HariPrasad
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2013
- Messages
- 14,055
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
The most important question is what will India do by invading Pakistan? What is the benefit?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Recruit
At the end off the video they themselves make it clear that this policy is hard to take place successfullyWell, Pakistan and India now been Equal by Nuclear States....so if war happens India will be destroyed so much...because they are depending with their arms but forget we have Pak Army who never fear to die and always ready to serve you...
Well, Pakistan and India now been Equal by Nuclear States....so if war happens India will be destroyed so much...because they are depending with their arms but forget we have Pak Army who never fear to die and always ready to serve you...
Never gonna happen !!
The only reason :
This will lead to full scale war b/w two countries.
As a result nukes will be deployed.
And the whole world will see the worst destruction ever!
First we can develop more warheads other than nuclear which can be fully destructive for your forces close to our border and secondly moving most off your forces to our border in 72 hours is impossible by the time you reach our border most off our forces will be already on your borderFirst...Cold Start Doctrine is a Full Scale War Scenario.
Second..Only few days ago,one article based on US hypothesis on Indo-Pak war got posted which perfectly showed why "Pakistan's Tactical Nuke(or any other such weapons and threats to use it) is irrelevant"..you should study it first.
@Horus
as a moderator,shouldn't you post the article in the same Cold Start Doctrine thread than making a new one???
These doctrines and policies have better success on games and minds of fanboys. Reality is always different.At the end off the video they themselves make it clear that this policy is hard to take place successfully
First we can develop more warheads other than nuclear which can be fully destructive for your forces close to our border and secondly moving most off your forces to our border in 72 hours is impossible by the time you reach our border most off our forces will be already on your border
New Recruit
There is no more of such a thing as ' Cold start doctrine ' will be a more appropriate statement.Sorry to burst your bubble, but there is NO such thing as 'Cold Start Doctrine'. Period!
This was just an article written by a retired Indian Army brigadier a few years ago in a military journal and was promptly grabbed by headline seekers, especially the so called 'defence analysts' of Pakistan as well as the Pakistan Army.
This is total fiction of the Tom Clancy variety.
There is no more of such a thing as ' Cold start doctrine ' will be a more appropriate statement.
When it took 21 day to mobilize all the necessary "integrated groups", it failed miserably against it own objective of 48 hours. So, it is a failed doctrine, for which the Indian high military brass should be court martial-ed along with their Usraeli advisors for their demand of approval , they must have all been high on heroin and/or psychologically instable. It would have taken only the approval of the prime minister (luckily he was drug free) of the time to send India to stone age along with other nations in Asia, for what most people believe were false flag terrorist operations inside India... The Usraeli hand proved to be behind them through Usraeli drug traffickers.
you do understand the concept of "Cold Start",right??its not full mobilization within 72 hours.its about winning the war within 72 hours.the concept is not engaging troops and gets bogged down.the concept is somewhat a "Modern Blitzkrieg".destroy the force what needed to be destroyed.let entrenched and defensive structure of enemy intact,bypass them and occupy territory(limited).you do know about fighting enemy with ground of your choosing,right??revisit 71 war again.study the tactics.only this time,it'll be far more swift,far more synchronized,far more network-centric.
only recently,one article got posted where USA simulated similar war,where Pakistan used 2 tactical nukes,while India replied with 4 or more.it showed the futility to use tactical nukes.you should study it deeply,and discover the flaw.see,be it tactical or a megaton nuke,once used,all restriction will be "OFF".its not only India who'll retaliate,expect far larger response from other world powers as well.even if Pakistan stop the Indian Offensive,they'll be the ultimate loser,as in International Community then going to isolate and impose strict sanctions.Pakistan will become post WW-I Germany,just several times worse.
What is the Indian Cold Start Doctrine?
Cold Start Doctrine is an 'Exclusively Offensive' military strategy, recently developed by the Indian Military Command (IMC), specifically for Pakistan to replace the outdated 'Sundarji Doctrine' which miserably failed during 2001-2002 standoff with Pakistan.
According to Cold Start Doctrine, India plans to invade and defeat Pakistan just under 72 hours by utilizing quickly Mobilized Armored Units (MAUs) and airpower to formulate the Integrated Battle Groups (IBGs), which India believes would be enough to tear Pakistan into two, without starting a nuclear war.
This is like telling a guy in the US no to use his gun against an armed aggressor!
keep believing the US who preaches what it does not believe in... They are also the ones who have invented the tactical nuclear weapons with their SW 54 warhead from 10t to 1kt and deployed it in numbers. They must have seen some use to it...and calculated the escalation possibilities.
They are not in the same position anymore, so that applies to the European theater. They had their role in the cold war, so they must still be relevant in a cold war situation when one side can field more man and material on the battle field and try a forceful rolling armour attack on the other side , like it is the case of the "cold war" between India and Pakistan.do you know that all the powers found "Tactical Nuke" as redundant and they are simply phasing them out???
this one is USA's and Nato's plan....
The Case Against U.S. Tactical Nukes In Europe | Foreign Affairs