What's new

The Islamic Conquest of India Prophecy (Ghazwa-e-Hind)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Globally, as shown in a previous post.
Globally yes. In total.
But in India for instance conversions are minuscule. Then there are murtads like Kalam.
But our fertility is much higher. Also in muslim dominated areas conversion rates increase because local minority seeks safety in numbers. All is His mercy.
 
We had a few cases of violence against Muslims by other zealots but the overwhelming majority of them live normal lives.

It's not just a few cases, your country oppresses Muslims in Kashmir, you treat Bangladeshi Muslim migrants like dirt, Muslims regularly get attacked for simple things like eating beef, Muslims are under-represented politically, religious Muslims like Zakir Naik are labelled as criminals for no valid reason whatsoever, you demand Muslims denounce any and all things we have done throughout South Asian history, etc.
 
It's not just a few cases, your country oppresses Muslims in Kashmir, you treat Bangladeshi Muslim migrants like dirt, Muslims regularly get attacked for simple things like eating beef, Muslims are under-represented politically, religious Muslims like Zakir Naik are labelled as criminals for no valid reason whatsoever, you demand Muslims denounce any and all things we have done throughout South Asian history, etc.
Kashmir is not about Islam or religion. It's unfinished business. That's why no other Muslim country will touch it.

Muslim migrants are treated as any other migrants. Illegal migrants will be treated differently by the law and institutions.

Eating beef is illegal in certain states and violators will be prosecuted by the law. It's perfectly fine to eat beef in those states where it is legal.

Anybody working against country or population will be dealt with. It's the same in any country, even yours.

What exactly are asking anybody to denounce?
 
Yeah but also because of conversions, again, as stated and proven prior.
Negligible in number. The conversion to Islam is very very low. Like 20k people in 4 years taking the average. And a significant number of people leave Islam.
 
Kashmir is not about Islam or religion. It's unfinished business. That's why no other Muslim country will touch it.

Muslim migrants are treated as any other migrants. Illegal migrants will be treated differently by the law and institutions.

Eating beef is illegal in certain states and violators will be prosecuted by the law. It's perfectly fine to eat beef in those states where it is legal.

Anybody working against country or population will be dealt with. It's the same in any country, even yours.

What exactly are asking anybody to denounce?

Irrelevant, Muslims are still being treated poorly.

I beg to differ, the hatred seems to be intensified towards the Bengali migrants because they're Muslim. I don't see you guys ever give the same treatment towards Hindu migrants from Pakistan.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.a1170c239c10

No it's not, people will kill you for it and if they won't, the police will coerce you as another thread that is currently pretty active on the forum is demonstrating.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...-vigilantes-kill-muslim-man-transporting-cows

Zakir Naik literally did nothing wrong.

Same old stuff, e.g you can't like Aurangzeb Alamgir, you can't like Muhammad Bin Qasim, you can't like Mahmud Ghaznavi, etc.
 
Negligible in number. The conversion to Islam is very very low. Like 20k people in 4 years taking the average. And a significant number of people leave Islam.

It's not negligible, we have a higher positive net growth due to conversions than any other religious community (this includes people leaving the religion, hence why it's called net growth).
 
It's not negligible, we have a higher positive net growth due to conversions than any other religious community (this includes people leaving the religion, hence why it's called net growth).
I can only speak for India. Given the topic is Gazwa e Hind.
 
It is His will to see the Islam is spread to every nook and cranny of this world. It is as much of an aggression as that of light is to darkness.
I think I speak for all Indians when I graciously decline. We like to keep things pretty informal and open minded here.
 
No body invaded muslim countries. Since the early days of Islam muslims have shown aggression against people of other faiths. The Rashidun Calips who were considered as the caliphs of a pure Islamic state killed and persecuted Zoroastrians after they conquered Persia. Millions of Zoroastrians fled to India where they were given refuge. They are now known as Parsis. Muslims have been savages since its founding.


Not really because Sassanids were even at odds with the Aryan tribes of India.

The previously autonomous Kushans were obliged to accept his suzerainty. Although the Kushan empire declined at the end of the 3rd century, to be replaced by the northern Indian Gupta Empire in the 4th century, it is clear that Sasanian influence remained relevant in India's northwest throughout this period.

The Sassanid Empire in 610.

