Refuelling Limited in the UK and deployed in the late 1940s and 1950s. This standardization allows drogue-equipped tanker aircraft from many nations the ability to refuel probe-equipped aircraft from other nations. The NATO standard probe system incorporates shear rivets that attach the refueling valve to the end of the probe. This is so that if a large side or vertical load develops while in contact with the drogue, the rivets shear and the fuel valve breaks off, rather than the probe or receiver aircraft suffering structural damage. A so-called "broken probe" (actually a broken fuel valve, as described above) may happen if poor flying technique is used by the receiver pilot, or in turbulence. Sometimes the valve is retained in the tanker drogue and prevents further refueling from that drogue until removed during ground maintenance.

Cobham plc :: Mission Systems, Mission Equipment, Autonomous Air-to-Air Refuelling
 
Last edited:
F6VzBYY.jpg


any info regarding this ''fuse''?
not a well known site as its in spanish -- ive told them of jft info pool thread on def.pk -- you know i cant stop publicizing my info pool / def.pk and jft :devil:
El JF-17 cayó en el olvido... ?? - Página 4


Its the RF proximity fuse.

Below you will find two pictures where in the first production batch the 4 fuse sensors are covered in red, while in another picture the Pt-06 is carrying a live round showing in golden color the RF proximity sensors.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_En-sxfOkXP8/TPew24FgCCI/AAAAAAAAHjE/irH1os9Xn9Y/s1600/sd-10.bmp

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-1l2FmN7BEFM/UBChIzRbhmI/AAAAAAAAAUA/n2jL57KRYWU/s1600/FC-1_SD-10A1.jpg
via taimi
 
There were 2 options for IFR

1. Chinese which I think is basically copy of Israeli and perhaps NATO std.
2. PAC and South African adoption of Mirage upgrade for JF-17 , probe is NATO std.

Not sure which option was exercised.

The valves in the probe and drogue that are most commonly used are to a NATO standard and were originally developed by the company Flight Refuelling Limited in the UK and deployed in the late 1940s and 1950s. This standardization allows drogue-equipped tanker aircraft from many nations the ability to refuel probe-equipped aircraft from other nations. The NATO standard probe system incorporates shear rivets that attach the refueling valve to the end of the probe. This is so that if a large side or vertical load develops while in contact with the drogue, the rivets shear and the fuel valve breaks off, rather than the probe or receiver aircraft suffering structural damage. A so-called "broken probe" (actually a broken fuel valve, as described above) may happen if poor flying technique is used by the receiver pilot, or in turbulence. Sometimes the valve is retained in the tanker drogue and prevents further refueling from that drogue until removed during ground maintenance.

Cobham plc :: Mission Systems, Mission Equipment, Autonomous Air-to-Air Refuelling
paf is using south-african IFR probe
1530518_331861196957023_369998204_n.jpg
JF-17+Thunder+Fighter+Jets+Fitted+with+Fixed+In-Flight+Refuelling+%28IFR%29+Probe+pakistan+air+force+paf+il-78+tanker+blcok+I+II+III+IV%281%29.jpg
 
bH1UQ3v.jpg
YSsrKW1.jpg
Wa6cCWB.jpg
rqcFiNW.png
2rYQj.jpg
FaAhe.jpg


Please forgive me, I've started to watermark my posters now --- the jf-17 vs gripen poster has been circulated in russian,serbian,indian,pakistani,british,american,chinese,indonasian and spanish fora till now :smart:

X0FWFIO.jpg


XouPYXU.jpg


dqzzzBN.jpg


GEPGrA1.jpg
 
Drop tanks on JF-17 carry 1100 liters of fuel. The recent article listed them as 1000 liter which is wrong or they just wanted to round.

1100 liter / US Gal 3.7 = 297 or ~ 300 US Gallons. Under belly is 800 liter so 800/ 3.7 ~ 216 Gallons.

JP5 weight ~ 6.6 lbs per US Gallon so 300X6.6 = 1980 lbs of Gas plus drop tank and pylon weight is the max load of pylons, am I correct?

Under belly already cleared for 2000 lbs MK84 which other then F16 no other a/c of the PAF can carry or are not usually carried.

Wing tip is cleared for ~120 KG i.e. max weight of PL-9 (assumed) and PL5EII and A-dater type ~90kg plus launcher wt. not sure about other stations but 2 X MK82 LGB ~ or 250KG X2 = 500kg plus pylon may be the max.

I hope they add under intake pylon for LDP but Chinese pod is heavy compared to say LM F16 pod (Sniper is ~200KG) vs WMD-7 ~280 KG, french and Israeli pods wt. ranges ~230-250kg

JF-17 total internal / external fuel capacity is 6000 liters. 3000 liters internal + 3000 (1100+1100+800) external. Mirage 5 internal is more 2700/2800 kg vs JF17 2300 KG + (2330KG exact) but its a little bigger, F7 is ~1900/2000 KG internal but its engine fuel consumption sucks compared to RD-93
 
Ministry of Defence Production-Year Book 2012-13 (online published date 26-03-2014)
Page 49
On-going Specialist Projects
  • Development of Universal Pylon for JF-17 aircraft
Page 50
  • JF-17 Airframe Co-Production Project: Activities related to JF-17 airframe co-production project continued at a consistent pace during FY 2012-13. TOT work for various co-production activities commenced during the year, while milestones of capability achievement for various activities were achieved. A wide range of surface treatment processes, heat treatment facilities, and auxiliary equipment have been commissioned and qualified for JF-17 production.
Page 51

  • Avionics Production Factory (APF):It also produces Radar Warning Receivers and Identification of Friend and Foe system through a joint venture with M/s CEIEC of China (not sure it is specifically related with JF-17 or not)

Page 52
  • Serial production of Audio Control Box (ACB) for Block II

  • Indigenous tester for Light Warning System (LWS) has been developed for JF-17 aircraft

  • APF acquired capability in deployment of different testers for JF-17 avionics i.e Avionics Integrated Maintenance Station (AIMS), Integrated Survivalable Recordable (ISR), Weapon Mission Management Computer (WMMC) and Electro Mechanical Management Computer (EMMC).

  • Smart Weapons Avionics Integration capability acquired through standard II transfer of Technology (ToT) contract. (not sure it is specifically related with JF-17 or not)
Page 59

View attachment 24563
Page 69

Following projects completed successfully in 2012-13 by Dte MP (Air):-
  • Audio Control Box for JF-17 A/C (Qty-6)
Ministry of Defence Production-Year Book 2012-13
 
Good to know that a second anti-radiation missile is available with JF-17.
 
jJuqp1j.jpg


news-ghq-visit-pac.jpg

A Team of 5 Members of GHQ Visits PAC Kamra

08 May, 2014 - A team of 05 members of GHQ visited PAC Kamra on 08 May, 2014. The team was headed by Vice Chief of General Staff Major General Ghayur Mahmood. The team was welcomed at PAC Kamra. A briefing was given to the visiting team, presenting the products and capabilities of PAC Kamra. Detailed question-answer session was carried out during the briefing, which showed keen interest of the participants. The briefing was followed by a visit to the factories. The visiting team of GHQ highly appreciated the established facilities. The head of team acknowledged that Pakistan Aeronautical Complex Kamra plays a vital role in the Aerial Defence of Pakistan.

5wZQuZX.jpg
ClB7Yeo.jpg
ddh3Cuj.jpg
 
first to confirm the existing FC1 most authoritative data (from YANG video, 2011 data):
High machine: 4.6M
Wingspan: 9.5M
captain : 14.3M Empty weight: 6400 KG normal takeoff weight: 9100 Yau: 2300KG overload: more than 8G climb rate: 249M / s (at sea level, Mach 0.85) Basic range: 1,800 km Maximum range: 3,000 km (linked to three external fuel tanks) Life time: 3.5 hours to carry 4 * 250kg + two + three short high-level tank combat radius of 1,000 kilometers mode. Pets 2 +2 + short + three tank tall high mode, the battle radius of 1400 km. Takeoff distance: 450M landing distance: 750M are watching a video link:总设计师用英语讲解枭龙战机性能|2011年迪拜国际航空展|迪拜航展|枭龙_新浪视频 Below yes right right dress RD93mA FC1 is looking after the engine has been initially though WS13 stereotypes, but from mature early, 9500 or 9800 is no shadow of things the most likely renewal or modification of this thrust RD93MA 93 increased from the original 8300KG 9300KG. Do not underestimate this increase 1000kg thrust, it will let FC1 to bid farewell: the era of poor and weak thrust takeoff weight of 9100kg from FC1 can be seen taking off and 9300KG finally pushed ratio is greater than one of the FC1. In contrast to normal F-10 takeoff weight of 12400KG, engine thrust 12500kg This can be seen FC1 (93MA) push weaker than the F-10 has no meaning on the FC1 climb and acceleration are no longer behind the F-10 and F16, as for the original level of mobility is FC1 strengths. Takeoff distance will be shortened to about 380 meters, payload of five tons or more (major changes in the structure of the results of 2012, it is estimated also to meet 93MA equipment), is estimated to climb to 280 m / S ((sea level, Mach 0.85, shot in the dark)casually mention next, FC1, and the gap between the F-10 avionics, avionics FC1 overall architecture is more advanced than the F-10 rather than backward, and this is the advantage FC1, such as electronic jamming system is the most advanced FC1 advanced than the F-10 cockpit design is FC1 are significantly stronger than the F-10, but in a somewhat less FC1 subsystem such as radar air search radar FC1 is 130 kilometers (three square meters target), the F-10 air search radar 145 kilometers (three square meters target) in 2016, FC1-BLOCK2, will install the new FC1 whole operating system to more than four degrees, air refueling equipment, high-speed data link (data link is now much stronger than the FC1) etc. Finally, under a lot of people would like to think that the Air Force is FC1 performance was not bad but my analysis, it is precisely the opposite. Firstly, FC1 performance is good, but also caused the price is too expensive FC1 from Air Force Cheng Fei and could not agree on the price of FC1 can be seen under the Air Force wanted to let FC1 replace the J-7 and q5 then the price will not be too expensive to FC1's J-7 and q5 also stand-alone $ 500 to 800 million and to FC1 Direct prices soared to 1500 to $ 25 million, have more than doubled the price is followed by the customary question, is FC1 is designed according to the American standard, it is also Pakistan's operational thinking (from the U.S.), it plainly is having FC1 Strong ground-to-sea combat fighter force as decades in the Air Force when the anti-Chinese Air Force, not used to such a fighter, so there is more accustomed to the F-10 has a strong ability to multi-purpose interceptor fighter abilities final , FC1 Although 2003 began test but until recently considered to achieve full status, the Air Force has four years of their study may also like, like, like the year such as JH-7. FC1, but no matter which equipment is not equipped with the Chinese Air Force is an excellent lightweight fighter ordering Pakistan 150 plus 100 250 of the amount of intent from a few years is the absolute main FC1 Pakistan, after all, not a few F16 aircraft , please do not say it is Pakistan's ability to nurture its own production was This means there may be equipped with FC1, but if FC1 poor equipment I believe that Pakistan would not always the brink of war in Pakistan, more than you know the demand for aircraft performance.

对换装RD93mA发动机后的FC1 期待-空军版-超级大本营军事论坛-最具影响力军事论坛 -

First to confirm the existing FC1 most authoritative data (from YANG video, 2011 data):
Height: 4.6M
Wingspan: 9.5M
Captain: 14.3M

Empty weight: 6400 KG
Normal takeoff weight: 9100
Yau: 2300KG

Overload: more than 8G
Climb rate: 249M / s (at sea level, Mach 0.85)

The basic range: 1,800 km Maximum range: 3,000 km (hanging three drop tanks)
Life time: 3.5 hours to carry 4 * 250kg + two + three short high-level tank combat radius of 1,000 kilometers mode.
Pets 2 +2 + short + three tank tall high mode, the battle radius of 1400 km.

Takeoff distance: 450M
Landing distance: 750M

141552905.jpg


Are watching a video link: 总设计师用英语讲解枭龙战机性能|2011年迪拜国际航空展|迪拜航展|枭龙_新浪视频

Below yes right right after facelift RD93mA engine FC1 expectations although WS13 has begun stereotypes, but from mature early, 9500 or 9800 is no shadow of things the most likely renewal or RD93MA these 93 improved thrust from the original 8300KG to 9300KG.

Do not underestimate this increase 1000kg thrust, it will let FC1 to bid farewell: the era of poor and weak thrust takeoff weight of 9100kg from FC1 can be seen taking off and 9300KG finally pushed ratio is greater than one of the FC1.
Normal takeoff weight compared to the F-10 is 12400KG, engine thrust 12500kg
This can be seen FC1 (93MA) push weaker than the F-10 has no meaning on the FC1 climb and acceleration are no longer behind the F-10 and F16, as for the original level of mobility is FC1 strengths.

Takeoff distance will be shortened to about 380 meters, payload of five tons or more (major changes in the structure of the results of 2012, it is estimated also to meet 93MA equipment), is estimated to climb to 280 m / S ((sea level, Mach 0.85, shot in the dark)

Just mention the next, FC1 and F-10 avionics gap, the overall architecture avionics FC1 is more advanced than the F-10 instead of backward, and this is the advantage of FC1, such as electronic jamming systems FC1 is the most advanced than the F-10 are FC1 advanced cockpit design is significantly stronger than the F-10, but in a somewhat less subsystem FC1.Such as radar air search radar FC1 is 130 kilometers (three square meters target), the F-10 air search radar was 145 km (3 m2 target).In 2016, FC1-BLOCK2, new FC1 will install the whole operating system to more than four degrees, aerial refueling equipment, high-speed data link (data link FC1 than it is now much better), and so on


141552944.jpg

141552989.jpg


Finally, say many people thought it was a bad performance FC1 Air Force was not my analysis, but it is precisely the opposite.
First, FC1 performance is good, but also caused the price of FC1 too expensive to fly from the Air Force and the price could not agree on the FC1 can be seen under the Air Force to replace the F-FC1 just want to let the price of 7 and q5 then FC1 can not be too expensive stand-alone F-7 and q5 of $ 500 to 800 square also, FC1 directly to the price soared to $ 1,500 to 25 million, have more than doubled the price is

Second is a matter of habit, is FC1 is designed in accordance with American standard, it is also Pakistan's operational thinking (from the United States), it plainly has a strong FC1 is a ground-to-sea combat forces as a fighter in decades when Chinese Air Force Air Defense Force, not used to such a fighter, so there is more accustomed to the F-10 fighter interceptor has a strong ability to general-purpose capabilities

Finally, FC1, although in 2003 but only recently began test is considered to achieve full status, the Air Force has four years of their study may also like, like, like the year such as JH-7.

But regardless of the FC1 equipment which are not equipped with the Chinese Air Force fighter an excellent lightweight Pakistan ordered plus 100 150 250 of the amount of intent from a few years is the absolute main FC1 Pakistan, after all, not a few stand F16

Please do not say that Pakistan's ability to nurture its own production equipment FC1 Maybe it was meant, but if FC1 poor equipment, I believe Pakistan will not always be in the brink of war in Pakistan, more than you know the demand for aircraft performance.
对换装RD93mA发动机后的FC1 期待(转载)_国际观察_天涯论坛
 
Hi,

During the 60's 70's the american had a major concern about the russian fighter aircraft---they were smokeless---OTOH---the american fighter aircraft smoked a lot---. They were curious and did not know what to do.

Any way a libyan pilot defects to israel with his russian aircraft---the air craft had jet fuel of russian origin. So the lab they sent to research the fule found out that the russian had some how used a process to mix natural gas molecules to jet fuel---and thru other processes elongated the molecular structure and made the molecules same size overall ( I am not a chemist )-----. Also the fuel did not have any sulphur impurities either.

Guess what happens later---the american jet fuel coming out after that discovery is smokeless.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom