What's new

Interesting article in german spiegel magazine about indian elections and hindu radicals

Indien: Hindus schüren im Wahlkampf Hass auf Muslime - SPIEGEL ONLINE

I just will give you the basics info in short and will not issue any opinion since i´m european and not indian and i have no insight in indian policies.

The article says that Modi has good chances to become the next PM of india but his party has to close connections to a radical hindu group called RSS. The members of this group are facists and radicals and comitt terrorist acts as well as murders.

The articles says that the RSS want christians as well as muslims pushed out of india and blame them for any problems that happen there.

It says that this religious fanatics spread over india and have over 40.000 local groups in 2013.

The article states that the founder of this RSS wanted total submission of all non hindus and that they should have no rights.

The article says that Modi party BJP is under complete control of the neo facist RSS and all non Hindus must fear progroms if he will win.

The journalist Ulrike Putz says that Modi is direct responsible for the murder of more than 1000 people in his provice Gujarat in 2002. She says it was a slaughter worse than in the middle ages and the BJP and Modi direct supported this:

DER SPIEGELÂ 19/2002 -
Blutrausch wie im Mittelalter


The EU and also USA do not allow Modi to travel here, because his extreme violations of human rights.

Thats the translation in short.


Many Christian missionary corporations are getting their red and white underwear into twists, because the only frontier they could easily won before look towards Islamic countries is India; to harvest more souls for conversion. The China and east Asia has already fallen. BJP with his anti conversion credentials have irked many thugs who aboard flights to sneak into Indian heartlands to lie poor people that they are here to heal.

Here is another article for everyone to ponder how not only the larger religious motive of western nation which are always their as the base of their expeditions but politico-national agenda they use these organizations (NGO's and media) for.

BTW from the material and choice of words of this article, I can fairly say that the intended readers of this piece are half literate morons from subcontinent background; who will be impressed by this articles but are going to ignor the fact that it has invoked the Godwin's law, which means the author has lost it and readers doesn't know that now this article is not even worth a penny but a fallacy of an argument/discourse, which can only be drafted by Idiots or highly biased rascals.
 
Sorry, forgot to add the article which is worth opening into a new thread.

Obama quietly reverses Hillary’s ‘get Modi’ policy

He claimed that "rather than US NGOs, (the former) Secretary of State Clinton favoured operating through organisations based in the Netherlands, Denmark and the Scandinavian countries, especially Norway" as these were outside the radar of big power politics. These NGOs were active in the agitation against the Russian nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu, with "funding coming mainly from a religious organisation based in Europe that has close links with France".

"In 2011, some bones were discovered in a Gujarat field by one of the search teams and there was much excitement, but these were later found to be buffalo bones", an official said. The official added that "no evidence whatsoever of mass graves was uncovered in Gujarat despite six years of clandestine searching for them" by undercover experts posing as representatives of NGOs.

Lol buffalo bones for Ms Clinton's cunt.
 
Germany talking about fanatics/neo-fascist/radicals??? :D

What an IRONY??? :D

@Markus we are testing Agni-6, & Modi has Italy & Germany both in mind when he will use it :tup:

We don't give a damn about Opinions of either you or your nation. Now cry me a river..............

While I agree with rest of the post here,we are not testing any agni-6 at the moment
 
Well why don´t take the time to show what your opinion is. Its a fact that Modi was not allowed to travel to EU and USA blocked him too for massive violations of human rights. So my guess is, that there is something true?
Germans should be the last ones telling us about fascism and secularism.After what world has seen of them in world war 2 :D
 
Germany talking about fanatics/neo-fascist/radicals??? :D

What an IRONY??? :D

@Markus we are testing Agni-6, & Modi has Italy & Germany both in mind when he will use it :tup:

We don't give a damn about Opinions of either you or your nation. Now cry me a river..............

Mind your own business Germans.:coffee:

Like above poster said, look at the irony that Godwin's law is evoked by that German clown.
 
:D

Just because the Europeans or the west have to be politically correct don't mean that they need to hate on the Hindu fanatic who is trying to safeguard his only home from the Muslim fanatic.

