What's new

Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

.
From the start though they sanctioned Iran and imposed war on Iran through Saddam. Look at Turkey, a NATO ally, an obedient vassal state for the last 40 years, until recently with erdogan and the coup, but their currency has lost most of its value in the last few years as well. 10 years ago 1 USD = 1.2 Lira Now 1 USD = 5.86 Lira and before that they had to take off 3 zeroes because of constant devaluation, inflation. In any case, at this point in time, I would say 100,000 Rial to 1 USD would be ideal. If a Democratic president gets elected, the US will most likely rejoin the nuclear deal. Trumps pressure campaign really hasn't worked. Despite everyday Iran's economy is growing in 2020/2021. Unfortunately Trump is just a Zionist zombie and when it comes to Iran, his demands are completely unrealistic. Iran's best choice right now from a geopolitical standpoint is to give it's proxies in Iraq advanced weapons and to give the Taliban a limited amount of weapons, which they can use during the upcoming spring offensive. From now until this spring and beyond, Iran has to pressure the US as much as possible. That's pretty much all Iran can do at this point.

As I said in another post, this was not the first time this regime used “airplane crash” to get through and fulfill its dirty agendas. Also, the economic problem with the country is not Trump, neither the sanctions. The estate currency has lost its value continuously since this corrupt regime came to power more than 4 decades ago, even when no ‘effective’ sanctions were in place for the first three decades of their ruling. Few days ago the ratio of the market Rial-now to Rial-then reached again to 145,000/75~1,900 times! It is very ironic that Rial experienced its major loss in value before the effective sanctions took place during Mr. Saboorjian’s presidency: 12,000/75 ~ 160 vs. 135,000/12000~ 11.2
 
.
The Danish account on the demoralizing effect of a very limited BM attack shows what true shock and awe is. "Helicopters split in half".
I bet those night time C-130 flights were mainly to remove those wreckage.

General Salami also confirmed that 2 missiles failed inside Iran. So if original 15 missiles, 13 hit the targets.
 
.
The Danish account on the demoralizing effect of a very limited BM attack shows what true shock and awe is. "Helicopters split in half".
I bet those night time C-130 flights were mainly to remove those wreckage.

General Salami also confirmed that 2 missiles failed inside Iran. So if original 15 missiles, 13 hit the targets.
Did they say if it was the solid fueled or liquid fueled missiles that had malfunctioned?
 
.
testimony of Danish military Sergeant present at time of Iran IRGC missile strike at U.S. military base Ain Al-Assad in Iraq, talking to channel 2 Danish news

In a bunker in Iraq, Danish sergeant John and the other Danish soldiers waited for several hours for the Iranian attack on the Ain al-Asad military base in Al Anbar province in western Iraq overnight. - It was terrible. It cannot be described and it should not be experienced. We could do nothing, we could just accept. So we couldn't use our training in that situation, he tells TV 2. then came the attack. - Suddenly the first layer comes, as I call it. Nine rockets a barely a ton each. It cannot be described. I've never experienced anything like it, and I hope to never come to it again, says John. Violent attack The attack was so severe that the bunker shook, and dust penetrated in large quantities. - We had to sit with scarves on our faces just to breathe, says John. But it was the ignorance and powerlessness that were the worst for the Danish soldiers. The ignorance of how close to the next one is and when it will come. After all, we had no idea down there. We could just sit and take a seat. We couldn't do any of what we're trained for. We could just wait, says John. The Danish soldiers reacted differently along the way. - Some sit and tell jokes to protect themselves. Some are closing in on themselves, and some are shedding a tear, says the Danish sergeant. The first setbacks were so severe that we were sure we were going to a golden desert and nothing was left. We were really surprised it wasn't over our heads. I would estimate that the nearest rocket hit 300 feet from us, and as we walked around afterwards, there were half helicopters and holes so big that you could park a van in them, John says. Now that the Danish soldiers have been a few days away from the experience, the mood has changed. It is still crowded, but the soldiers are also relieved and they enjoy themselves in Kuwait, playing cards and talking to the family at home. Psychologists are now on their way to Kuwait to help the Danish soldiers recover from the experience.

 
. .
The first setbacks were so severe that we were sure we were going to a golden desert and nothing was left. We were really surprised it wasn't over our heads. I would estimate that the nearest rocket hit 300 yards from us, and as we walked around afterwards, there were half helicopters, and there were holes so big that you could park a van in them, John says

Yeap.... minimal damage to structures and equipment..... you´d hardly notice any difference..... all the missiles missed, and the brave men´s training kicked in.
 
Last edited:
. . . .
When Iran Attacks

On January 8, 2020, Iran used ballistic missiles to attack U.S. air bases in Iraq, in response to the U.S.-targeted killing of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force (IRGC-QF) commander Qasem Soleimani. The attack against U.S. bases in Iraq demonstrates that Tehran continues to rely on its missile forces as a tool for signaling, diplomacy, propaganda, deterrence, and retaliation. The precise character of the attack also confirms that Iran’s missile capabilities have advanced considerably in recent years. Such deliberate targeting may have allowed Iran to avoid killing U.S. military personnel, thereby achieving strategic effects while minimizing the risk of further escalation. It also serves, however, as a warning that Iran’s missiles pose a credible threat to U.S. and allied military forces in the region.

