Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is amazing accuracy! Who needs bombers with this kind of accuracy?It is not clear yet, but it seems that the fateh 110 and the Fajr 5 guided missile have been used
Could they be Ya Ali cruise missiles? You can see one of the missile trusters going off rout in one of the videosWrong!
This was IRGC Ground Forces operations aka IRGC Army.
Fateh 110 and BM’s are in control of IRGC Aerospace Command.
Furthermore, from the Instagram videos you can clearly see smoke trails and a low altitude ROCKET both while en route and upon launch from an MLRS like systems
Fateh-110 take a parabolic launch and launch at a much steeper angle.
Furthermore, they wouldn’t be recorded in flight as they traveling certainly with no smoke trail, because they are quasi-BM and thus reentrying at Mach 5+
This is amazing accuracy! Who needs bombers with this kind of accuracy?
Could they be Ya Ali cruise missiles? You can see one of the missile trusters going off rout in one of the videos
اختصاصی: اطلاعات جدید از عملیات موشکی سپاه علیه تروریستها در اربیل/ شلیک ۷ فروند موشک فاتح۱۱۰ از فاصله ۲۲۰کیلومتری
به گزارش خبرنگار دفاعی خبرگزاری تسنیم، روز گذشته سپاه پاسداران انقلاب اسلامی با 7 فروند موشک زمین به زمین کوتاهبرد فاتح 110 ــ B، مواضع تروریستهای حزب دموکرات کردستان را با موفقیت هدف قرار داد.
این عملیات مهم، توسط یگان موشکی نیروی هوافضای سپاه انجام شده است و همزمان پهپادهای نیروی زمینی سپاه پاسداران نیز در آن مشارکت داشتهاند.
تصاویر و فیلمهایی که توسط تروریستها از این عملیات موشکی منتشر شده است، نشان میدهد که موشکهای با دقت بسیار بالا به اهداف اصابت کرده و منجر به هلاکت بسیاری از سران و نیروهای این گروهک تروریستی شده است.
http://tn.ai/1824221
Guess @VEVAK was right, I was incorrect
F-110 was used. Unless this video is about a different operation, my Farsi isn’t that great.
This is amazing accuracy! Who needs bombers with this kind of accuracy?
Could they be Ya Ali cruise missiles? You can see one of the missile trusters going off rout in one of the videos
در صد خطا که بالاستThey were the Fatteh-110's and Iran fired 7 missiles and only 3 landed where they were spose too plus they were fatteh110 one the most accurate Ballistic Missile in our arsenal just imagine if we had to fire 7 missiles at single terrorist compound to simply take out a section of that facility how many missiles at an Air Force bases over 700km from Iranian soil would it take to disable an Air Base?
And that's why Iran needs Bombers, strike aircraft & Air Superiority fighters to protect them! Not for targets within ~500km of Iran but for targets beyond! FYI a Single F-4 flown from Tabriz Could have dropped up to 18 500lb PGM's that would have wiped out that entire facility
Now if Iran could build a large enough fleet of UCAV's that can fly most of the way autonomously and deliver sufficient payload per sortie with a combat radius of 1000km then yes
No please look through the forums stop spread misinformation. There were two seperate regions:در صد خطا که بالاست
در صد خطا که بالاست
No please look through the forums stop spread misinformation. There were two seperate regions:
: 1.
The castle: footages show the direct hit in thr intended regions, look at the hit cluster density
2. Some other region which received direct hits but a much sparser cluster. This is visible from the footage that shows 3-4 smoke clouds rising at distance from.each other.
بعضی ها می گن تعداد شلیک ها بیشتر از این بوده ..Doorosteh ballast! But its normal and it is not a problem specific to Iran rather a general problem with Ballistic Missiles!
CEP's of ballistic missiles like this are usually calculated by ~50% of your missiles missing hell even Air to Air missiles and SAM's if possible and there aren't too many targets they are usually fired in tandem against a single target
Although with newer missiles they have reduced that percentage but still there are too many things that could go wrong especially with Ballistic Missiles because even today in modern countries with SLV's that don't have to bother with reentry that have 100 people working on a single launch and a team of highly educated engineers inspecting every inch of the missiles and conduct various pre launch test, a team working on micro meteors & space debris, a team working on weather and atmospheric conditions, and various advanced sensors focused on a single launch… even than achieving an 80% success rate is a relatively high success rate for most countries
By the way according to VOA the American had made assurances to shoot down any Iranian missile that fly's into Iraqi Kurdistan and yet Iran managed to hit it's target
And at the very least it shows that if produced in a significant amount Iran can take out any target within 500km of Iranian soil but to make up for our lack of Airpower and to be able to take out Air bases using Missiles Iran would have to produce them at rates of ~1000 per year for each class Fatteh-110, Fatteh-313 & Zolfaghar with 100 Tel's per year for each class & 4-5 new large missile bases per year
A 50% success rate with Ballistic Missiles is a NORMAL success rate for BM and Iran fired 7 Missiles of which 2 were direct hits and another 2 fell within 20 meters of the Missiles intended CEP which I would count as half hits so 3 out of 7 total
Have you yourself seen any evidence to back up such claims?بعضی ها می گن تعداد شلیک ها بیشتر از این بوده ..
Doorosteh ballast! But its normal and it is not a problem specific to Iran rather a general problem with Ballistic Missiles!
CEP's of ballistic missiles like this are usually calculated by ~50% of your missiles missing hell even Air to Air missiles and SAM's if possible and there aren't too many targets they are usually fired in tandem against a single target
Although with newer missiles they have reduced that percentage but still there are too many things that could go wrong especially with Ballistic Missiles because even today in modern countries with SLV's that don't have to bother with reentry that have 100 people working on a single launch and a team of highly educated engineers inspecting every inch of the missiles and conduct various pre launch test, a team working on micro meteors & space debris, a team working on weather and atmospheric conditions, and various advanced sensors focused on a single launch… even than achieving an 80% success rate is a relatively high success rate for most countries
By the way according to VOA the American had made assurances to shoot down any Iranian missile that fly's into Iraqi Kurdistan and yet Iran managed to hit it's target
And at the very least it shows that if produced in a significant amount Iran can take out any target within 500km of Iranian soil but to make up for our lack of Airpower and to be able to take out Air bases using Missiles Iran would have to produce them at rates of ~1000 per year for each class Fatteh-110, Fatteh-313 & Zolfaghar with 100 Tel's per year for each class & 4-5 new large missile bases per year
A 50% success rate with Ballistic Missiles is a NORMAL success rate for BM and Iran fired 7 Missiles of which 2 were direct hits and another 2 fell within 20 meters of the Missiles intended CEP which I would count as half hits so 3 out of 7 total
@VEVAK you are making these analysis base on zero empirical evidence. You do not know where targets were and where impacts occured with respect to them. I saw footage of direct hit to building, front of it and back of it.