Ich
SENIOR MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/Major.jpg)
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2018
- Messages
- 2,541
- Reaction score
- -26
- Country
- Location
Yes, same were also my thoughts while reading this...this..."Dreingabe" (sorry, dont find an englisch word for it)I`d say the writer is still evidently fixated on the old ww2/cold war air power heavy doctrine and imagines for some strange reason that the us would attempt to employ some sort of desert storm/iraqi freedom style "shock and awe" air power campaign scenario against iran which would revolve entirely around air battles,as though irans missile forces and their recently demonstrated capabilities didnt even exist or would just sit back and allow them to do this without firing a single shot at the bases that any us air campaign would quite literally depend upon to have any hope of viability never mind actual success.Indeed rather strangely the only reference he makes to irans missile forces is that diego garcia is beyond their reach![LOL!].Personally I think that the absence of any reference to iranian missile power is actually pretty telling on his part.I did have to chuckle tho at his assertion that "Whatever success local industry might have achieved, keeping the legendary Tomcat flyable in any meaningful combat sense with no assistance from the OEM is probably impossible."....Yeah!...,sure buddy!.Whatever you say.....
To be honest my first thought when I started reading this was that it was some old article written way waaay back in the very early 2000s,so you can imagine my surprise when I realised that this was only written a little over a week ago,bizarre.....
![]()
Because both EU and the US are ultimately on the same boat when it comes to Iran. Just a game of good cop bad copt at the moment.
Better words would be "bad gangster worse gangster"