SOHEIL
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2011
- Messages
- 15,796
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
My question was meant to ask if the range-testing has been done or not.
obviously ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My question was meant to ask if the range-testing has been done or not.
My question was meant to ask if the range-testing has been done or not.
Your picture that I used as quote as reference.Who !?
Firing a missile doesn't mean it is put under a range-testing.Didn't you see the video of it?
so can you give me a link what improvements Iranians made to this missile...or which generation is sumar
thanks
Your picture that I used as quote as reference.
Firing a missile doesn't mean it is put under a range-testing.
I might just be to 'record' it flying.
Firing a missile doesn't mean it is put under a range-testing.
It might just be to 'record' it flying.
Iran made a Kh-55 clone. Thats fact. There is no any reason to suggest that Iranian clone is better than original. Just like there is no any reason to suggest that Iranian Kornet copy is better than Russian Kornet, for example. If u think its better than its clone u should prove it.The burden of proof is on the one making the statements not the one denying due to the statements being weak troll attempts.
The facts stand that you know nothing about this missiles guidance, and the fact that you think it uses the same guidance with same CEP as the old kh-55 shows your level of intellect.
Iran made a Kh-55 clone. Thats fact. There is no any reason to suggest that Iranian clone is better than original. Just like there is no any reason to suggest that Iranian Kornet copy is better than Russian Kornet, for example. If u think its better than its clone u should prove it.
Remember that Iran is still struggling to make S-300 copy - a Soviet missile from same era as Kh-55.
You just built a huge fake 'expensive' AC and destroyed it with 'expensive' missiles, just to seem like badass towards Israel and US, whereas it was well known that it would have no impact other than having them laugh at that effort of yours.Then you don't know how these things work. It is not a firecracker that you set it on fire. It is expensive and every firing must result in full data for analysis.
Awesome wait wait wait so funy bro.wait ...
Your picture that I used as quote as reference.
You just built a huge fake expensive AC and destroyed it with 'expensive' missiles, just to seem like badass towards Israel and US, whereas it was well known that it would have no impact other than having them laugh at that effort of yours.
So please don't talk about 'expensiveness'..
I think it would be smarter for you guys to cool it down right now.
Iran made a Kh-55 clone. Thats fact. There is no any reason to suggest that Iranian clone is better than original. Just like there is no any reason to suggest that Iranian Kornet copy is better than Russian Kornet, for example. If u think its better than its clone u should prove it.
Remember that Iran is still struggling to make S-300 copy - a Soviet missile from same era as Kh-55.