The difference between a Hindu fanatic and a Muslim fanatic is that an Hindu fanatic is fighting for survival in his last home while the Muslim fanatic is fighting to turn the whole world into retards in his quest to install the caliph.

These Europeans would be soon fighting for their survival - not against Modi and his Hindu fanatics but against the thousand plus jihadi groups and their billion plus followers. They are already raping your daughters enmasse and turning your kids into zombies to blow themselves up in marketplaces and act like retards who rejoice in killing of women and children, Let's see who has the last laugh when the shit hits the fan.
 
The illegitimate, traitor 'government' in New Delhi cannot enter into any IAEA agreements for India. No IAEA inspections of any Indian facilities, beyond those that were under such inspections on January 1, 2006, will be allowed. Even those facilities that were under IAEA inspections on January 1, 2006 may, in fact will, be withdrawn from such inspections.

The traitors of the B.J.P. responded to my reference to the firangi control of India's media by trying to divert attention away from the firangi enemy -- and the firangis' invasion of India in the form of the IAEA inspections -- and direct it toward other Indians (which is what Bangladeshis, like other muslims of the subcontinent, are); a B.J.P. spokesman referred to Bangladeshi "infiltration", never mind the firangis' invasion of India's nuclear program and infiltration -- which in fact is almost total control -- of Indian media, government, politicians, etc. The nuclear bomb that will destroy New Delhi will destroy the B.J.P. traitors as surely as any other.

As I have said getting India's nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards, whether or not India imports American reactors, has been a prime American goal because at least 75% of the damage to India's nuclear program would have been done once the facilities are placed under IAEA inspections, even if nothing further is done and no nuclear deal with the United States is finally signed and no foreign reactors, from the United States or from Russia or France, are bought. Any move to put Indian nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards, beyond the ones under IAEA inspections at present, is a grave injury to the nation and an invasion of India like the American invasion of Iraq and deserves a response appropriate to an invasion.

A country that has ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the continental United States cannot be restricted from importing, without IAEA inspections, etc., however much uranium it wants from wherever it wants by the United States or any other power; the power of nuclear weapons is what India needs; electricity can be produced in numerous other ways for the time being. Agreeing to even talks on new inspections with the IAEA -- an instrument of American imperialism -- are acts of treason and deserve commensurately severe punishment. Nuclear supremacy over the United States has to be India's national objective and its one point agenda. The IAEA inspections are totally incompatible with nuclear supremacy over the United States and deserve to be summarily rejected without going into any details.

The assault on India's nuclear program, of which the IAEA inspections are the central part, is the present day version of a foreign invasion. Military supremacy over an invader is not optional but essential for survival. Military supremacy today means nuclear supremacy. But "nuclear supremacy" or "strategic nuclear supremacy" for India is not even mentioned by Indian politicians, press, 'strategic experts', etc., infiltrated and controlled as they are by the firangi enemy. As I have said, many Iraqi generals were bought up by Americans in the course of their 2003 invasion but it did not make it any less of an invasion and the invasion was expressly called an invasion on Iraq's nuclear program. The fact that many Indian politicians and others have been bought up does not make this any less of an invasion. This is a war for survival and for independence and requires the energy, speed, commitment and a full spectrum mobilisation appropriate to a war.

Internal security is a necessary component of national security. For India, internal security requires the following:

1) Citizen inspectors should constantly inspect all nuclear facilities, particularly those included in the 'civilian list' for IAEA inspections, for any signs of inspections by firangis or their agents brought in the past or future, by stealth or otherwise, to ensure that no IAEA inspections take place.

2) No firangi should be allowed on the streets of Indian cities or elsewhere unless accompanied by firangi-watchers and firangi-hunters and can satisfy the latter that he/she is going for some legitimate purpose -- such as buying food -- and will not engage in activities to infiltrate/subvert Indian institutions or individuals in any way by engaging in conversations or other interactions/associations that are not legitimate such as asking the price of a food item he/she wants to buy.

3) Any Indian found associating with firangis in any way should be beaten to death on the spot.

In a country such as North Korea, firangi-watchers and firangi-hunters could ensure that no firangi can subvert any institutions or individuals in their country. But then the firangis enforce/threaten to enforce their control over their country by military force/invasion. IAEA inspections are always backed up by military force/invasions by the firangis. In India, the military and civil servants have always been loyal to the firangis, as I showed in 'The Day India's Emperor Was Arrested By A Lone Englishman' (in my blog). In addition, as I said in the same place, "No one in Delhi/New Delhi wants nuclear supremacy for India" (see my article titled 'Why Nuclear Supremacy?' in my blog ) and thus the entire population of Delhi/New Delhi consists of traitors. That is why killing off the politicians, the military, the civil servants and the rest of the population of Delhi/New Delhi with a nuclear bomb is necessary to save India as a whole; the ban against the firangis can then be enforced in the rest of India till India has ten thousand nuclear warheads and can kill off the entire population of the most powerful firangi country.

Like the bomb blasts in Bangalore and Ahmedabad and the firing along the Line of Control in J & K, the Amarnath land row, "the worst communal flare-up … since 1947" (Hindustan Times), was instigated by C.I.A.-RAW to take attention away from the firangi enemy and his invasion of India with the IAEA inspections, etc. -- just as the communal riots in 1947 were instigated by the Intelligence Bureau which, as I have said, remained loyal to the British after 1947, so the stupid Indians killed one another by the millions while keeping the top firangi, Mountbatten, Governor General of "independent" India. As I have repeatedly said "No more than about 80,000 British, women and children included, ruled India for centuries. Nothing that can be said about the stupidity and slavisheness of Indians will be an exaggeration.” But, with a nuclear bomb killing a few million of these stupid Indians in Delhi/New Delhi, India as a whole can be saved.

India’s media have continued to shut out the views of India’s greatest scientist while the mediocre Indian who was given the Nobel prize as a dummy substitute for him ( see my blog) is going to address India’s parliament, according to Indian press reports. Such goings on cannot be allowed.

I have referred to “thousands of headlines that are missing from India’s media”. But theirs are not simply crimes of omission; some of them participate in the crimes they are covering up. As I said on August 1, 2008, all Indian media are controlled by the firangis. The media people in Delhi/New Delhi will also die in the nuclear explosion that will destroy Delhi/New Delhi.

The participation by the media in these crimes has had the direst consequences for India, economically, militarily and strategically. A columnist (Tavleen Singh) two decades ago referred to the rewards for such participation such as “senior journalists” being given, “virtually free”, government accomodations in New Delhi that would rent at a minimum of fifty thousand rupees per month at market rates (now they would rent at several lakhs per month) -- upon which she was sent on C.I.A.-RAW-sponsored junkets to the United States to see how well mediocre Indians (like Amartya Sen) were doing at U. S. universities and now she has been an enthusiastic participant in these crimes for many years -- but such participation extends all across the media, from “lifafa” journalists (a term used on an Indian defence forum for journalists who receive envelopes full of cash from the American embassy) to those who simply aspire for a green card. Others participate without any specific inducement. But the participation is universal. A non-specific destruction of New Delhi by a nuclear bomb -- except that it will be centered on RAW headquarters -- will destroy the media also non-specifically.

Arun Shourie, after he was no longer chief editor of the Times Of India, said “Akhbar nahin, sarkar hai” (it is not a newspaper, it is the Government). But the same applies to the media as a whole. Shourie first received documentation of the crimes against India’s greatest scientist in 1982, sent by Indians at a U.S. university who knew of Shourie’s fame. With a Ph.D. in Economics from a U.S. university, he was undoubtedly a member of the Cabinet Committee on Economic Strategy that Vajpayee formed to steal my proposal about money. His columns against the nuclear deal do not make him any less of a participant in the above crimes. I received ‘coverage’ from a reporter from The Asian Age who was waiting to interview me, of all the candidates, after I filed my nomination from the East Delhi Lok Sabha constituency in 1996, to learn my “strategy” for winning and, after the election, the provincial head of the Congress Party showed knowledge of the fruits of that interview -- not because it was published -- and commented to me on the futility of my running since I was not known to the public. The media people who will die in the nuclear explosion that will destroy Delhi/New Delhi will include both those who are known and those who are unknown to the public.

