Seyfullah
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2013
- Messages
- 1,702
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
photos might be but deployment is true.pics from 2016..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
photos might be but deployment is true.pics from 2016..
photos might be but deployment is true.
Why do you think I should share that info with you?From which source is it true, twitter sphere?
Why do you think I should share that info with you?
Feel free not to believe, your choice at the end of the day.
Yes regime needs troops at Hama.Tadef under ES control. Very interesting...
Just add me to your ignore list and live your life happily without BS I post.Oh you don't have to, but dont get annoyed if I call out the BS you post by claiming its true - when the evidence they post is a year old.
Just add me to your ignore list and live your life happily without BS I post.
I'm quite happy to expose BS.
156.The Turkish forces have, in part through the direct participation in the fighting of its armed forces and in part by supporting anti-regime Syrian militias, created and held an enclave of territory in northern Syria. They have done so in part to create what they call a ‘terror-free zone’ in which refugees can live safely, in part to confront ISIL, and in part to confront the Kurdish YPG militia, which Turkey says is tied to the PKK terrorist group. Turkey’s policies in northern Syria pose important questions for the UK, and the FCO should:
a)Explain whether the UK supports the creation of a safe-zone by Turkish forces and their allies in northern Syria, and provide an assessment of the implications that the creation of such a zone carries for Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and any peace process, as well as for the safety and security of those within such a zone.
b)Explain whether the UK supports the settlement of Syrian refugees within territory controlled by Turkish-backed Syrian opposition groups in Syria.
c)Explain whether it shares our assessment that the YPG, rather than ISIL, are now the primary target of Turkey’s Operation Euphrates Shield.
d)Explain whether it agrees with Turkey’s assertion that the YPG are linked with the PKK to such an extent that they should share the latter’s designation as terrorists. This is of immediate importance, given that the YPG are the predominant Kurdish group in northern Syria, have significantly expanded their territory there, and are the main component of the SDF coalition which both the UK and US support against ISIL.
157.Conflict between the YPG and Turkey is not in the interest of the UK or the wider international community, and the FCO must explain how it is going to work to end the fighting between two forces that have been the primary armies fighting ISIL on the ground in Syria.
158.We recommend a determined effort by the FCO to persuade Turkey to recommence the peace process with the PKK. This should include support for Turkish recognition and enablement of Kurdish cultural identity, and discussion of sustainable local autonomy as the basis for the wider reconciliation of Turkish, Kurdish, and international interests.
https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmfaff/615/61509.htm
they want another peace process and autonomy for kurds. Those are the same ones with whom we are building tfx with