Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was providing a rough analogue that shooting down a UAV is possible with a decent SAM system, particularly when it is operating in isolation without considerable defensive measures/arrangements. However, this accomplishment does not tell much in regards to how the defenses of a country would fare in actual WAR with US (completely different matter altogether). Therefore, this accomplishment is not a wise extrapolation.Was just pointing out that this shootdown and the Yemeni one aren't comparable, but in any case I haven't been very active on the forum lately. Twitter is better for high-quality information now.
Sure, but I hardly think they would leave such a high value asset defenceless.
True.
It's good that he's not the war-mongering type, but I would say he's chickening out due to his constant and ham-fisted use of brinkmanship.
Informative, thanks for share. Absolutely high-end as I suspected.
A couple more:Informative, thanks for share. Absolutely high-end as I suspected.
I suspected 75+ KM strike range based on the information about where HALE was struck, and it is.
This stuff should not be taken lightly.
Man I can't wait for Bavar-373 to be put into operation
Well done for proving my point.
Should Iran give them so long time to quetly make a heavy build up ?That will the pinnacle of Iranian defence products, full stop. I can't wait. Surely only a few more months now... they've delayed it long enough.
If US use tactical nukes against you , what will you do ?Since WW2 no Nuclear power has been stupid enough to use a Nuke against another country for it's a weapon of no tactical value and the hell that would come down on you politically will be far worse than any strategic value.
However I personally think Iran at this point should leave the JCPOA, start installing IR-6 & IR-4(IR-2M) with enrichment as high as 35% and if the Americans still don't come to their scenes we should leave NPT and start a nuclear weapons program not because I believe we need them but simply as a response to U.S. behavior and U.S. actions against Iran needs to have consequences. And I wouldn't be saying this if the U.S. had stuck with the JCPOA for I don't really see much value in nuclear weapons especially at a time where everyone is heading towards higher number of smarter, smaller, lighter & more accurate ordinances
To me there is much more value in developing a 20 lb highly accurate independently powered munition or sub munition capable of flying inside a bunker and takeout an aircraft with no more than a few lb of explosives than a freaking nuke because then a single UCAV or Missile developed to disperse 50 of them can takeout as many as 50 aircrafts and 10-20 of those UCAV's or missiles would be enough to disable a good portions of most countries Air Forces. And if your going to spend vast amounts on a weapon systems that to me has far more value than any Nuke because if we ever get into a shooting war with Saudi Arabia or the U.S. it's not like we would be stupid enough to use nukes anyways
Thats right injun cu nt.
Since WW2 no Nuclear power has been stupid enough to use a Nuke against another country for it's a weapon of no tactical value and the hell that would come down on you politically will be far worse than any strategic value.
However I personally think Iran at this point should leave the JCPOA, start installing IR-6 & IR-4(IR-2M) with enrichment as high as 35% and if the Americans still don't come to their scenes we should leave NPT and start a nuclear weapons program not because I believe we need them but simply as a response to U.S. behavior and U.S. actions against Iran needs to have consequences. And I wouldn't be saying this if the U.S. had stuck with the JCPOA for I don't really see much value in nuclear weapons especially at a time where everyone is heading towards higher number of smarter, smaller, lighter & more accurate ordinances
To me there is much more value in developing a 20 lb highly accurate independently powered munition or sub munition capable of flying inside a bunker and takeout an aircraft with no more than a few lb of explosives than a freaking nuke because then a single UCAV or Missile developed to disperse 50 of them can takeout as many as 50 aircrafts and 10-20 of those UCAV's or missiles would be enough to disable a good portions of most countries Air Forces. And if your going to spend vast amounts on a weapon systems that to me has far more value than any Nuke because if we ever get into a shooting war with Saudi Arabia or the U.S. it's not like we would be stupid enough to use nukes anyways
New Recruit
some are jealous ! and some may be pro - taliban or wahhabis idiotsSeems pakistani brothers want an attack on Iran !
True...Nothing is unsinkable. But the point is difficulty, like how difficult it was to sink the USS Oriskany, a 1940s era aircraft carrier, and the ship was RIGGED for sinking...That's not the point .
At each time there are ships that's considered not sinkable but then shut will hit the fans .
Game to was built to not be sinkable but it sank.
Nothing is unsinkable .
We are perfectly fine if you do not believe US. After all, a few of your pilots believed and that is all that mattered.Pictures or didn't happened .
True...Nothing is unsinkable. But the point is difficulty, like how difficult it was to sink the USS Oriskany, a 1940s era aircraft carrier, and the ship was RIGGED for sinking...
But now you are looking at a modern hull that was designed from concept to resist sinking and a ship that can fight back.
We are perfectly fine if you do not believe US. After all, a few of your pilots believed and that is all that mattered.