Of all the PILs to the Supreme Court regarding the nuclear deal, only mine had asked for the removal from office and prosecution of Manmohan Singh for treason and violation of his oath of office by failing to uphold India’s sovereignty and the Supreme Court has failed to act on my PIL (I have pointed out in my blog that whereas the Supreme Court has dismissed various PILs regarding the nuclear deal on various grounds, it cannot dismiss mine because my PIL points to violations of specific provisions of the Constitution by specific acts by a specific individual and seeks a specific remedy; so it has simply failed to act on mine). In doing so, the Supreme Court is also participating in the cover up of the above crimes against India’s greatest scientist and the greatest Indian of all time that were pointed to in the PIL and is, thus, participating in those crimes. The loyalty of the judiciary, no less than that of the military and the civil servants, has always been to the firangi and the judiciary in all its aspects -- from robes and language to the enforcement of British-made laws -- is a flagrant continuation of firangi rule over India. The nuclear bomb explosion in New Delhi/Delhi that will destroy firangi rule over India will destroy the Supreme Court also.

The criminals of the Supreme Court, loyal as they are to the firangis (above), could not give a hoot for India’s sovereignty and they show it in their behaviour. India’s Parliament, from the Speaker to individual MPs, has also shown its indifference to India’s sovereignty. The surrender of India’s sovereignty by the Executive is known to everyone. India’s sovereignty rests only in me. I am India’s sovereign.

Indians as a rule are inferior Indian ******* unfit to talk about strategic matters, especially when it involves the White Master in any way, which it always does. That is why in his only reference to India in his 'Mein Kampf', Adolf Hitler said "As for India, I would rather see India under the British than under any one else". It is not just that a handful of the British from half way around the world ruled India for centuries; a lot of other people did that from various countries for a thousand years.

A modern day Babar will start each day by killing a million Indians before breakfast every morning, though some think three million will be better (this number can be herded into fairly small extermination circles and then a neutron bomb exploded over them).

I am an Indian, but as far above the other Indians as an avatar is above ordinary mortals.

On an Indian defence forum, someone who took part in building, with Israeli help, the radar imaging satellite that India just launched, recalls:

" I was with Indian Space prior to my retirement and I was part of the 8 or 10 ( just a handful ) people's group which was formed for this satellite. It was so secretive project that even our PAs and TSs did not know why we were meeting so often. The receiving system was ready in Nov2007 when I had not retired . I remember an amusing incident when that system was installed .. it did not work.. and finally the fault was traced to a Fiber Cable eaten by a r a t. A foreigner joked : Indian rats like hi-tec things .. they did not eat any other copper cable only the Fiber cable. "

This Indian may or may not realise it but when the Israeli referred to "Indian rats", he meant the Indian people whom he was referring to as vermin who deserve to be exterminated. I have written repeatedly (see my blog) about the deadly poison that is Israeli, American and other foreign technological 'help' to India which keeps India from developing its own capabilities and keeps it in a dependent, childlike relationship to the white man; about Israeli 'help' to India I said in another thread here: "This ethnic group has gone all out, for the past 32 years, to host a parade of Indians in government, politics and other areas for the “bribery of contact” ... and other kinds of bribes and multifarious and harmful arms, military, intelligence and strategic ‘aid‘, such as during the Kargil war sponsored by the C.I.A. (below), as cover for its infinitely greater injuries to India, including fatal economic, military and strategic injuries."

