What's new

Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

. .
I think it was using them... need to check the exact wording.
also he might change his fitwa in private. who knows?

No.

1) In October 2019, Ayatollah Khamenei explained his view that using nuclear weapons is haram, but also that building and stockpiling them is wrong.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-i...forbidden-under-its-religion-tv-idUSKBN1WO15H

Building and stockpiling nuclear bombs is wrong and using it is haram (religiously forbidden) ... Although we have nuclear technology, Iran has firmly avoided it,” State TV quoted him as saying.

2) Ulema do not revise fatwas in private.
 
Last edited:
.
The Khorramshahr is allegedly related to the North Korean Hwasong-10 IRBM also called the Musudan 4 or BM-25. I'm guessing Iran contributed to the funding and research of the Hwasong-10, among other projects, and therefore reaped the rewards. Others say Iran purchased 18 Hwasong-10 missile sets from North Korea in 2005. Really who knows.

Some sources list the Khorramshahr as having a 1800 kg warheads with a range of 1000-2000
The Hwasong-10 is listed as having a 650-1250 kg warhead with a range of 3000-4000 km

Correct me if I'm mistaken but isn't it less a matter of fuel and more a matter of the size of the warhead which directly effects the range ? I'm assuming some missiles in Iran's arsenal have various sized warheads, with larger warheads reducing the range ?

Assuming a 650 kg conventional warhead at a range of 4000 km, with a decent margin of error, this would make the Khorramshahr more a weapon of terror than anything else. Of course in a city center with skyscrapers, even a dozen such missiles, especially with a submunitions (multiple warheads) can be absolutely devastating. It basically gives Iran the option to say to the Europeans or a potential rival "You bomb my country I'll bomb yours"

In my opinion Iran should stop beating around and bush and just come out with an ICBM or something much beefier than the Khorramshahr. They can still claim the ranger is 2500 KM I suppose.

However I'm guessing that Iran will not publicly display such a weapon since it would definitely help boost the American narrative about Iran being a threat and undermine Iran's efforts to purchase advanced fighter jets and weapons from Russia and China.
The beauty of the khorramshar is that it effectively gives iran the best of both worlds in terms of delivery systems.Iran can quite convincingly claim that it is intended to be used as a purely medium ranged missile with the ability to carry a very large payload,in reality this is probably more likely to be something like 3 emad terminally guided warheads rather than one massive warhead.However it also gives iran a potential intermediate ranged nuclear delivery system with the capability to reach well into western europe carrying say a 300-500kg thermonuclear warhead.
By comparison building an icbm would leave you with little to no plausible deniability as it would be very obvious what it was and what it would likely be intended for.
 
. . .
.
thanks you know what im taking about
According to many sources, the Korean Mining and Development Trading company is responsible for providing nuclear and missile assistance to Iran. The picture below states that Iran buy North Korean products.

Screenshot_2020-08-19-01-59-10-133_com.android.chrome.png
 
.
Pakistani scientist Dr Abdul Qadir Khan

Pakistan scientist Dr Abdul Qadir Khan was big ZERO when it comes to Iran nuclear........ program. just smok screen to keep IAEA busy for 15 years.
google sreach Vyacheslav Danilenko former soviet thermonuclear weapon expert.


https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/the-...ons-and-treasons.427176/page-68#post-11602044




this is United Nation nuclear agency not me

First
UNSCR 2231 has recognized iran as nuclear power if you should know . to educate yourself please google search nuclear power country so find out what it mean by international law to understand it does not mean at all nuclear electricity .
UN website NOT ME
resolution 2231 (2015) - the United Nations
http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/2231(2015)


2nd: The 2011 IAEA Iran report : the 1990 Marivan large-scale nuclear test .
which guess what U.S has provided to IAEA the satellite pictures .
this is IAEA websilte NOT ME
https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/gov2011-65.pdf

3rd: also known as PMD ( previous military dimension )

Frontline- April 13, 1993 (Iran and the Bomb)

++++++

Iran Exploding-bridgewire Wire detonator (EBW)
EBW references from IAEA Board of Governors’ reports
http://www.atomicreporters.com/2014/02/iran-new-developments-exploding-bridge-wire-ebw/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploding-bridgewire_detonator

++++++

Project Midan: Developing and Building an Underground Nuclear Test Site in Iran
http://isis-online.org/isis-reports...uilding-an-underground-nuclear-test-site-in-i

The secret part the Iran nuclear deal with US ( JCPOA )
U.S John kerry told IAEA not to publish the photos,
Obama's secret Iran deals exposed

