So…with the unveiling of K-4 . What does it tell us about the future path of the IRGC-AF ?
Solid fuel engines are getting thicker, liquid fuel engines are getting thicker. Greater payload delivery seems to be the focus. (Which can also translate to range). Better anti-ABM performance is clearly the case in all areas.
The question I ask. Where’s the end game? At a certain point the larger the diameter; you will build an ICBM, even if you advertise it as a sub 2k missile with a massive payload.
Aside from the obvious superior anti-ABM performance, what advantages does this really give compared to any other solid fuel missile or Emad missile which are easier to produce.
In my view, the main goal is range -> but also a missile with high performance in these IRBM ranges.