For perspective, that post is worth repeating in full:-

"An article (by Kaplan) in the New York Times of December 8, 2008 called for separating north and central India from the south, treating it as part of the Middle East and for America to be “at all places [of the Middle East, of which India, according to him, is a part] at once … with every bit of energy and constant attention that our national security apparatus -- and those of our allies -- can bring to bear”, including troops, colonising India with invasions and military operations as the United States has colonised the rest of the Middle East. This is the “jurisdiction” over India the Americans are claiming. The same article -- this was before Obama assumed office -- named Holbrooke as the U.S. envoy to the subcontinent who will bring about this overt colonisation of the subcontinent. And Holbrooke it is who has been appointed for this task! Obama has been made president by an ethnic group which controls not just the media in the United States but its government and foreign policy. It is their aim to turn the subcontinent into a part of the Middle East and part of an overt American empire. Kaplan belongs to this ethnic group. Both of Holbrooke’s parents and his wife have been from this ethnic group. This ethnic group has gone all out, for the past 32 years, to host a parade of Indians in government, politics and other areas for the “bribery of contact” (above and below) and other kinds of bribes and multifarious and harmful arms, military, intelligence and strategic ‘aid‘, such as during the Kargil war sponsored by the C.I.A. (below), as cover for its infinitely greater injuries to India, including fatal economic, military and strategic injuries. This ethnic group has established substantial control, not the least over media including cinema and cinema theater chains, since a letter of mine that appeared in Delhi’s ‘Patriot’ newspaper about the movie ‘Schindler’s List’ on the World War II holocaust. Afghanistan is the land of the Rig Veda where India's Vedic culture originated. The U.S. occupation of Afghanistan is occupation of India, just as U.S. attacks on Pakistan are attacks on India. India IS the real target of U.S. occupation of Afghanistan and partial occupation of Pakistan, as I have said above. The United States' occupation of Afghanistan, its drone attacks on Pakistan, etc., are directed toward eventually occupying India and establishing overt colonial rule over the entire Indian subcontinent. Unfortunately, the people and governments of the subcontinent are children who do not know what is going on and the fate that awaits them. Each day that goes by without India engaged in a crash program of producing ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the United States is a precious day lost in a war for survival. India's Foreign Minister, Pranab Mukherjee, who has been facilitating this and whom Holbrooke sees on his imperial visits to India, is a C.I.A. agent who was the one who signed the Defence Framework Agreement with the United States -- aimed at establishing a colonial relationship between the U.S. and Indian armed forces -- a few weeks before the nuclear deal -- which is aimed at capping, rolling back and eliminating India's nuclear weapons program -- was announced. Mukherjee is far from being the only member of the Indian government under U.S. control. I have said one nuclear bomb will be targeted at the RAW headquarters and another at North and South Blocks in New Delhi to destroy enough of these traitors and start on a program of what India needs to do to survive and defeat its mortal enemies which ane NOT Pakistan and China; RAW tries mightily to keep Indians preoccupied with thinking of Pakistan and China as its enemies.

India-Pakistan conflicts of today are no different from the Hindu-Muslim rioting that accompanied the partition in 1947 and was instigated by the Intelligence Bureau which had remained loyal to the British after 1947. The only change is that the United States has taken the place of Britain. RAW, which was split off from the Intelligence Bureau, functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India and something similar is the case with the other intelligence agencies of the region. They are used for terrorist acts in the Subcontinent by the C.I.A. for various purposes, just as the Kargil war was staged by C.I.A.-RAW, with the help of Pakistan's C.I.A.-controlled army chief (Musharraf), to help Vajpayee win the election that was pending after he had lost a vote of confidence and thus help him remain prime minister; Vajpayee used to be an informant for the British before Independence and has been a C.I.A. agent since the United States replaced Britain as the imperial power over the subcontinent and he is far from being the only politician who has been a C.I.A. agent. Nehru was a life-long British agent, as he admitted to American ambassador Galbraith and his descendents (Indira, Rajiv) have been C.I.A. agents, though they also had a relationship with the KGB because Indira became prime minister by the KGB's assassination of Shastri in Tashkent at the C.I.A.'s request. A C.I.A. specialist on India who came on Bharat-Rakshak forum a few months ago was asking that India acquiesce in the American invasion and occupation of Pakistan and later of India. He said that Pakistan's defences have been electronically neutralised to allow the ingress of Predator drones (this was before the drone attacks started) and that Pakistan's military is quite cooperative; Musharraf was not the only C.I.A. agent in the military. So it all boils down to continued white rule over India and Pakistan after 1947; it is just that the control of these countries has been transferred to covert agencies and they are nominally independent. The United States now wants to overtly occupy and rule the subcontinent, starting with Pakistan. The natives are willing to fight other non-white people like tigers, but behave like obedient dogs to the white master. RAW actively works to make overt American rule over India happen and India's so-called ruling class -- actually, puppet class -- is only too happy at the prospect because it felt orphaned when the British left India.

