What's new

Why Iran wouldn't last a few days against US

LMAO :lol:
They are going to use planes to use as GPS for their missiles and fighter planes?
The point is, once the satellites are hit, that is a severe blow to their communication. I can't make this any more simpler for you to understand.
and you're really retard, you're mixing up communication/navigation satellites, GPS is Navigation system not communication system/satellite, and do research on subjectbefore you bark here :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::crazy::crazy:
Layered defence means nothing if none of those missiles are truly capable of stopping a barrage of a particular missile.
Furthermore, even if we lived in a fantasy land where their ABD had a 100% success rate, Iran would simply oversaturate them with ease.
No system/ABM is 100% accurate but in layered defense if target missed from one ABM system the next one try to hit the target and that's LAYERED ABM is for :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::crazy::crazy::crazy:
 
LMAO :lol:
They are going to use planes to use as GPS for their missiles and fighter planes?
The point is, once the satellites are hit, that is a severe blow to their communication. I can't make this any more simpler for you to understand.



You don't need to @ me if you're already quoting my comment. :crazy:

Layered defence means nothing if none of those missiles are truly capable of stopping a barrage of a particular missile.
Furthermore, even if we lived in a fantasy land where their ABD had a 100% success rate, Iran would simply oversaturate them with ease.

I never really got the obsession that those posting on here have with ABM systems, they come off as fanatics praising wonder weapons that can evidently intercept 100% OF EVERYTHING (where as the more level headed thinkers of this god forsaken site give more plausible analysis that say that the systems won't fair that well against advanced missiles/maneuvering warheads or MRAV's like the ones Iran is fielding and at the quantity Iran is going to fire them off at). If one didn't have a deeper knowledge about missile types and ABM systems you would be completely forgiven in thinking that the Patriot and THAAD, David Sling, S-300/S-400 is fully capable of intercepting 100% of incoming projectiles lmao.

There is always a give and take, always.
 
and you're really retard, you're mixing up communication/navigation satellites, GPS is Navigation system not communication system/satellite, and do research on subjectbefore you bark here :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::crazy::crazy:

Satellites are used for both navigation AND communication. If you're too braindead to understand what I am saying, then don't embarrass yourself.

No system/ABM is 100% accurate but in layered defense if target missed from one ABM system the next one try to hit the target and that's LAYERED ABM is for :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::crazy::crazy::crazy:

It seems I have to keep repeating and dumbing things down for you so you can understand. Let me repeat this, if their layered systems cannot defeat a missile, it does not matter if they have a 100 layers.

I never really got the obsession that those posting on here have with ABM systems, they come off as fanatics praising wonder weapons that can evidently intercept 100% OF EVERYTHING (where as the more level headed thinkers of this god forsaken site give more plausible analysis that say that the systems won't fair that well against advanced missiles/maneuvering warheads or MRAV's like the ones Iran is fielding and at the quantity Iran is going to fire them off at). If one didn't have a deeper knowledge about missile types and ABM systems you would be completely forgiven in thinking that the Patriot and THAAD, David Sling, S-300/S-400 is fully capable of intercepting 100% of incoming projectiles lmao.

There is always a give and take, always.

These people are probably bunch of kids. They don't understand these basic things.
 
Satellites are used for both navigation AND communication. If you're too braindead to understand what I am saying, then don't embarrass yourself.
and GPS is only navigation you dumb troll google it @WinterNights
It seems I have to keep repeating and dumbing things down for you so you can understand. Let me repeat this, if their layered systems cannot defeat a missile, it does not matter if they have a 100 layers.
You are really really retard, you know what is cooperative engagement capability to overcome multiple threats, you retard @WinterNights
These people are probably bunch of kids. They don't understand these basic things.
you're kid, that insist his crap again and again @WinterNights
 
You donkeys have been making statements like this for decades. If it's that easy, let them make a move then.

Don't be foolish

The twelver regime has been on shaky legs for a long time. The average Iranian is Persian first then Twelver second. Once the US-Saudi coalition takes the oil and the high ground your nation's economy will be that of afghanistan's - a complete ruin. With a depleted IRGC unable to protect them and an increasingly Hungry populace the regime in Tehran will fall quicker than your average domino.
 
Iraq had a very large and well-equipped force by 1990, and Saddam Hussein's decision to commit to a full-scale confrontation with US proved disastrous for his country regardless.
honestly , what was the Highway of Death in the first Persian gulf war, perhaps in your dictionary it means committing to full scale war ?
 
The result would be the same as Iraq. Their air power and traditional military will be decimated; initial occupation elements would be successful but then a deadly guerrilla war would ensue and the US will be stuck there for another 30 years.

But then it would be right into central asia and right next to Pakistan(its next neutralization if neo-cons have their way)
 
US aircraft carrier seen as barometer of tensions with Iran
By JON GAMBRELL | Associated Press
  • ContentBroker_contentid-06090d994e9c4ad3b5950739cc9cb041-1.png

    next
    Image 1 of 2


    ADDS LOCATION - In this Sunday, May 19, 2019, photo released by the U.S. Navy, sailors partake in a foreign object and debris walk-down on the flight deck of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln in the Arabian Sea. (Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Garrett LaBarge/U.S. Navy via AP)


DUBAI, United Arab Emirates – Ordered by the White House to the Persian Gulf, the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier has become a 100,000-ton barometer of the tensions between Iran and the U.S.

So far, the Lincoln and its accompanying ships have yet to enter the gulf through the Strait of Hormuz. It has been filmed by the U.S. Navy on Friday carrying out exercises with other American warships in the Arabian Sea, which is over 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) away.


While U.S. military officials aren't publicly explaining the delay, it may be to calm nerves before the ships pass through the strait, a narrow waterway where Iran often shadows American vessels.

In December, about 30 Iranian Revolutionary Guard vessels trailed the USS John C. Stennis aircraft carrier and its strike group through the strait as Associated Press journalists on board watched. One small vessel launched what appeared to be a commercial-grade drone to film the U.S. ships.

Other transits have seen the Iranians fire rockets away from American warships or test-fire their machine guns. The Guard's small fast boats often cut in front of the massive carriers, running dangerously close to running into them.

The Guard has perfected so-called "swarm attacks" on carriers, with bomb-carrying drones and sea-to-sea and surface-to-sea missiles in its arsenal.

Iran has increasingly threatened to close the strait if it is unable to sell its own crude oil to the global market as a result of the U.S. pressure campaign following Washington's withdrawal a year ago from the 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers.

Any transit through the strait also carries the risk of a catastrophic mistake by either side spinning out of control. In 1988, a U.S. warship accidentally shot down an Iranian commercial airliner, killing all 290 on board.

https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-aircraft-carrier-seen-as-barometer-of-tensions-with-iran
 
Last edited:
Hah, No Chance!

You wrongly assume that a US-Saudi Miltiary intervention in Iran will be about occupying the whole nation and having M1 Abrams roll into Teheran. That is not the strategy nor the objective. The objective will be to wipe out the Mullah regime once and for all.

Iran is a paper tiger and all a joint US-Saudi Alliance need to do is take control of the Oil rich Khuzestan province, Persian Gulf coastline, Azerbaijan, Kurdish Areas of Western Iran and Baloch Areas of South East Iran. Then coordinate ground force actions with massive air strikes to destroy the Iranian Air force, Rocket Force, IRGC, Mullah Regime hideouts and palaces which won't be difficult for them to do considering the superior air power in play.

After that the Mullah regime will fall on its knees and the Iranian people will rise up to overthrow them. As the only targets would be the regime and that nasty IRGC force.

I would give it a couple of weeks to be perfectly honest
Lol! Please, you just contradicted your first paragraph with the rest of your imaginary plan. The areas you named almost add up to 30-40 percent of Iran territory.

US and Saudis and Emiraties and ....... Are fighting Yemen for almost 2 years now without success. And they are blaming Iran for their incompetence. You don't know what you are talking about and probably think asymmetrical warfare is about a bunch of guerilla warriors living in jungles and attacking enemy scouts.

You can give it a week if you like, why 2?

Read this maybe you learn something:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...-mother-all-quagmires/?utm_term=.39aa008fd404
 
Last edited:
MIDDLE EAST

Published May 20, 2019

Last Update 13 hrs ago

US aircraft carrier seen as barometer of tensions with Iran

By JON GAMBRELL | Associated Press

[https://a57-foxnews-com]

ADDS LOCATION - In this Sunday, May 19, 2019, photo released by the U.S. Navy, sailors partake in a foreign object and debris walk-down on the flight deck of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln in the Arabian Sea. (Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Garrett LaBarge/U.S. Navy via AP)

[https://a57-foxnews-com]

In this Sunday, May 19, 2019, photo released by the U.S. Navy, Boatswain's Mate Seaman Tabari Harvey, from Bellevue, Neb., stands watch as forward lookout on vulture's row aboard the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln in the Arabian Sea. (Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Garrett LaBarge/U.S. Navy via AP)

Continue Reading Below

Ordered by the White House to the Persian Gulf, the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier has become a 100,000-ton barometer of the tensions between Iran and the U.S.
So far, the Lincoln and its accompanying ships have yet to enter the gulf through the Strait of Hormuz. It has been filmed by the U.S. Navy on Friday carrying out exercises with other American warships in the Arabian Sea, which is over 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) away.
While U.S. military officials aren't publicly explaining the delay, it may be to calm nerves before the ships pass through the strait, a narrow waterway where Iran often shadows American vessels.
In December, about 30 Iranian Revolutionary Guard vessels trailed the USS John C. Stennis aircraft carrier and its strike group through the strait as Associated Press journalists on board watched. One small vessel launched what appeared to be a commercial-grade drone to film the U.S. ships.
Other transits have seen the Iranians fire rockets away from American warships or test-fire their machine guns. The Guard's small fast boats often cut in front of the massive carriers, running dangerously close to running into them.

Continue Reading Below

The Guard has perfected so-called "swarm attacks" on carriers, with bomb-carrying drones and sea-to-sea and surface-to-sea missiles in its arsenal.
Iran has increasingly threatened to close the strait if it is unable to sell its own crude oil to the global market as a result of the U.S. pressure campaign following Washington's withdrawal a year ago from the 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers.
Any transit through the strait also carries the risk of a catastrophic mistake by either side spinning out of control. In 1988, a U.S. warship accidentally shot down an Iranian commercial airliner, killing all 290 on board.
did u read pentagon analyse on iran usa war go read it and then come back but dont cry its ur pentagon analyse so plz dont say this s things about iran usa war

in 2002 we are very stronger than 2002
 
Back
Top Bottom