We have already demonstrated that you do not understand the basics of aerodynamics given your claim of: "The UAV has small wings thus it cannot travel 2000km" which was debunked". Now you're making another similair false claim, this time on the issue of engine. Propeller UAVs can travel for days in some case, it is common place nowadays to have UAVS that travel for many hours. I have already demonstrated a similar size Iranian UAV that has a endurance of 12 hours and speed of 400km/h. Do the basic mathematics and figure out potential range.
As for why Israel has not done it, Israel relies on importing foreign engines, they also do have not any jet powered UAVs thus I guess it means Iran's jet powered UAVs must be phantoms. All this is basic logic.
This claim was aerodynamically illiterate and debunked in post 39 in this thread. The possibilities are as follow:
1- You cannot intellectually comprehend the aerodynamic facts that were presented you, hence why you could not reply to a single point of that post.
2- You're deliberately pretending to be ignorant of the science. In other words, your actions are tantamount to believing 2+2= 19 just to help protect the fantasies in your mind.
That's not how it works, if you want to be taken seriously, you need to use facts and science to back your assertion. You have done nothing of the sort so far minus some out of touch statements with nothing objective to back them.
Like I said to another member earlier, it's best not to get bogged down on semantics. If we wanted to get technical, then a cruise missiles is a form of unmanned aerial vehicle. If we wanted to draw a distinction between this Iranian UAV and classical cruise missiles, then we could focus on the fact one is using propeller systems vs jet engine. There are many grey areas in between.