Secur
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2011
- Messages
- 10,119
- Reaction score
- 56
- Country
- Location
because all jamait e islami leaders Fareed Paracha ,Liaqat baloch and amir Jamait e islami karachi does not agree with Munawar hassan
secondly Munwar Hassan raised question not gave fatwa even told saleem safi that i am not a mufti if you can give answer to my question kindly do.
Thirdly ji told all "amals" "wrong doing" can not be undone which haqem ullah mehsud did and he will be accountable [religiously speaking]
fourthly even a person drown in flood or who died in accident is a shaheed[Fareed paracha] but does not mean is a janati. he is not even near to jihad martyr like pak army personnel giving life for country or jihad by pen or tongue or the Jiihad "bil nafas"
All the homage that media specially geo gives to army and the homage given by anp,mqm and ppp is known by all.
First of all , there was no need to go into so much details and other irrelevant stuff when I asked a tinny question there and sought an answer for that " Where do the liberals or secular come in between and how did my previous post hint at any of that which was nothing but strong criticism of this person ? " and instead of answering it and providing an explanation for the same old " liberal/secular " outburst , you are defending the head of the party who gave these treasonous statement twice and his party people . Its good that at least , there are some sane voices left in his party after he called the killed terrorist as " martyr " and when asked if the Pakistani soldiers killed with Taliban are , replied in negative . This is like burning the flag of the country and stomping over the graves of the people who laid down their lives for the country , maybe it looks like just a simple statement to you , but it points to something very dangerous - the growing Taliban support in these religious political parties if it wasn't there already and common people who didn't come out on the streets to protest/condemn them . Even if he didn't know it properly and it wasn't a " fatwa " , he shouldn't have spoken back then in the first place , let alone say such a big thing ! But what should one expect from a person who previously declared a terrorist a " martyr " and stands by it , even today , even religiously speaking , the honor and criteria for being a " martyr " isn't to terrorize/kill innocent people and get to heaven by any chance , before trying to clarifying his statement , think about this first , because these people have made the high ranks of " martyrdom " a joke now , maybe they should reopen the religious sacred texts and look at its true conditions and the rewards for it first . ISPR had to even say that they and the families of thousands of dead Pakistanis do not need endorsement from the Mullah .
Let me remind everybody again . What does he say now , will not matter . A simple backtracking or maybe an unconditional apology will not make us all forget what he said about the heroes of our country and how he praised the terrorists ! No , it will not . The damage is done and irreversible . Its just a symbolic thing to be said now , nothing more and nothing less , since the pressure from army and political parties is now mounting and it is more of a " compulsion " on him and deviation from his true stance . The T.V. channel didn't force him on gunpoint to answer this question , he could have merely said " No comments " and moved on , but he wanted to show his love for Taliban and he did , otherwise I have seen him keep his silence on different matters pertaining to religion and Governance in the past .
Last edited: