Screambowl
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2010
- Messages
- 8,167
- Reaction score
- -39
- Country
- Location
Who said they are RAW?
what is the use of this thread. 47-today. Blaming RAW and etc.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who said they are RAW?
what is the use of this thread. 47-today. Blaming RAW and etc.
Well what can I say. I don't see India messing up in your affairs.I would not do finger pointing, but suffice it to say that the result of interference will always be bad in the long term. USA did it in South America for many decades and the result is a virulent form of anti-Americanism there.
Well what can I say. I don't see India messing up in your affairs.
Sorry if it bothers you, but we need to monitor, record and study foreign intelligence activity in our land mass.
Not really. Best thing about RAW is that no one know more about it, even Indians too, And they have delivered astonishing results. Its because of few PM of India that resulted in few failures.At least somebody is giving some credit to RAW, in India they are usually abused for failures.. (most even dont know such an agency exists)
Well, I agree with you. Do you think India wouldn't have influence after your Independence ?Lets agree to disagree on that point.
It is like out of 10 Intelligence agencies of different countries, you pin pointed only RAW.
Well, I agree with you. Do you think India wouldn't have influence after your Independence ?
And more you got close to China, more things India will try. I know its bad, but its their job.
Having said that, RAW's major work was not to let Pakistan's ISI and LeT like terrorist groups to cause trouble in our NE states.
We have to protect and keep NE at any cost.
The two country that has direct stake in Bangladesh are India and Burma. With Burma we have a small border and almost no trade relation or shared river.
India obviously is a whole other ball game.
The rest of the world's interest in Bangladesh do not come anything close to India, hence everything points to the direction of RAW, as it matches with circumstantial evidence on the ground and published in various books and articles.
That's what RAW do. When ISI supported Khalistan, RAW created Sindhudesh movement, both then agreed not to interfere in those region.This was due to ISI activity back during East Pakistan time. BNP looked the other way on ULFA.
I think you have a belief that other than AL, which is under your control, everyone else like BNP-Jamat 14 party alliance will do mischief in NE states.
BNP-Jamat 14 alliance need to come clean on this issue and drop their support for NE insurgents and you guys need to drop your support for AL and any internal interference in Bangladesh. That is the best way forward.
What is the name of external intelligence agency of bd? they must be very secretive...
What is the name of external intelligence agency of bd? they must be very secretive...
That's what RAW do. When ISI supported Khalistan, RAW created Sindhudesh movement, both then agreed not to interfere in those region.
RAW has to create Quid Pro Quo. Otherwise helping ISI, LeT or ULFA, will make things bad for BD and may be for India too.
As you said, there is no other way.