Q1: What did Iran do?

A1: Around 1:30 a.m. local time on January 8, Iran fired around 15 ballistic missiles against two military bases in Iraq that housed U.S. troops, Ain Al Asad air base near Baghdad and another facility near Erbil in northern Iraq. Iran likely launched the missiles from its missile bases around Kermanshah near Iraq, which it has used for previous missile launches into Iraq and Syria over the past two years.

Neither the U.S. nor the Iraqi government has reported any causalities, but early analysis of open-source satellite imagery suggests that the missiles destroyed several buildings at Ain Al Asad, including what appear to be aircraft hangers. Iran reportedly gave warning to the Iraqi government around 90 minutes before the strike.

Q2: What was Iran hoping to accomplish?

A2: This attack probably supported several Iranian objectives. First and foremost, it served as a response to the killing of Soleimani. The strike both signaled Iranian resolve to defend its influence in the region and satisfied pressure from elements of the Iranian population and regime that desired vengeance for his death. This attack was unique in its directness against U.S. forces without any attempt to obscure the source of the attack. Rather, Iranian officials promptly claimed credit for the attack on state-run news outlets and on social media. In many of its other recent operations, by contrast, Iran has deflected attribution through its use of regional proxy forces and straight denial.

Certain details of the strike also seem to indicate a level of restraint on Iran’s part. Iran provided the Iraqi government with advance warning, giving time for both U.S., Iraqi, and other allied forces to prepare. The precision of the attack may have allowed Iran to more carefully choose targets to avoid causing casualties, giving the United States an easier off-ramp to deescalate.

On the other hand, the attack’s surgical character may also serve as a warning about the potential of future attacks. Iran could use missiles with similar accuracy to maximize damage rather than limit it. The lack of casualties in this particular case may have been a success rather than a failure of Iranian missiles or missileers.

Q3: What did Iran fire?

A3: Although the exact missiles used in the attack remain unconfirmed, early evidence suggests Iran fired Qiam-type-type ballistic missiles, and possibly others from its Fateh missile family. Qiams are short-ranged liquid-fueled missiles, an advanced variant of the Scud. It notably has a warhead that separates from the missile’s main body, somewhat uncommon for a short-range missile. Images of debris from Qiam missile bodies in Iraq began circulating on social media shortly after the attack.

Iranian state media also speculate Iran also fired Fateh 110Zolfaghar. Fateh missiles are solid-fueled, meaning they can be launched at short notice because they do not need to be fueled before launch. Some Fateh variants are reportedly able to maneuver during flight, increasing their accuracy.

The Qiam and Fateh models are among the more accurate weapons in Iran’s missile arsenal. A cursory analysis of the satellite imagery suggests, however, that the accuracy of these missiles may be even greater than previously suspected.

Q4: How did U.S. forces react to the attack?

A4: According to President Trump’s remarks, U.S. and Iraqi forces took precautionary measures to weather the attack, which included sheltering and dispersal. The president also credited the U.S. early warning system, which he said, “worked very well.” The president is likely referring to a constellation of overhead satellites known as the Space-based Infrared System (SBIRS), which can detect the intense heat of ballistic missiles launches. The satellites communicate this information to command and control systems, which distribute that information to allow troops to prepare for incoming, and if in position, to ready missile defenses. The Pentagon has not acknowledged the presence of any missile defense systems at either Ain Al Asad air base or the base near Erbil.

Q5: Has Iran done anything like this before?

A5: Iran has launched similar missile attacks into Iraq and Syria in recent years, although never targeting U.S. personnel. On June 2017, Iran launched six missiles into eastern Syria targeting Islamic States positions near Deir-Ez Zour in retaliation for Islamic States attacks in Tehran. Iran carried out a similar attack against the Islamic State a year later in October 2018. In September 2018, Iran launched seven Fateh-110 missiles at the alleged headquarters of the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Iran and Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan in Koya, Iraq.

Beyond these direct attacks originating from Iran itself, the IRGC-QF has proliferated missile and rockets around the region. Due to IRGC-QF support, Hezbollah in Lebanon now possesses over 130,000 missiles and rockets, and Iran has supplied missiles and drones to its Houthi allies in Yemen. Most recently, the IRGC-QF has been supplying rockets and missiles to pro-Tehran militias in Iraq, which have used these weapons against U.S. facilities in Iraq. This includes the deadly rocket attack on December 27, 2019, which sparked the recent cycle of escalation.

https://www.csis.org/analysis/when-iran-attacks
 
.
"You looked around at each other and you think: Where are we going to run? How are you going to get away from that?" said Ferguson.

"I don't wish anyone to have that level of fear," he said. "No one in the world should ever have to feel something like that."




23339858-7881839-image-m-45_1578922828382.jpg


23339850-7881839-image-m-48_1578922912393.jpg


23339854-7881839-image-a-58_1578923523664.jpg


23339856-7881839-image-a-61_1578923649225.jpg


23339842-7881839-image-a-82_1578923800856.jpg


23339848-7881839-image-a-91_1578923844168.jpg


23339844-7881839-image-a-85_1578923815421.jpg


23339846-7881839-image-a-89_1578923838365.jpg




https://edition.cnn.com/2020/01/13/...e-al-asad-base-iraq-exclusive-intl/index.html
 
. .
. .
Back
Top Bottom