They were guys cheering RU or PKK in Afrin... doesn't mean the majority was on Board...
We will start offensive against HTS very soon. Other than that what will they say? I expect some dumb moves from SAA but nothing serious. The observation points are there to counter any try for advancing. In order to advance you must capture or surround the observation point. Both moves mean war that nobody wants.
So they need to breach the main point of the agreement. If they do it I am sure uncle Sam will be happy to initialize another chemical attack over civilians by our request and we could give the rebels some real equipment. Nobody want it to end that way. While everyone can get away with something we will just bomb Damascus together with the coalition and end it ugly.
Lets be realistic. Russia will not move for Idlib. Assad and Iran are the ones that are breaching agreements. Why would Russia even try to reach an agreement if they can bomb and invade whatever they want? Yes I imply that the last (not all) chemical attack was staged as many other attacks. Its just part of the game and nothing new. Again I am not saying that Assad never used such weapons but the last one was clearly a false flag.
That your own opinion for the last Chemical attack. And no it's not part of the game.
So bombarding of Turkey with ballistic missiles is with Russian approval? You got to be kidding me. Why would Russia need this? Why would Russia need risk the whole work in Syria that they done by confronting with Turkey? We even supply them with intelligence for target recognition. Your "if"s are starting to piss me off again. What if meteorite falls on Russia and Russia perish from the face of earth? Come on.
I didn't say you are disrespectful. I say that your "if"s as every time are just ridiculous. Your "if"s are pure speculations and far from reality. Every agreement that we made with Russia and is taking place is being respected. We will work with Russia against HTS but the borders of Idlib will be respected. Both sides want solution without arms and in order that process to start first the areas around Damascus and Homs must be cleaned from opposition as per agreement. With if this if that you are not helping. I understand your sympathy to the opposition and hate for the Russians and Assad but there is no need to question every action as if some armageddon will happen. Solution without arms will be reached between the opposition and Assad and the opposition will have chance to participate in that process because of these agreements. The opposition will never be strong enough to win militarily this conflict. If something happens that requires military intervention then the coalition will do it. They want Assad down as much as you want it. The agreements are there in order to keep the territorial integrity in Syria. Otherwise we can just occupy it and make it Turkish.
You started with the "if"sSee, that's how it should be.
And Yes, that's an Interesting opinion.
Last, what you have just done is also a "If"
An extrapolation of a current analysis of this situation.
If we continue with that logic every end will be WW3 and the end of the world Nobody wants the end of the world 
Hannibal is absolutely right and you, just like most of your patriotic compatriots here, afraid to accept the reality that RU calling the shots when it comes to de-escalation betrayal game.
We can heavily arm the rebels and we can call the US to the party in Idlib. We can together stage 1 or 2 chemical attacks and wage a war to Assad that's what we can do in the armageddon situation. They know that we can do it. We can work with Israel in south Damascus. We can turn a blind eye to YPG presence in their cantons and request peace treaty with them. All the coalition + Turkey + Israel working for the destroying of the Assad and the partition of Syria with directly involving of the Armed Forces of the states above. With the propaganda made by the fake chemical attacks who do you think the world will stand for? They are working with us because they do not want to see us against them. UN would support such move after the fabricated attacks. They will lose both Damascus and also the Kurds completely to the US. They know that Turkey have choices. Of course that is the armageddon scenario and I don't believe we will go to that point. The move you describe as betraying our proxies is saving them from sure death and strengthening Idlib pocket. By our efforts there is political process and FSA is participating in it because of us. The people of Ghouta and Douma were already doomed to death. We rescued them and we will rescue the ones that are in Foua and Kafarya. If you are so brave why we didn't saw you in Ghouta so you would not betray the cause? The thing that @HannibalBarca gave as advice is good. Turkey must build a base and send more soldiers to Idlib but I think that the purpose would be met if we clean HTS out. Everybody who think that Syria will continue to be the same and Assad will stay is idiot. After all the crimes he did this is just impossible and the Russians know it. The Russians want unity in Syria as we do. Unity means compromises from both sides and joint government. If not there are 2 variants:
