Poll: Should Fashion & sexually suggestive content be allowed on a Defense Forum?

[Desert Fox]

why do you care about dalits i dont give an f to what happens in india other than occupied kashmir

Why not?? Why can't i so as little as care about Dalits and the 600 million toiletless indians when you and your fellow perverts from across the border can post something as irrelevant as sexually explicit content under the guise of so called "fashion"??

I think the millions of oppressed Dalits and 600 million toiletless indians are more important than a naked woman don't you think? That is unless of course one is a pervert who cannot help but express his perverted desires like yourself and your fellow perverts like @doppelganger and the fake "socialist" wannabe @jamahir

Funny how that fake socialist @jamahir advocates such "fashion" (read, explicit sexual material") when this entire fashion industry is a Capitalist enterprise. I always knew that guy wasn't a real socialist, just an imposter.

 

[Hyperion]

Chall bay salay fundo..... you and your emotional blackmails......

[TOOT-TOOT-CENSORED] you sound to me like an ugly hag, who never got married and entered menopause [\CENSORED-TOOT-TOOT]

Someone close this pathetic thread and send the aged desert fox from some other kingdom to kingdom-ban-dom!

Nahh, you're from team "im a pervert/rapist and proud" actually. If it were up to traitors like you, you would merge Pakistan with india.

Now, do us a favor and go back to your thread where you and your degenerate kind can jack off to women you will most likely never get in real life.

 

[Zibago]

Falah e Insaniyat Foundation (FIF) | Jamat'ud'Dawah Official English Website

Why not?? Why can't i so as little as care about Dalits and the 600 million toiletless indians when you and your fellow perverts from across the border can post something as irrelevant as sexually explicit content under the guise of so called "fashion"??

I think the millions of oppressed Dalits and 600 million toiletless indians are more important than a naked woman don't you think? That is unless of course one is a pervert who cannot help but express his perverted desires like yourself and your fellow perverts like @doppelganger and the fake "socialist" wannabe @jamahir

Funny how that fake socialist @jamahir advocates such "fashion" (read, explicit sexual material") when this entire fashion industry is a Capitalist enterprise. I always knew that guy wasn't a real socialist, just an imposter.

nope to me they have no importance their government is more interested in buying rafales so let them crap in the open i dont give a f@x

 

[VCheng]

WARNING: Explicit Content, do not click unless you are okay with this type of art. WARNING.

Art or not? A painting by Rembrandt:

Woman urinating under a tree, 1631 (etching) by Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn (1606-69) -Bridgeman Images - art images & historical footage for licensing

 

[Hyperion]

Dude, I don't have label you as anything...... you are an Arab wannabe......... everyone on this forum, other than you knows it........

Accept what you are...... that's first step towards redemption and / or treatment.

So not only are you a pervert but also a part time Mullah? And we have people like @Hyperion calling me a Mullah and Arab wannabe.

 

[Zibago]

Chall bay salay fundo..... you and your emotional blackmails......

[TOOT-TOOT-CENSORED] you sound to me like an ugly hag, who never got married and entered menopause [\CENSORED-TOOT-TOOT]

Someone close this pathetic thread and send the aged desert fox from some other kingdom to kingdom-ban-dom!

menopause ab samajh mein aye mood swings,high temper,yelling bhai rehnay do hormonal garbar hay

 

[waz]

@Desert Fox It's ok brother. One poster quite rightly pointed out that such threads do not attract a full scale flame wars which are associated with the toilet, rape, graphic war pics threads. It just turns into en endless slanging match, with people abusing posters on the basis of race, culture, religion and so on. Having posted on web forums since the mid 90's, I saw many lose every member as a result of these troll wars.
The "fashion" threads do not attract such trouble. To some they are tasteless, to some they are fun, most don't really care. But equating these to graphic war footage is not right, you would equate **** to such material, and you will often find the two go hand in hand on certain sites that I won't mention here.
As for how individual members behave, that's where you tag mods in and we will deal with the incidents.

 

[Desert Fox]

nope they recommend me to other parents cause i teach kids like a brother and a friend instead of just a teacher

You should also provide them the link to your thread while you're at it. I'm sure they won't even tolerate you glancing at their children unless they are mentally challenged.

 

[Hyperion]

Mate, read his carefully worded replies.......... he's nothing but a closet Talib........ if you don't get his real agenda here, consult @Irfan Baloch, he can give you an approximate mental profile for him............

@Desert Fox It's ok brother. One poster quite rightly pointed out that such threads do not attract a full scale flame wars which are associated with the toilet, rape, graphic war pics threads. It just turns into en endless slanging match, with people abusing posters on the basis of race, culture, religion and so on. Having posted on web forums since the mid 90's, I saw many lose every member as a result of these troll wars.
The "fashion" threads do not attract such trouble. To some they are tasteless, to some they are fun, most don't really care. But equating these to graphic war footage is not right, you would equate **** to such material, and you will often find the two go hand in hand on certain sites that I won't mention here.
As for how individual members behave, that's where you tag mods in and we will deal with the incidents.

 

[Zibago]

You should also provide them the link to your thread while you're at it. I'm sure they won't even tolerate you glancing at their children unless they are mentally challenged.

You should also provide them the link to your thread while you're at it. I'm sure they won't even tolerate you glancing at their children unless they are mentally challenged.

There is a difference between private and public life you act differently in different situations

 

[Desert Fox]

@Desert Fox It's ok brother. One poster quite rightly pointed out that such threads do not attract a full scale flame wars which are associated with the toilet, rape, graphic war pics threads. It just turns into en endless slanging match, with people abusing posters on the basis of race, culture, religion and so on. Having posted on web forums since the mid 90's, I saw many lose every member as a result of these troll wars.
The "fashion" threads do not attract such trouble. To some they are tasteless, to some they are fun, most don't really care. But equating these to graphic war footage is not right, you would equate **** to such material, and you will often find the two go hand in hand on certain sites that I won't mention here.
As for how individual members behave, that's where you tag mods in and we will deal with the incidents.

These threads attract perverted individuals, who despite being reported and banned on numerous occasions, still remain present and at their usual behavior. They have been reported for harassment by the female members on this forum but they still remain at large.

If a "fashion" thread with sexually explicit content can attract perverts, then im sure a graphic war thread will attract some sicko's who get turned on by that kinda thing, but as the defenders of the "fashion" threads themselves have said it is just an avoidable consequence. So why should all who want to see a first hand account of real modern warfare have to suffer because of a few sicko's?

That is, after all the same argument the resident perverts of pdf use to defend irrelevant threads like "fashion".

 

[waz]

Mate, read his carefully worded replies.......... he's nothing but a closet Talib........ if you don't get his real agenda here, consult @Irfan Baloch, he can give you an approximate mental profile for him............

Bro, I aim to keep good relations amongst my own people. if the guy is a liberal, mullah, ultra nationalist, socialist etc, I just hear them all out.

 

[waz]

These threads attract perverted individuals, who despite being reported and banned on numerous occasions, still remain present and at their usual behavior. They have been reported for harassment by the female members on this forum but they still remain at large.

If a "fashion" thread with sexually explicit content can attract perverts, then im sure a graphic war thread will attract some sicko's who get turned on by that kinda thing, but as the defenders of the "fashion" threads themselves have said it is just an avoidable consequence. So why should all who want to see a first hand account of real modern warfare have to suffer because of a few sicko's?

That is, after all the same argument the resident perverts of pdf use to defend irrelevant threads like "fashion".

Anyone harassing a female member will be gone, forever. Before any female poster steps in with x, y and z, you didn't tag me or report the incident to me.
The thing about graphic war footage is that its sexual equivalent (****) is indeed banned on this forum. You have folks posting up pictures of cosmetically pleasing planes, missiles, tanks etc. These posters do the same with models, actresses etc. But then there is an argument of women being treated as objects, but shouldn't that question be asked of the girls in the picture, who actually adore the attention?

@ All posters KEEP the personal insults out of this please, or I will close the thread.

 

[Shamain]

Whatever hyperion weirdo just go on with ur abuses. Like ihavent seen u foulmouthing.
And comprehension upto the mark , my foot!

Anyone harassing a female member will be gone, forever. Before any female poster steps in with x, y and z, you didn't tag me or report the incident to me.
The thing about graphic war footage is that its sexual equivalent (****) is indeed banned on this forum. You have folks posting up pictures of cosmetically pleasing planes, missiles, tanks etc. These posters do the same with models, actresses etc. But then there is an argument of women being treated as objects, but shouldn't that question be asked of the girls in the picture, who actually adore the attention?

Wow harassing female member will be gone forever.

Itna bara jhoot
Then what doppelcrap, jamahir and ranjeet are doing here.??
Heck the admins who had once put doppelcrap on perma ban in whatever thread for harassment allowed him back there much to one's shock.

No u dont have policies that u follow , fine , but atleast dont lie so profusely.

 

[Dubious]

Ok, before i proceed, i would want to make it clear that this poll is only for Pakistani members as this is a Pakistani Defence forum and ONLY Pakistanis shall decide what is and isn't permitted on this forum. Indians/non-Pakistanis shall not partake in this poll. If Indians/non-Pakistanis partake in this poll than their vote shall not be taken into consideration. ONLY Pakistani votes shall be considered.

Following content banned because they serve no purpose on a defence forum:

Toilet Threads/content is banned.

Violent content/war footage is banned.

Rape epidemic threads/contents are banned.

Religious threads/contents are banned.


The excuse for banning the above content is because they serve no purpose. Okay, fair enough. But what purpose do sexually suggestive threads serve? Besides allowing the perverts of the internet to gather in one place and rate women ugly and pretty based on their sexual urges? Is sexually suggestive content by any means relevant to the topic of defence, strategic and social affairs??

And above all, i think its unfair to indian women that their men can't help but drool over Pakistani women because they find their own women unattractive.


So, my question to my fellow Pakistanis is why should threads about india's open defecation problem, india's rape epidemic, india's greater than Africa poverty rate, and graphic war footage be banned (all of which are more relevant to strategic and social affairs then fashion and sexually suggestive content) while sexually suggestive threads and content are completely permitted when they SERVE NO PURPOSE whatsoever. Should not a Pakistani Forum represent the traditional values and beliefs of 200 million Pakistanis??

Honestly speaking you should have added 1 more option saying : no/ yes coz I am non Pakistani with itchy hands