Hakan
RETIRED INTL MOD
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2014
- Messages
- 6,274
- Reaction score
- 39
- Country
- Location
I wasn't clear my bad. In general the shorter range stuff, anti ship missiles etc.Never. Exporting long range missiles is internationally banned.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wasn't clear my bad. In general the shorter range stuff, anti ship missiles etc.Never. Exporting long range missiles is internationally banned.
I believe what I see ... you told me that the Qaher-313 and a real fighter, but I see still nothing.Oh yes
Farsnews
Oh you are so wrong here sis . Have you not heard of Ghaem? Any country that can make such a monster solid fuel space launch vehicle can easily, and I mean easily make an ICBM. Technically, ghaem itself could be used as an ICBM but it will not be a very practical one due to its size/lack of mobility.
5 years on from the implementation of the dealI wasn't clear my bad. In general the shorter range stuff, anti ship missiles etc.
I believe what I see ... you told me that the Qaher-313 and a real fighter, but I see still nothing.
But look at the warhead of this missile!! It does not look any known to me... Although it could be the angle of view that makes the warhead look very much like a gas capsule!!@scythian500
The missile in the Silo is a shahab missile. It was confirmed in a video years ago. The reporter actually asked the official if the missile was a shahab missile and the official said yes.
But look at the warhead of this missile!! It does not look any known to me... Although it could be the angle of view that makes the warhead look very much like a gas capsule!!
What is it? Is it photoshopped?
Time to move on to the solid-fueled stuff . The likes of sejil. It's not wise to share the money in two different programs. And liquid belongs to cold war era (Military usage i mean )It looks just like a shahab to me:
Time to move on to the solid-fueled stuff . The likes of sejil. It's not wise to share the money in two different programs. And liquid belongs to cold war era (Military usage i mean )
Liquid fueled Shahabs will play the role of bate... The main current ones to level up Haifa and Tel Aviv are Sejil-1 and 2 and Ghadr-H (rainy warheads) If I'm not wrong.. although, there definitely are new missiles in waiting list to replace with these...Time to move on to the solid-fueled stuff . The likes of sejil. It's not wise to share the money in two different programs. And liquid belongs to cold war era (Military usage i mean )
Yes it was a version of sejjil with a lighter warhead but someone said it failed to hit the target .Not enough accurate . Still sejjil is the best MRBM in Iran's arsenal .Full solid fuelled MRBM missiles like sejill will probably be used for anti-ship roles and other "special roles". Do you remember the new from a couple years ago that they tested an anti ship missile with range 3000km and speed of mach-13? That was most definitely a sejill derivative.
Yes it was a version of sejjil with a lighter warhead but someone said it failed to hit the target .Not enough accurate .
Time is not that much valuable in case of missiles. Not saying it is not important for the protection of the firing site. I mean, If Iran is under attack, Iran won't need to strike back in minutes... She can strike hours after strike... but as I said already, these liquid fueled missiles are in huge numbers and can be used for good purposes!wasting no time to fuel it..
I didn't mean sh!t bro. Just that it's not in service yet. Sejjil is great anyway . But for longer ranges we need a better solid fuel. I mean look at U.S solid ICBMs . They have the same size as sejjil but 13000 km range . Even agni 5.. DF 31 ... I guess the reason that the Qaem rocket has a 20 meters long first stage is that it use the same fuel as sejil.Where did you hear this bro? Even if it failed first launch, it's a matter time before it succeeds. Important thing is, they're working on such a bad boy
That's a great tactic but after this deal we need quality more than quantity cuz I don't see any threat in coming years. And to be honest i hate communist strategies. Soviet did the same. They had different types of ICBMs in cold war era but non was great and flexible. U.S had one type in service and that type is still in service.Time is not that much valuable in case of missiles. Not saying it is not important for the protection of the firing site. I mean, If Iran is under attack, Iran won't need to strike back in minutes... She can strike hours after strike... but as I said already, these liquid fueled missiles are in huge numbers and can be used for good purposes!
the problem is that we do not have time, we will not wait a year to develop aircraft while our neighbor is received aircraft and high tech in large numbers.I think you are mistaking me with someone else, I never said anything about qaher or fighter jet, even if I did, fighter jets are not a candy. They take years and years to finish development (assuming the funding is there). I think your problems is patience. You need to have patience. Seeing is believing, so just wait, in this year you'll see the missiles.
Missiles and fighter jet are two difference things here. Iranian missile industry is top notch whereas the fighter jet sector needs much, much more funding. Now that Iran will be richer, you'll see more money for jet figher. It is just a matter of time.
I. But for longer ranges we need a better solid fuel. I mean look at U.S solid ICBMs . They have the same size as sejjil but 13000 km range .