this lines from the article reiterate Iran claims that those missiles are not designed to carry nukesFrance, Germany and UK reiterate claim that Iran has nuclear-capable ballistic missiles
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/12/05/middleeast/iran-nuclear-ballistic-missiles-intl-hnk/index.html
By that same idiotic analogy you could claim that basically iran could use any of its aircraft as a potential nuclear delivery system,yet I notice that they DONT try and claim that irans aircraft ARE nuclear capable despite both the f4 and su24 having this capability in us and soviet service respectively,I wonder why?.France, Germany and UK reiterate claim that Iran has nuclear-capable ballistic missiles
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/12/05/middleeast/iran-nuclear-ballistic-missiles-intl-hnk/index.html
By that same idiotic analogy you could claim that basically iran could use any of its aircraft as a potential nuclear delivery system,yet I notice that they DONT try and claim that irans aircraft ARE nuclear capable despite both the f4 and su24 having this capability in us and soviet service respectively,I wonder why?.
In addition the shahab 3 and its ghidir 110 successors were derived from the dprks indigenous rodong missile,this missile unlike its 1950s era soviet scud cousins was never designed with the carriage of nuclear warheads as its primary purpose and indeed was designed only with the carriage of a conventional ie high explosive payload,there never was a nuclear warhead developed for it because at the time of its development in the 1990s the dprk was not yet a nuclear power.
Basically just more stupid pathetic eurovassal bullsh!t....You`d think that they`d have better things to do at this point......maybe like saving the jcpoa for instance.
Oh well,I suppose that just as "stupid is as stupid does" so to Vassals are as vassals do.
There is nothing in the JCPOA that dictates any restriction on Iran's missile capabilities. This is a pile of manure!By that same idiotic analogy you could claim that basically iran could use any of its aircraft as a potential nuclear delivery system,yet I notice that they DONT try and claim that irans aircraft ARE nuclear capable despite both the f4 and su24 having this capability in us and soviet service respectively,I wonder why?.
In addition the shahab 3 and its ghidir 110 successors were derived from the dprks indigenous rodong missile,this missile unlike its 1950s era soviet scud cousins was never designed with the carriage of nuclear warheads as its primary purpose and indeed was designed only with the carriage of a conventional ie high explosive payload,there never was a nuclear warhead developed for it because at the time of its development in the 1990s the dprk was not yet a nuclear power.
Basically just more stupid pathetic eurovassal bullsh!t....You`d think that they`d have better things to do at this point......maybe like saving the jcpoa for instance.
Oh well,I suppose that just as "stupid is as stupid does" so to Vassals are as vassals do.
What makes this so especially fvcking retarded even by the usual standards of gross western hypocrisy is that they are using the MTCR definitions which is an agreement,NOT A TREATY,that iran is NOT EVEN A MEMBER OF!!.By that same idiotic analogy you could claim that basically iran could use any of its aircraft as a potential nuclear delivery system,yet I notice that they DONT try and claim that irans aircraft ARE nuclear capable despite both the f4 and su24 having this capability in us and soviet service respectively,I wonder why?.
In addition the shahab 3 and its ghidir 110 successors were derived from the dprks indigenous rodong missile,this missile unlike its 1950s era soviet scud cousins was never designed with the carriage of nuclear warheads as its primary purpose and indeed was designed only with the carriage of a conventional ie high explosive payload,there never was a nuclear warhead developed for it because at the time of its development in the 1990s the dprk was not yet a nuclear power.
Basically just more stupid pathetic eurovassal bullsh!t....You`d think that they`d have better things to do at this point......maybe like saving the jcpoa for instance.
Oh well,I suppose that just as "stupid is as stupid does" so to Vassals are as vassals do.
View attachment 593270
What's clear is that it uses an open cycle engine so not very advanced in terms of design and both Iran and North Korea have way's to go in terms of engine designs
(Putting your Turbine exhaust back into your compressor allows you to both burn any unburnt fuel back into the combustion chamber and run compressors with more fuel = higher speeds since that fuel wouldn't be waisted anyways and with full flow cycle your basically blasting fuel and oxidizer into the combustion chamber thus achieving far greater thrust with full flow staged combustion cycles designs basically imagine 2 jet engines that rather than compressed air one blast fuel and the other oxidizer into the combustion chamber)
So in terms of Rocket engine design North Koreans have ways to go and so do we!
