What's new

The Islamic Conquest of India Prophecy (Ghazwa-e-Hind)

Status
Not open for further replies.
. .
Why didn't he just reveal the Quran first? I don't know, but it doesn't really matter.

You dont know too many things but still has audacity to claim your religion as only true and other's fake.

It does matter. God is not a fool to reveal the real truth after millions of year of humanity. And thats too not call it an extension to already revealed truths but the only and last one.
 
.
It's like it is, a Hadees for South Asians. Even you can ask Turkish friends in the forum if they ever heard of this Prophecy.
I didn't say the Hadith is vague, what I said is, you guys are not clear if it already happened or yet to happen. Because if it never happens, you can claim it already happened and if it actually happens you can have 'I told you so' moment. Predictable

Yeah, I figured, because that's where it diverges. When it comes to scientific temper.

Oh, they are. Because the all-knowing god failed to mention about this creature who pretty much dominated the earth. It was discovered by scientists/archeologists, not by religious hotheads. The religious hotheads claim these inventions as god sent or an xyz prophesy that's already there.

How is it a hadith for South Asians if you have Arab and European scholars acknowledging it's authenticity?

Regardless as to whether or not the hadith is referring to our previous conquests over Hindustan, we will still defeat you in battle when the Mahdi comes near Yawm Al Qiyamah if you do not cease your crimes against the Muslims before that.

Why would Allah Azza Wa Jal mention such creatures when they are almost completely irrelevant to the religion? You guys are so silly.
 
.
You dont know too many things but still has audacity to claim your religion as only true and other's fake.

It does matter. God is not a fool to reveal the real truth after millions of year of humanity. And thats too not call it an extension to already revealed truths but the only and last one.

I know enough to know its the truth, these details such as "why God did this and not xyz" are meaningless.

No it doesn't, and as said before, Allah Azza Wa Jal gave previous scripture to humanity, even the first people Adam (Peace Be Upon Him) and Hawwa (May Allah Be Pleased With Her) were given religious guidance.

Also, humanity is only a few hundred thousand years old, not millions.
 
.
I know enough to know its the truth, these details such as "why God did this and not xyz" are meaningless.

No it doesn't, and as said before, Allah Azza Wa Jal gave previous scripture to humanity, even the first people Adam (Peace Be Upon Him) and Hawwa (May Allah Be Pleased With Her) were given religious guidance.

Also, humanity is only a few hundred thousand years old, not millions.

Must have given quran to them and told Hawwa to wear burkha so that she dont land in hell.

Why not God reveal the real truth to those poor souls? Why only to arabs? And then let them to invade countries to spread it?
 
.
Must have given quran to them and told Hawwa to wear burkha so that she dont land in hell.

Why not God reveal the real truth to those poor souls? Why only to arabs? And then let them to invade countries to spread it?

Rules varied depending on the region as well as the time, only the core message has always been consistent.

I already told you, he did.

As for why he revealed the Quran in particular to the Arabs, it was simply because he willed it. We could ponder over the wisdom of it (e.g the beauty of the Arabic language, the fact that the Arabs from the Hejaz are descended from some of the most important of Prophets like Ibrahim Peace Be Upon Him, etc), but again, it's ultimately irrelevant.

It's also worth noting that some of the Sahabah were non-Arab, e.g Salman Al Farsi, Bilal Ibn Rabah, Suhayb Ar Rumi, etc (May Allah Be Pleased With Them).
 
.
Rules varied depending on the region as well as the time, only the core message has always been consistent.

I already told you, he did.

As for why he revealed the Quran in particular to the Arabs, it was simply because he willed it. We could ponder over the wisdom of it (e.g the beauty of the Arabic language, the fact that the Arabs from the Hejaz are descended from some of the most important of Prophets like Ibrahim Peace Be Upon Him, etc), but again, it's ultimately irrelevant.

It's also worth noting that some of the Sahabah were non-Arab, e.g Salman Al Farsi, Bilal Ibn Rabah, Suhayb Ar Rumi, etc (May Allah Be Pleased With Them).

Every genuine question is irrelevant for you.

So if rules varied as per the region, why bother to follow those rules made for arabs?

You are lost, an adamant lost.
 
.
Every genuine question is irrelevant for you.

So if rules varied as per the region, why bother to follow those rules made for arabs?

You are lost, an adamant lost.

Your questions are not genuine, they are idiotic and have been answered by many before me.

Because this time Allah Azza Wa Jal said these ones are permanent and for all people.

You are an idiot, and a rather stubborn one at that, but I'm not surprised considering where you come from.
 
.
Your questions are not genuine, they are idiotic and have been answered by many before me.

Because this time Allah Azza Wa Jal said these ones are permanent and for all people.

You are an idiot, and a rather stubborn one at that, but I'm not surprised considering where you come from.

I can understand your anger and abuse now. Quite common with your kind of people.

Its just that internet restrict you to go beyond abuse.

So are rules made for regions as you said earlier?
 
.
I can understand your anger and abuse now. Quite common with your kind of people.

Its just that internet restrict you to go beyond abuse.

So are rules made for regions as you said earlier?

When you act stupid you will be treated as if you are stupid.

They were, but as I've stated before, that's no longer the case since the Quran was revealed. Learn to read my posts before barking, because repeating myself is rather tedious.
 
.
It's like it is, a Hadees for South Asians.
Again I see most stupid elementary mistake being made on which a whole industry has proliferated. At heart of this is translation. How was translation of the original in Arabic done? Was it accurate and time sensitive?

Ghazwa-e-Hind. What was the meaning of 'Hind' in 8-9th centuries? Not 2018. I read a article which went into detail that in 8-9th centuries 'Hind' was term associated with the Indus valley and more specifically the lower Indus Basin. Meaning 'Hind' meant modern day Sindh. Therefore Ghazwa-e-Hind already took place 1,000 years ago when Arabs invaded 'Hind' [Sindh]. However such intricacies are just inconvenience to those boneheads who today read old Arabic and then transliterate eveything by using the context of 2018.
 
.
When you act stupid you will be treated as if you are stupid.

They were, but as I've stated before, that's no longer the case since the Quran was revealed. Learn to read my posts before barking, because repeating myself is rather tedious.

You gave up so easily, I hadn't even started.

There were many "I dont know" about to come, but alas!!
 
. . .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom