Like i said, nobody else in the World accepts this revisionist history written by thieves
The issue is that the historians of whom you accuse to be thieves were, as a matter of fact, Orientalists!
As such, for them, to maintain a neutral stance had never been more imperative.
Thieves and savages roaming the desert fighting each other does not constitute a "kingdom" or "state".
The vast majority of Provinces reunited with one another without firing a single bullet. The only conflict which took place occur in the Central Region. The Norther, Western, Eastern, and Southern joined at will.
While in Iran Khomini had to slaughter 30 thousands Iranians when he came to power including military elites, politicians, and religious figures - which eventually had led to forcing the Iranian youngsters to clean up the minefields to your glorious army -
I wonder who's savage and who isn't.
No matter what you say, Saudi Arabia is a British invented "kingdom".
Yeah, they most certainly did.
The Brits never allied themselves with us, not until the Hashamite House in the Province of Hijaz diminished in 1927. By that time Hijaz reunited with the rest of KSA, and then the Brits came to recognize Saudi sovereignty over the Central Region, as well as Hijaz.
Treaty of Jeddah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Before that, there were just savages and bedouins fighting each other. But by all means, call them "kings" if you want. By your cheap lizard chewing standards they probably were.
Thankfully, our country has never been occupied by two Superpowers at once, unlike Iran which was occupied by the USSR, and the UK.
And thankfully, our country had never had a King been installed to serve his masters, overthrowing a government elected by its people, killing its Prime Minister.
And thankfully, our country has never seen a massacre by fellow Saudis against another fallow Saudis, unlike the Khomini's massacre which took the lives of 30 thousands Iranians.
And thankfully, our country has never used children as human shields to pick up the mines for our army, unlike Iran.
With all due respect, but not even a Saudi fingernail worths the entire nation of your kin and kind.
Like i said, nobody else in the World accepts this revisionist history written by thieves. Thieves and savages roaming the desert fighting each other does not constitute a "kingdom" or "state". No matter what you say, Saudi Arabia is a British invented "kingdom". Before that, there were just savages and bedouins fighting each other. But by all means, call them "kings" if you want. By your cheap lizard chewing standards they probably were!
Woman, please... No more of your stupidity. You obviously are a liar, because everybody knows that British made Saudi Arabia was founded in the 1930s. What happened before then with a bunch of savages fighting each other for lizards and pretending to be kings when all they were was thieves is not important. There was no "kingdom", just barbarians fighting each other and getting spanked by the Ottoman Turks. You can call them kings if you want, but nobody else in the World accepts this revisionist history written by thieves and collaborators.
Secondly, you are an idiot to claim that there was no British empire in the 18th century. Seriously, what lizard den have you been living in?
I don't see anything wrong of being a woman, if I really were. Maybe the concept of Mu'tah makes you see women as sexual mistress, but not there is a whole world out there which doesn't share the same view.
Nope, absolutely not. But i know it offends these "Saudis", the ultimate homo's and oppressors of women. Yet they'd love a camel and shower one with affection. Savages.
Nothing of an offense. Women are my mother, aunt, sister, daughter, and a friend. If being a woman is a disgrace then that would be a disgrace to the closet people to me. But I understand where is that coming from!
Iran is the only country in the world which encourages the sexual exploitation of women on a religious basis. Coming to domestic violence against women, I believe it exists everywhere. But to you, as an Iranian, I think you do have less to say when it comes to the treatment you offer to women:
Iranian Women Prisoners Detail Torture: 'Death Was Like a Desire' | PBS NewsHour
World: Violence Against Women -- In Iran, Abuse Is Part Of The Culture (Part 2)
Domestic Violence against Single and Married Women in Iranian Society | Azad Moradian - Academia.edu
Family of Iranian woman 'beaten to death by boyfriend', watch her die in hospital via internet | Mail Online
Family of Iranian woman 'beaten to death by boyfriend', watch her die in hospital via internet | Mail Online
Family watches online as Iranian woman dies in U.S. - NY Daily News
http://www.rdfi.org/index.php?optio...ary-servitude&catid=39:child-labour&Itemid=54
So his highness, is being a woman something to be ashamed of to be used as an insult?
It doesn't matter who am I. If calling someone a woman by an Iranian proves something, then this shows how civilized the average " Persians " are.