The firangi is India and Pakistan's common enemy. They both need to defend against the firangi. They can do so while remaining separate nations and coordinating their defence. Or they can end the partition imposed on them by the British 'divide and rule' policy. Because of the firangi's skill in dividing people, they will be safer ending the partition."

I wrote above that "one nuclear bomb will be targeted at the RAW headquarters and another at North and South Blocks in New Delhi to destroy enough of these traitors and start on a program of what India needs to do to survive and defeat its mortal enemies which ane NOT Pakistan and China". But now I am saying India can deliver one twenty kiloton nuclear bomb to Washington and another to New York, accompanied by a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago, to destroy its enemies and India can and must do so NOW, with the capabilities it already has. And India should do so without waiting for Pakistan to do anything.
 
Seriously,fuckers killed millions in concentration camps


Don't bother, because they will be crying their *** off as to why they were so politically correct.

In December, two new studies, one funded by the German government, found that the majority of Muslims believe that Islamic Sharia law should take precedence over the secular constitutions and laws of their European host countries.

"Critics of Islamic ideology and its organizations are constantly confronted with lawsuits and have to legally defend themselves against the accusations of blasphemy or incitement-to-hatred. Even if it does not come to a conviction, such processes cost a lot of time and money…Thus... we are experiencing a de facto application of Islamic law." — Felix Strüning, Gustav Stresemann Foundation Report.

"[It] must be recognized: democracies must beware of those who believe a free society is something that needs to be vanquished." — Die Welt.

What follows is a chronological review of some of the most important stories about the rise of Islam in Germany during 2013:

In January, the Turkish-run Kuba Camii Mosque in Eschweiler, a city situated along the German-Belgian-Dutch border and about 50 kilometers (30 miles) west of Cologne, for the first time began publicly calling Muslims to prayer.

The call to prayer was described as an "historical event" and was attended by numerous dignitaries, including the Turkish consul and the Turkish attaché.

The Turkish imam of the Kuba Camii Mosque, Bahri Ciftci, declared his hopes that "the public prayer call will be a symbol of a tolerant, intercultural and interreligious common coexistence."

The mayor of Eschweiler, Rudi Bertram, said, "Tolerance must be practiced on a daily basis. We are all responsible for ensuring that there is a co-existence."

The mosque is one of a growing number of Islamic institutions in Germany publicly calling the Muslim faithful to prayer—five times a day, seven days a week—with cries of Allahu Akbar! ("Allah is Greater!").

The sonorous prayer calls (known in Arabic as adhan) can be heard from great distances when amplified through electric loudspeakers. Critics say some German towns and cities are beginning to evoke the sounds and images of the Islamic Middle East.

On January 14, the City-State of Bremen signed a so-called state treaty with city's 40,000-strong Muslim community. The agreement guarantees the protection of Muslim community properties, the approval of the construction of mosques with minarets and domes, the allotment of land for Muslim cemeteries, the supplying of halal food at prisons and hospitals, the recognition of three Muslim holidays, Muslim representation in state institutions and several other rights and privileges.

According to Erol Pürlü, the spokesman of the Koordinationsrat der Muslime [Muslim Coordination Council], a Turkish-Muslim umbrella group, the treaty with Bremen "sends a clear signal that Islam belongs to Germany."

Bremen is the second German state to sign a treaty with local Muslim communities. Hamburg, the second-largest city in Germany, concluded a "historic treaty" with the city's 200,000-strong Muslim community in November 2012.

Critics say the agreements do little to encourage Muslim integration into German society and instead will boost the growing influence of Islam in the country by encouraging the perpetuation of a Muslim parallel society.

Also in January, a court in Berlin convicted two Islamists of being members of al-Qaeda and sentenced them to a combined 15 years in prison.

Yusuf Ocak, 27, from Lübeck, Germany, and Maqsood Lodin, 23, an Austrian of Afghan background, were assigned by al-Qaeda to collect money and recruit members for the terrorist group in Europe. Ocak was arrested in Vienna and Lodin in Berlin in May 2011.

