Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
we could have got the Dassault Rafale from France long time ago but no we didn't because it was not soo called battle proven ...more like the commission was not enough for someone in the armed forces ...the thing which surprises me is a lot of current and retired armed forces people on this forum know a lot of corrupt people in the armed forces but wont name and shame them with pictures .... question is why tho are they not loyal to PAKISTAN ...if we can call out politicians corrupt why not the people in armed forces as well ...
We couldn’t afford the Rafale. Breathe and calm down.we could have got the Dassault Rafale from France long time ago but no we didn't because it was not soo called battle proven ...more like the commission was not enough for someone in the armed forces ...the thing which surprises me is a lot of current and retired armed forces people on this forum know a lot of corrupt people in the armed forces but wont name and shame them with pictures .... question is why tho are they not loyal to PAKISTAN ...if we can call out politicians corrupt why not the people in armed forces as well ...
We couldn’t afford the Rafale. Breathe and calm do
like always we cant afford anything but can afford to build new HQ IN ISLAMABAD
I think we've both seen weird conceit from the PAF, but this idea that they'd walk away from a good fighter when the money's available is strange. Folks are underestimating the massive economic hit Pakistan took with the earthquake, Zardari, peak COIN/CT, and loss of US aid -- all in rapid succession circa 2004-2014.We couldn’t afford the Rafale. Breathe and calm down.
I think we've both seen weird conceit from the PAF, but this idea that they'd walk away from a good fighter when the money's available is strange. Folks are underestimating the massive economic hit Pakistan took with the earthquake, Zardari, peak COIN/CT, and loss of US aid -- all in rapid succession circa 2004-2014.
we could have got the Dassault Rafale from France long time ago but no we didn't because it was not soo called battle proven ...more like the commission was not enough for someone in the armed forces ...the thing which surprises me is a lot of current and retired armed forces people on this forum know a lot of corrupt people in the armed forces but wont name and shame them with pictures .... question is why tho are they not loyal to PAKISTAN ...if we can call out politicians corrupt why not the people in armed forces as well ...
they are rebuilt using parts from better mirages..we gathered more than 150..so i am pretty sure that they will last till 2030It's a given that the airframe life is limited on the existing Mirages in service, despite the avionics and weapons upgrades.
I'm guessing the aircraft get about 150 hours a year?
So how many years of service are theoretically left?
Not many I would assume.
Although the ex-Libyan, etc. examples were probably low airframe hours.
Still I would assume maybe another decade of use at max?
Of course the ROSE are the last ones to go.
I think we've both seen weird conceit from the PAF, but this idea that they'd walk away from a good fighter when the money's available is strange. Folks are underestimating the massive economic hit Pakistan took with the earthquake, Zardari, peak COIN/CT, and loss of US aid -- all in rapid succession circa 2004-2014.
in other words PAF doesnt has money for thunders let alone a new fighter..JH-7 is thoroughly tested by both PAF & PN and they prefer to keep Mirages over it till better option is available as J-11 was not available which PN and PAF wanted to replace Mirages with maritime role.
Until and unless some big changes comes in new JH-7 model on par with latest J1x series PN and PAF will not consider it, it will be sitting duck against Indian air defences.
Indra is good and Italy is offering latest stuff and they also ready to provide very advance hard points inbuilt EW system allowing JFT to carry same weapons capacity with very robust EW capabilities which will give it capability to challenge enemy air defences even without any support asset that currently China can not provide.
If PAF had money they would have gone for best EW suit and radar from west for JFT, we might have end up with Raven-05 class AESA with MICA-IR/ASRAAM/IRIS-T with Meteor/MICA type configuration.
in other words PAF doesnt has money for thunders let alone a new fighter..
every one says the same thing here about issues with finances problem is the armed forces should not have spent money on changing uniforms 1st they should have got better equipment ..wars are won by providing the right equipment at the right time ... now crying like a little girl about money issues wont change anything ...and in order to buy something which will make your country defense more stronger the you need loyal people not MR GENERAL the commission agent .....
what about J-10C?Even in that case JH7A dont fill the bill. J10A cant face rafael. So your logic is still flawed
Hi,
Your discussing it means nothing---. You have no tactical background and understanding of the systems---. And many of those on the other side are not the brightest either---.
There is something called---need---utility---necessity---.
The need & utility supercedes everything else---with necessity and need running close by in parallel.
For a low skimmer over the waves---rcs is the least of the concerns---. And just because the aircraft can be loaded to 9000 KG does not mean that would be the operational requirement for the naval strike missions or precision strike missions---.
The J11 is running around 60 million a piece---. The current JH7A's can be had for maybe between 1 million to 5 million dollars---.
You can have 2 sqdrns of JH7A's for the price of 2 J11's and for the price of 3 1/2 J11's you can get spare engines and other spare parts as well---at max.
A nation that drives and lives by a SUZUKI MEHRAN or a 75cc Honda motorcycle---that nation cannot claim to pick and chose---.
This is the same air force that picked the A5 Fantan---the worst of the worst---. Why---because of its 175 miles flt radius---can't put itself in real harms way---.
Why the air force rejects the JH7A---. The Paf has claimed that it is a defensive air force---with the JH7A it will have to fly farther---see---with the A5's or the mirage 3 / 5 they can stay close by and don't risk themselves---.