10418.png


Iran_Under_Sasanian.gif


To the east its nearest neighbors were the Kushan Empire of Sasanian territory

In the south in central Arabia, Arab tribes occasionally raided the Sasanian empire. The Kingdom of Al-Hirah, a Sasanian vassal kingdom, was established to form a buffer zone between the empire's mainland and the Arab tribes. The dissolution of the Kingdom of Al-Hirah by Khosrow II in 602 contributed greatly to decisive Sasanian defeats suffered against Arabs later in the century. These defeats resulted in a sudden takeover of the Sasanian empire by Bedouin tribes under the Islamic banner.

Al-Nu'mān III ibn al-Mundhir also transcribed Na'aman, Nu'aman and Noman and often known by the name Abu Qabus was the last Lakhmid king of Al-Hirah (582 – ca. 602 AD) and a Nestorian Christian Arab.

In 602, Khosrow II Parvēz imprisoned the Lakhmid king Numan III and abolished the dynasty, appointing Iyas ibn Qabisah al-Ta'i, an Arab of the tribe of Tayy, as governor.

Dhi Qar, watering place near Kufa in Sasanian Empire (modern Iraq) was a battle ground that was fought between Arab tribesmen and Persian forces in the early 7th century.

'No matter what you do to the Muslims in Burma, it will forever pale in comparison to the beatings we have handed you throughout history'

In 1989, the ruling military government changed the name from Burma to Myanmar after thousands were killed in an uprising. The city of Rangoon also became Yangon. Many names across the country changed: Maymyo became Pyin Oo Lwin, Ayeyarwady became Irrawaddy, Moulmein became Mawlamyine.

The term Burma is derived from the Kshatriya title Varma or Barma, also known as Brahmmadesh.

Burma was known as Indra-Dvipa. Hindu settlements began to be established in Burma before the first century A.D.

It is contended that this relationship can be traced back to the time of the Buddha. Hindu settlements were set up in Arakan, Tagaung, Srikshetra, Thaton and Pegu at a very early period. Literary and archaeological evidence shows that the entire culture and civilization of Burma was borrowed from India and not from China. Ptolemy, the geographer, tells us that in the 2nd century A.D. many places in Burma had Sanskrit names. Indian religions flourished in Burma. Many religious structures having the images of Indian gods and goddesses have also been found from Burma.

The Pali literature of Burma on law is based on the Dharamsastras of Manu, Narada and Yajnavalkya. The art of Burma was also influenced by the Indian art.

In Burma, the finest temple is the Ananda at Pagan. It occupies the center of a spacious courtyard which is 564 ft square. There is no doubt of its derivation from Indian type. Temples of the same type existed in Bengal and most probably suggested the model of the Ananda temple.

" There can be no doubt that the architects who planned and built the Ananda temple were Indians. Everything in this temple from Sikhara to the basement as well as the numerous stone sculptures found in its corridors and the terra-cotta...adoring its basement and terraces, bear the indubitable stamp of Indian genius and craftsmanship...In this sense, we may take it, therefore, that the Ananda, though built in the Burmese capital, is an Indian temple."


Malaya or Sri Vijaya

The greatest of the states was the Sailendra Empire, or the empire of Shri Vijaya, which became the dominant power both on sea and land in the whole of Malaysia by the eighth century. The empire was also a sea Power based on trade. Hence you find that it had ports wherever it could get the smallest footing. Indeed a remarkable feature of the settlements of the Sumatrian State was their strategic value - that is to say, they were carefully located at places where they could command the surrounding seas. Often they were in pairs to help each other in maintaining this command. Thus, Singapore, which is a great city now, was originally a settlement of the Sumatran colonists. The name, as you will notice, is a typical Indian name: Singhpur. The Sumatran people had another settlement just opposite the Straits, facing Singhpur. Sometimes they would stretch an iron chain right across the Strait and so stop all ships from passing till they paid heavy tolls.

Indic_influence_SEAsia_map.jpg


So why do you say that we Buddhists are terrorists for killing muslims in Burma when you guys persecuted millions of Buddhists in Pakistan, Afghanistan and China? Who are the real terrorists?

Sardar Kavalam Madhava Panikkar (1896-1963) Indian historian, in his book A Survey of Indian History
"From the first century A.D we witness the strange fact of Hindu or Hinduised kingdoms in Annam , Cochin-China and the islands of the Pacific. The Ramayana knew of Java and Sumatra . Communication by sea between the ports of South India and the islands of the Pacific was well established many centuries before the Christian era."

(source: A Survey of Indian History - By Sardar Kavalam Madhava Panikkar p. 68 - 69).


In a special article in The Hindu on 4 January 1946, Sukarno wrote:

"In the veins of every one of my people flows the blood of Indian ancestors and the culture that we possess is steeped through and through with Indian influences. Two thousand years ago people from your country came to Jawadvipa and Suvarnadvipa in the spirit of brotherly love.

