PAF J-10C News, Updates and Discussion

[Trango Towers]

Can you confirm if this is true? @Deino

Bro apply some common sense

 

[Ali_Baba]

not correct, all 6 underwing pylon and centerline are wired for various payload and ammo. two air intake pylon are wired for many various pods and not too bulky weapons. the rear fuselage pylon could be used for various weapons load, there is nothing stopping to use them for weapons fit the size and weight.

really, how would you know, any link to support ?

 

[Deino]

Can you confirm if this is true? @Deino

No, he is wrong and @serenity is correct. Actually I don’t why he is still posting these lies again and again

 

[MastanKhan]

Can you confirm if this is true? @Deino

Hi,

So you are trying to determine who has a sure fire inside information.

 

[Sinnerman108]

View attachment 886910

View attachment 886911

that is a toy !

 

[mdmm]

Kindly confirm that Pakistan is getting 64 J-10 C from China,.
Here are different sources telling different numbers of 5th Genration J-10 C .

Pak Air Force will buy 60 latest J-10 CP from China

ISLAMABAD (92 News) – First J-10 CP will reach to the country in March while within next few months second and third also will be handed over to Pakistan.

92newshd.tv

As per Pakistani media (92 News HD). Pakistan has extended its order of J-10C to 60 .
As per Pakistani media (92 News HD). Pakistan has extended its order of J-10C to 60 (As per other sources 64), initially Pakistan ordered 36x J-10C fighter jets from China.
During recent (2022) visit to USA, Honorable Gen. Qamar Bajwa requested to USA authority to sell latest F-16 to Pakistan ,but USA refused strictly.
So J-10 C is the only option for Pakistan Army to buy ,even more than 60 .

 

[Mrc]

Stand off dominance

 

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

The Game Changer

 

[SQ8]

No, he is wrong and @serenity is correct. Actually I don’t why he is still posting these lies again and again

Wishful thinking to want to overbloat the capabilities of what is still a decent system.

While nothing stops anyone from adding additional wiring(and weight) to it to potentially allow carriage of SDB class weapons the payoff is simply not there(yet) for it to be considered.

 

[RAMPAGE]

The Game Changer
View attachment 887622

So which did we get: PL15 or PL15E? @Deino

 

[TheSolution]

So which did we get: PL15 or PL15E? @Deino

Both apparently, but PL-15E is confirmed.

 

[PakFactor]

Kindly confirm that Pakistan is getting 64 J-10 C from China,.
Here are different sources telling different numbers of 5th Genration J-10 C .

Pak Air Force will buy 60 latest J-10 CP from China

ISLAMABAD (92 News) – First J-10 CP will reach to the country in March while within next few months second and third also will be handed over to Pakistan.

92newshd.tv

As per Pakistani media (92 News HD). Pakistan has extended its order of J-10C to 60 .
As per Pakistani media (92 News HD). Pakistan has extended its order of J-10C to 60 (As per other sources 64), initially Pakistan ordered 36x J-10C fighter jets from China.
During recent (2022) visit to USA, Honorable Gen. Qamar Bajwa requested to USA authority to sell latest F-16 to Pakistan ,but USA refused strictly.
So J-10 C is the only option for Pakistan Army to buy ,even more than 60 .

This is interesting news.

 

[SQ8]

So which did we get: PL15 or PL15E? @Deino

PL-15s in token numbers(no more than 50-60) shipped directly from PLA stock to fly with hybrid Blk-2 with AESA post Balakot.

PL-15E delivered with J-10C and to be integrated with Block-3s. Mixed signals on whether the range difference of export variant applies or not - but for all known and verified official sources and not hearsay - the PL-15E is 145km max NEZ range

 

[Abramar]

I don't know why people still believe that the PL-15 and PL-15E have different performance. Anyone who knows anything about missiles will know that range figures are useless.

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

I don't know why people still believe that the PL-15 and PL-15E have different performance. Anyone who knows anything about missiles will know that range figures are useless.

As long as PAF maintains the "asymmetric" advantage - 02/27 style - over IAF all is good for the time being....