What's new

ISI Still Top One Following CIA#2 RAW#9

Why CIA was not aware about 9-11, may be .... :pleasantry:
After the 9/11 13 years back, how many attacks have been executed successfully in USA ? Zero. Now see that in context with Pakistan and then come up with a logic
 
What are the parameters here ?
Creating irritation in bordering countries hence bad image for country then indeed are successful
if protecting country from terror strikes and safeguarding people ,maintaining peace avoiding conflicts hence contributing to overall development of the country is a parameter then i highly doubt their intelligence
 
Days are fine but what about years,there are only 2 possibilities 1)either he is being protected or 2)ISI had no clue ,if it had no clue someone living so close to military establishment,i dont want to say anything further you can guess.


He was not active, he was living out his days in a windowless room and only came out to walk on the terrace at night. OBL doesn't give off radiation that he could be tagged and bagged without him ever being active, similarly you talk about 9/11 as days, those hijackers did not condense out of thin air and teleport into the cockpits of planes, they had been on American soil for months, some years, plotting and preparing.

After the 9/11 13 years back, how many attacks have been executed successfully in USA ? Zero. Now see that in context with Pakistan and then come up with a logic

That's because they do not have a domestic terrorism issue, if you want to level the playing field, then you might want to follow the performance of CIA's Afghan Station and then see how many attacks succeeded, the answer to your question will be, quite a few.
 
He was not active, he was living out his days in a windowless room and only came out to walk on the terrace at night. OBL doesn't give off radiation that he could be tagged and bagged without him ever being active, similarly you talk about 9/11 as days, those hijackers did not condense out of thin air and teleport into the cockpits of planes, they had been on American soil for months, some years, plotting and preparing.
Then how do CIA came to know about him? :o:
And why don't your army or ISI know about the American operation which done in your country which is even near to a military zone? Your radar and intelligence is too weak to detect 2 foreign military helis in your country? :crazy_pilot: thats really a shame
 
Then how do CIA came to know about him? :o:
And why don't your army or ISI know about the American operation which done in your country which is even near to a military zone? Your radar and intelligence is too weak to detect 2 foreign military helis in your country? :crazy_pilot: thats really a shame


They were stealth helicopters, a previously unknown technology. How do you expect that there would be a deterrent for something that technically doesn't exist as yet? This pretty much equates to asking the Germans in the trenches of WWI why they performed so poorly against British Armour at the Somme when it was introduced for the first time.
 
After the 9/11 13 years back, how many attacks have been executed successfully in USA ? Zero. Now see that in context with Pakistan and then come up with a logic

Oh God .... now a days people talk about logic but having comprehension problem at their part ...........

If ISI is SO good, why didn't they know Bin Laden was living in a huge compound right down the street from Pakistans' equivalent of West Point ? Or maybe..................:ph34r:
 
He was not active, he was living out his days in a windowless room and only came out to walk on the terrace at night. OBL doesn't give off radiation that he could be tagged and bagged without him ever being active, similarly you talk about 9/11 as days, those hijackers did not condense out of thin air and teleport into the cockpits of planes, they had been on American soil for months, some years, plotting and preparing.



That's because they do not have a domestic terrorism issue, if you want to level the playing field, then you might want to follow the performance of CIA's Afghan Station and then see how many attacks succeeded, the answer to your question will be, quite a few.
How can anyone live in a fort like windowless mansion with suspicious behavior just near a military installation without detected?
 
How can anyone live in a fort like windowless mansion with suspicious behavior just near a military installation without detected?


It was not "just near a military installation", it was 2 kilometers as the crow flies but over 6 kilometers from the closest route to the outer perimeter of the PMA, based in a civilian residency.
 
An Intelligence Agency, which could not stop disintegration of the country, could not detect the world's most wanted living near military academy, could not stop the unilateral action of a foreign military and cant stop the regular attacks. now that sounds like a #1 agency.:lol:
 
How can anyone live in a fort like windowless mansion with suspicious behavior just near a military installation without detected?
stop act like a kid or you? ISI know about OBL or not doesn't change the ranking, forget about ISI google out about RAW you got it on 9 or 10th position and I wonder why it's on even top ten!!
 
An Intelligence Agency, which could not stop disintegration of the country,

Not the responsibility of an Int Agency.

could not detect the world's most wanted living near military academy,

Neither could any other for well over a decade.

could not stop the unilateral action of a foreign military and

Not the responsibility of an Int Agency.

cant stop the regular attacks. now that sounds like a #1 agency.:lol:

Neither can the CIA Afghan station.

With so many factual errors, I doubt you even know the roles and responsibilities of an Int Agency. Kindly do yourself a favour and use the world's most powerful tool of learning, i.e Internet, to your advantage so you look less ignorant.
 

Crime News NY in 2011 put ISI on Number one following CIA No2 and Raw on 8th. Now keep crying like babies that it's also a story by some pakistani media.
 
They were stealth helicopters, a previously unknown technology. How do you expect that there would be a deterrent for something that technically doesn't exist as yet? This pretty much equates to asking the Germans in the trenches of WWI why they performed so poorly against British Armour at the Somme when it was introduced for the first time.
LOL! please dont compare 1914 WW1 with 2014. Also still you haven't answer my question fully
How CIA know about osama's hideout when your mighty ISI have no clue about that? Please don't come by silly logic like you made before. Also why do America don't seek the help from the worlds "number 1 agency" ISI to catch osama from their own country?
 
LOL! please dont compare 1914 WW1 with 2014.

It's not a comparison, its an analogy. Learn the difference.

How CIA know about osama's hideout when your mighty ISI have no clue about that?

Must I repeat the fake vaccination drive story again?

Please don't come by silly logic like you made before.

Whatever you say chief.

Also why do America don't seek the help from the worlds "number 1 agency" ISI to catch osama from their own country?

1. I don't buy the whole "ISI is Number 1" narrative.

2. Because no agency worth their salt simply hands intelligence to someone else.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom