"increase efficiency" ??
This factory, altough it belongs to the Turkish Army, has been able to manufacture high tech military gears, weapons and proved itself with Fırtına howitzer.
On the other side,
49% of BMC belongs to Qatar Armed Forces
51% to Ethem sancak, another arap from Siirt.
Does not have any infrastructure to manufacture a tank such as Altay. So wants to buy tank-palet factory in order to be able to make Altay.
Do you think Qatar Army is better at factory management and more loyal to Turkey than TSK?
1. If BMC had no capability to make Altay, why it was given the tender?
2. If Altay could be manufactured in tank-palet factory, why not allow it to make so?
You said.... Milli ve yerli...?
Like I said in my previous post, Tank palet's competency isn't in question here. So them manufacturing high tech military gear isn't in question either. But despite that, you still insist on bringing that up. Increasing efficiency means exactly that, increasing efficiency. It's also stated that they want to expand tank palet (meaning more jobs and manufacturing) and that this expansion will be financed by the private sector:
Source:
http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/12/20181220-2.pdf
"1. If BMC had no capability to make Altay, why it was given the tender?"
Because SSB knows BMC is capable of building the Altay. The speculation surrounding BMC of not being capable is just that, speculation and is motivated by politics and is part of a smear campaign. SSB has a credibility that outweighs any speculation surrounding it, because SSB has proven itself for decades now.
"2. If Altay could be manufactured in tank-palet factory, why not allow it to make so?"
Because the goal is to increase efficiency of tank palet, as well as expanding it.
What do you think of the expansion goals for tank palet?
You are so against this move, so you must be against tank palet expanding right? You must hate tank palet so much that you don't even want tank palet to be more efficient, right? (see what I did there? I just wrote assumptions about you and speculated, just to make you look bad (similar to what is going on with the speculation surrounding this ordeal. I don't mean anything I wrote in the text that is underlined by the way, so don't be offended because I don't think or believe that you are anything like that)
51% of BMC is Turkish, and 49% is Arab according to you right? What if I told you (I know I have told you this before), even if BMC was 100% foreign owned, that it would still be a Turkish company? It's headquarters is in Turkey, pays taxes in Turkey, the bulk of their business is in Turkey. Which would make it Turkish. (senin burada yaptigin sermaye dusmanligi olmuyormu simdi?). TEI is also 49% owned by Americans, does that make TEI any less Turkish of a company?