+++++

People just google sreach Vycheslav V. Danilenko former Soviet scientist nuclear weapons expert .
our program had multi ................route, it would been even unwise and unreliableto to only relay one route, and follow one rute. and if you follow and study IRI Iran they are never interested in anything that the China offers them and always after Russian or western technology .
AQ Khan in our program was big zero compared to soviet union Vycheslav V. Danilenko thermonuclear weapon experts . AQ Khan was IAEA ghost chess before Israeli American quote Iran with real stuff

Vycheslav V. Danilenko former Soviet scientist nuclear weapons expert then you come to realization that Abdul Qadeer Khan story has almost zero rule in Iran program and AQ Khan it was just smoke screen cover up to keep IAEA busy by iranians to be used before we (iran ) got quote red handed

Vyacheslav Danilenko
NOT ME it is IAEA
he November 8, 2011 International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards report on Iran identifies a foreign expert that may have been important to Iran’s development of implosion detonation systems used in nuclear weapons. The Agency writes in the report that it has “strong indications that the development by Iran of the high explosives initiation system, and its development of the high speed diagnostic configuration used to monitor related experiments, were assisted by the work of a foreign expert who was not only knowledgeable in these technologies, but who, a Member State has informed the Agency, worked for much of his career with this technology in the nuclear weapon programme of the country of his origin.”

Information in other IAEA documents reviewed by ISIS identifies this person as Vycheslav V. Danilenko1. Born in 1934, Danilenko worked in the nuclear weapon complex at VNIITF, Chelyabinsk-70 for three decades. At VNIITF in the early 1960s, he was a member of the gas dynamics group and became involved in the study of the manufacture of synthetic diamonds. He worked with leading explosives experts in the Soviet nuclear weapons program and developed understanding of the fundamentals of detonation, including shock compression. In 1960, the head of VNIIF, B. I. Zababakhin, launched the institute’s research into the possibility of diamond synthesis by using the shock compression of graphite. Leading Soviet nuclear weapons experts were leaders in this effort in the early 1960s. In a recent book chapter Danilenko says that “experiments aimed at developing methods for synthesis were highly classified; for security reason, the results were initially contained only in secret reports from VNIITF.”2 According to IAEA officials, he likely had knowledge of the application of high explosives in the Soviet nuclear weapons program. Given his background and experience, this ex-Soviet nuclear weapons expert was well versed in key aspects of developing nuclear weapons.

Danilenko also has experience in the important area of the diagnostics of high explosions. His publications include work on high-speed photography and describe optical techniques by which fiber optic cables are used to capture the time of arrival of explosive shock waves.

After leaving VNIITF in either 1989 or 1991, Danilenko moved to Ukraine and established the company ALIT in Kiev, producing ultra-dispersed diamonds (UDD or nanodiamonds). He experienced economic difficulties by the mid-1990s. According to the IAEA, he contacted the Iranian embassy in mid-1995, offering his expertise on UDD. At the end of the year, he was contacted by Dr. Seyed Abbas Shahmoradi, who headed the Physics Research Center and also worked at the Sharif University of Technology.3 Danilenko signed a contract with Shahmoradi, according to IAEA documents.


+++++




Thanks to Obama for PMD

before Yukio Amano IAEA chief visit to Iran suddenly floods in Tehran province and Parchin area
Sep 20, 2015

then
samples taken by Iranian experts from Parchin military site with no IAEA inspectors present before close IAEA PMD case \ basically Iran curry out inspection itself and guess what Iran came out clean

and then

IAEA Board of Governors closes Iran PMD case




CNN news analysis North Korea nuclear weapon program and miniaturization in 2013
people can draw their own conclusions


connect dots together then people can get good Idea where Iran nuclear program is and how it has come about
 
Last edited:
. .
actually Iran did its first nuclear underground test almost 10 years before North Korea
I think Iran should conduct open nuclear test now because it won't make a difference.

Saudi, America, Israel will hate Iran regardless of whether Iran has nukes or not. It doesn't make a difference because Iran will always be under US sanction so better Iran declare that it has nuclear weapons. On the contrary Iran's reputation might increase in the Islamic world due to nukes.
 
.
I think Iran should conduct open nuclear test now because it won't make a difference.

Saudi, America, Israel will hate Iran regardless of whether Iran has nukes or not. It doesn't make a difference because Iran will always be under US sanction so better Iran declare that it has nuclear weapons. On the contrary Iran's reputation might increase in the Islamic world due to nukes.
You make a good point,however I think that for iran the acquisition of nuclear weapons should only be as a means to an end,not simply an end in itself.
 
.
I think Iran should conduct open nuclear test now because it won't make a difference.

Saudi, America, Israel will hate Iran regardless of whether Iran has nukes or not. It doesn't make a difference because Iran will always be under US sanction so better Iran declare that it has nuclear weapons. On the contrary Iran's reputation might increase in the Islamic world due to nukes.
i agree but sorry no can do, NTP
 
. . .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom