What's new

Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

which could happen as soon as next couple on months
Iranian conventional weapons are weak as hell. Iran's air force is backdated with backdated aircrafts. Only strategic missile system and nukes can save Iran.

Follow North Korea. They have poor army but good missile base.
 
.
Iranian conventional weapons are weak as hell. Iran's air force is backdated with backdated aircrafts. Only strategic missile system and nukes can save Iran.

Follow North Korea. They have poor army but good missile base.
i myself am in favor of nuclear Iran for years
 
. .
Iranian conventional weapons are weak as hell. Iran's air force is backdated with backdated aircrafts. Only strategic missile system and nukes can save Iran.

Follow North Korea. They have poor army but good missile base.

You sound like a little turd trole... why are you hanging around the Iranian forum and wasting people´s time with your crap?

Get lost to where you come from and mind your own country´s affairs
 
.
Iranian conventional weapons are weak as hell. Iran's air force is backdated with backdated aircrafts. Only strategic missile system and nukes can save Iran.

Follow North Korea. They have poor army but good missile base.
Well my friend I guess that like a lot of things it depends on ones definition of "poor" or "weak".For instance,look at saudi and the gulf states they have spent [squandered] hundreds of billions of dollars collectively on the best weapons that their western overlords would sell them,yet they were ultimately fought to a complete standstill in yemen by the remnant of one of the poorest militaries in the region allied with a militia and armed for the most part with weapons supplied decades ago during the cold war.
Ultimately its just as important as to how one uses ones weapons as to how new they are,in addition theres more than one way to achieve a desired military outcome ie precision guided ballistic missiles vs manned aircraft.
Lastly who exactly does iran need to be "saved" from anyway?,is it the arabs....?,I`m sure pretty much everyone remembers what happened to the last dumb-son-of-an-arab who tried his luck there,he wound up bled white and bankrupted to the point that he couldnt even service the interest payments on the tens of billions of dollars in loans he had to take out just to stay on the defensive.Ultimately tho he turned on his neighbor and former ally kuwait.....and the rest as they say was history.
As for the israelis,well its pretty obvious that despite all of netanyahoos bluster he isnt willing to risk a war with iran over its presence in syria let alone attack iran directly.
Now that just pretty much leaves america of course,but even there there seems to be little appetite for risking a war with iran,I mean strangely despite trump threatening to attack dozens of sites all over iran if it dared to so much as retaliate in any way at all against us forces in iraq for the murder of soleimani,yet when push came to shove and iran hit ain al assad and the us forces stationed there.......guess what..,thats right trump backed down merely tweeting "alls well".So it doesnt look like any of irans enemies want to risk an actual war with it for some strange reason,I wonder why........?:unsure::undecided:
 
. .
If Iran already has a 4000 km IRBM then it can hit Entire Europe in the West and South East Asia in the East.

Iran's current missiles already covers Turkey, Russia in the West and India in the East.

However Saudi has IRBM and possibly ICBMs too.
are you trying to compare Iranian BM capability and competency against that of Saudis???? if you dont choose Iran you chose the losing side. Just saying..Iran is VERY familiar and used to missiles, way more than the Saudis are...

Possession and proficiency are 2 separate things.
 
. .
are you trying to compare Iranian BM capability and competency against that of Saudis???? if you dont choose Iran you chose the losing side. Just saying..Iran is VERY familiar and used to missiles, way more than the Saudis are...

Possession and proficiency are 2 separate things.
images (13).jpeg


images (1).jpeg


Saudi ballistic missiles. It looks like these are IRBMs. Not sure though.
 
. .
. .
Iranian conventional weapons are weak as hell.
Lol....says someone who doesnt know much about Iranian military capabilties. Iran possesses at least decent capabilities in any military sphere, just mention it. Iran's conventional weapons have deterred the world's sole superpower till date, so they have proven their worth through action, so talk is cheap.
Iran's air force is backdated with backdated aircrafts.
Um...over generalization...because maybe you dunno too much about it. Iran still possesses a sizeable and potent airforce...problem is, you dunno the full story since decades ago...many have been brought back to active duty status, many have been upgraded, new weapons have been developed...but i dont think you say any of this, and thats why you're saying this false BS.
Only strategic missile system and nukes can save Iran.
Well Iran has them....and thats not all Iran needs..Iran also needs strong ground forces....how can it actually prevent or stall an invasion? you think Iran will only have ot fire missiles during a war? Iran will need alot of type sof military support domestically to sustain any war effort.
Follow North Korea. They have poor army but good missile base.
Can Iran also follow North Korea to the Chinese surplus funding opportunity also??? Dont tell half stories...Russia and China have helped North Korea in all spheres, even under these stringent UN sanctions..but they haven't given Iran similar support, because doing so doesnt support their direct interests as much as supporting North Korea does..different realities, so its apples and oranges comparison you're doing here.
 
. .
Lol....says someone who doesnt know much about Iranian military capabilties. Iran possesses at least decent capabilities in any military sphere, just mention it. Iran's conventional weapons have deterred the world's sole superpower till date, so they have proven their worth through action, so talk is cheap.

Um...over generalization...because maybe you dunno too much about it. Iran still possesses a sizeable and potent airforce...problem is, you dunno the full story since decades ago...many have been brought back to active duty status, many have been upgraded, new weapons have been developed...but i dont think you say any of this, and thats why you're saying this false BS.

Well Iran has them....and thats not all Iran needs..Iran also needs strong ground forces....how can it actually prevent or stall an invasion? you think Iran will only have ot fire missiles during a war? Iran will need alot of type sof military support domestically to sustain any war effort.

Can Iran also follow North Korea to the Chinese surplus funding opportunity also??? Dont tell half stories...Russia and China have helped North Korea in all spheres, even under these stringent UN sanctions..but they haven't given Iran similar support, because doing so doesnt support their direct interests as much as supporting North Korea does..different realities, so its apples and oranges comparison you're doing here.
Most Iranian fighter jets are from the Shah Pahlavi era. Su-24, Chengdu J7, Mirage F-1 etc these are old aircrafts.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom