Two nation theory claimed that Muslims on the subcontinent need a separate nation, without which they would be oppressed by the Hindu majority. It espoused the creation of a separate nation on the basis of religion and that religion itself was sufficient to unite people of the same religion.
The failure of which is well known.
Yes I very well know, it goes both ways, with RAW being blamed in your part of the country too..
I'll just bust some myths you seem to have.
In India we have people who look like Europeans, like hrithik roshan.
We have people who look like Africans down south, not all, but some.
We have people who look like Chinese, in the North East.
We have people who look middle eastern brown people in various states.
We have middle eastern white looking people in the northern hill states.
More than half of Pakistan's population, that is people from Punjab and sindh, are virtually indistinguishable from Indians.
A fact that is exploited by many expatriate Pakistanis in the US, by claiming they are Indian, to the avoid the stigma of terrorism associated with Pakistan.
Having spent some years in the US, I can personally attest to this fact and have lost count of the number of times I've seen Pakistanis claim to be Indian.
Regarding your 2/3 nation theory, religion was supposed to be a strong enough binding factor, to bind together Muslims of the subcontinent in a separate nation, under the two nation theory. History is witness to the failure of which.