"They gave the initiative to found powerful kingdoms such as those of Sri Vijaya, Mataram and Majapahit. We then learnt to worship the very Gods that you now worship still and we fashioned a culture that even today is largely identical with your own. Later, we turned to Islam: but that religion too was brought by people coming from both sides of India."

According to Indian historian, Dr. K. P. Jayaswal, "Further India was recognized as part of India in the Bharasiva-Vakataka period. In the Matsya Purana, for the first time we find that recognition. Between the Himavat and the Sea Bharatvarsha stands, but it covers a larger area on account of Indians living in eight more islands (Dvipas). All these Dvipas were to the east. The Malaya Peninsula was well-known to Indians at the time, a fact evidenced by an inscription of the 4th century A.D. on a pillar in the present district of Wellesley. Burma was known as Indradvipa. Ceylon was known as Lanka-Dvipa or Tamraparni. Similarly, Cambodia, Nicobar, Sumatra, Java and Borneo were also known."

Kambhoja, which was a well-known town in ancient India, as was Gandhara in (present day Afghanistan).

“From the Brahmaputra and Manipur to the Tonkin Gulf we can trace a continuous string of petty states ruled by those scions of the Kshatriya race, using the Sanskrit or the Pali language in official documents and inscriptions, building temples and other monuments of the Hindu style and employing Brahmin priest at the propitiatory ceremonies connected with the court and the state.”


According to historian Dr. K. P. Jayaswal, "The State of Champa, according the Chinese authorities was founded in 137 A. D.

Champa seems to have been mentioned under the name Angadvipa by the Vayu Purana.

Again, Champa was probably the earliest colony, it being a key to the Chinese trade and the point from the islands of Java and Borneo are easily accessible." It maintained close relations with Funan, a fact which must have been largely responsible for the penetration of Indian influence there.

A Hindu dynasty was founded by Sri Mara in the second century A.D. A successor to Sri Mara was the famous king called Bhadravarma. He ruled over the Northern and Central portions of the kingdom comprising the provinces of Amravati and Vijaya and possibly also the Southern province of Panduranga. His greatest contribution was to Hindu culture was the building of the temple of Bhadresvarasvamin (Shiva) at Myson which became the national shrine of the Chams.

It is said that Bhadravarman abdicated his throne to spend his last days on the banks of the river Ganges. This was followed by two dynasties - the Panduranga dynasty (757-860) and later by the Bhrigu dynasty (860-985).

Champa passed through various dynasties and war with China continued in the 3rd and 4th century. This was a period of political unrest in China, and which gave Champa the opportunity to expand into Chinese territory. Shiva and Vishnu were worshipped by various names. Goddess Laxmi was known as Padma or Sri.

As regards to literature, Sanskrit was the language of the learned. It was also the official language of the country. Many kings of Champa were Sanskrit scholars. Brahmi script was used in inscriptions.

Borneo or Varunadvipa

The earliest evidence of Hindu colonies of Borneo is furnished by inscriptions which have been referred on paleographic grounds to about 400 A.D. These inscriptions refer to king Mula-varman, son of Asva-varman and grandson of king Kundunga. Mula-varman performed a sacrifice known as Vahusu-varmakam and gave 20,000 cows to the Brahmins. A number of Hindu and Buddhist images have been found in Kombeng.



Champa_Panduranga.jpg
 
No, I wasn't (although that's part of it). I was going to bring up stuff like this:


Sahih Bukhari Volume 009, Book 088, Hadith Number 232.
Narrated By Abu Huraira : Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established till the buttocks of the women of the tribe of Daus move while going round Dhi-al-Khalasa." Dhi-al-Khalasa was the idol of the Daus tribe which they used to worship in the Pre Islamic Period of ignorance.

The Khalash people are undoubtedly Dardic people, these pagan people have claimed to be the long-lost descendants of Alexander, they believe in many gods and more specifically in the twelve gods of ancient Greece including Zeus, Apollo and Aphrodite.
 
Al Albani was from Albania you idiot, he's European and classified the hadith as sahih as shown earlier.

People said the same thing about the Muslims defeating the Byzantines or the Persians, but look what happened there.

Well, we do have higher fertility rates and attract far more converts than Hindusim, as shown before.

Clearly you haven't.

Alberuni was fluent in Arabic, Farsi, and Sanskrit.

Alberuni, an astronomer-mathematician of Khiva, north of Afghanistan, was brought to Ghazni in 1017 as a prisoner of war.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom