kalu_miah
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2009
- Messages
- 6,475
- Reaction score
- 17
- Country
- Location
Will Turkey be satisfied if the US strategy is containment, since the whole world criticizes us when we intervene (as you have done)? If the US experience has revealed one thing, it is that the Muslim world will never tolerate the interference of a Muslim power. The question is, whose dominion does the US end up supporting: Turkey, Saudi Arabia, or Obama's new friend, Iran?
I invite anyone who expects US boots on the ground to read the US press and look at US polls. In the near term, the US is likely to contribute no more than air strikes and potentially weapons and funds, but the real fighting will have to be done by someone else. We're exhausted.
I will let Turks answer the question about what will satisfy them.
Once the West have intervened and taken ownership (since the breakup of Ottoman), my view is that it has become a region the West must take responsibility for. So intervention has not become an option, rather an obligation, since that point:
If You Break It, You Own It | George Mitrovich
What I pointed out is that the nature of intervention were wrong headed and produced terrible instability and chaos, mainly the use of extremist ideologies as geopolitical tools.
I never implied in the previous post that their should be US boots on the ground. It is obvious the US public are fine with bombing from the air, but not boots on the ground.
So this bring us to the question where boots on the ground will come from then, to defeat IS, while the West and GCC are providing air support. I will let forum members debate this basic question.
My personal opinion is that there are 1.7 billion Muslims in the world, perhaps it will help to bring large countries of the Muslim world to pitch in with man power and the oil rich countries to pitch in with financing. This will also help unite the Muslim world and make them feel good about solving their own problems with their own effort. The West and GCC has enough leverage with many of these populous Muslim countries to persuade them to take part, if some of them are reluctant to get involved. And then in the long term, the issue of extremist financing source from US allied countries in the region must be addressed. Ideologies cannot be killed with bullets, it can only be defeated with a competing and better ideology and wiping out the financing source of the target ideology.