At the time of their arrest, police uncovered a treasure trove of intelligence, including more than 100 al-Qaeda planning documents that described some of the terror group's most audacious plots and a road map for future operations. Future plots include the seizing of cruise ships and carrying out other large-scale terrorist attacks in Europe.

Meanwhile, German security officials warned that the country's support for France's fight against Islamists in Mali had increased the risk of a terrorist attack targeting German interests both at home and abroad.

Citing a classified government report, the daily Bild said on January 29 that more than 100 German Islamists are believed to have received paramilitary training at terrorist training camps abroad, and that half of that group had already returned to Germany. The classified report said the militants included many German converts to radical Islam who have received training from al-Qaeda on how to plan attacks as "autonomous cells" in Germany.

In February, Muslim plans to convert the Kapernaumkirche [Capernaum Church]—a former Lutheran church in the city of Hamburg—into a mosque, generated controversy across Germany.

From Berlin to Dortmund to Mönchengladbach, the proliferation of mosques housed in former churches reflects the rise of Islam as the fastest growing religion in post-Christian Germany.

Major German newspapers greeted the news with apparent resignation, and published editorials with titles such as "When Mosques Replace Churches," "Tenant Allah," "Christian on the Outside, Muslim on the Inside," and "The New Normal."

Also in February, a German-born Islamic jihadist calling himself "Abu Azzam the German" threatened to attack Berlin and kill German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

In a three-minute video posted on the Internet (the video has since been removed), the man can be heard singing in German an Islamic a cappella battle hymn known as a nasheed.

"We want to see Obama and Merkel dead!" he sings. "Our troops are already there [in Germany], what joy. You'll bleed, your heads will roll! ... Oh Allah, give the German people what they deserve!"

Meanwhile, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan told German Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich that Berlin was guilty of "a human rights violation" for insisting that Turkish immigrants who want to live in Germany must integrate and learn the German language.

In March, Germany banned three Salafist Muslim groups the Interior Ministry said wanted to overturn democracy and install a system based on Islamic Sharia law.

The Interior Ministry said on March 13 that it had banned three Islamic groups "DawaFFM," "Islamische Audios" and "An-Nussrah," which is part of the "Millatu Ibrahim" group [The Religious Community of Abraham] that was outlawed in June 2012.

In an effort to enforce the ban, hundreds of German police officers raided the homes of radical Islamists in Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Gladbeck and Solingen, and seized computers, cellphones and electronic storage devices, as well as money, documents and Islamic propaganda videos in Arabic and in German.

"Salafism, as represented in the associations that were banned today, is incompatible with our free democratic order," German Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich said. "The groups aim to change our society in an aggressive, belligerent way so that democracy would be replaced by a Salafist system, and the rule of law replaced by Sharia law."

On March 10, Hans-Georg Maaßen, the head of Germany's domestic intelligence agency, the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV), told the German newsmagazine Focus that the number of committed Salafists in Germany had jumped to 4,500 in 2012, compared to 3,800 in 2011.

Around 70% are Germans and 30% are non-Germans, coming from a variety of nations including Turkey, Morocco and Bosnia, according to an anonymous security official interviewed by the Associated Press. About a quarter of the Salafists in Germany are Muslim converts.

Although Salafists make up only a fraction of the estimated 4.3 million Muslims in Germany, authorities are concerned that most of those attracted to Salafi ideology are impressionable young Muslims who are especially susceptible to committing suicide attacks in the name of Islam.

Maaßen said the Salafist threat to Germany is rising and he warned that unless the government "takes decisive action against violent Islamists" the Salafist groups "will continue to grow and the threat of violence will increase."

On March 13, German police announced they had foiled an Islamist assassination plot against Markus Beisicht, the head of the anti-immigration party PRO NRW (North Rhine-Westphalia).

Police arrested a total of four Salafists involved in the plot. Two of the suspects were apprehended in Leverkusen near Cologne, where they were apparently observing Beisicht. Two others were arrested in Essen and Bonn, where police discovered a loaded firearm and ingredients to make explosives. Police also found a "death list" with the names of eight individuals marked in red.

On March 24, the citizen's movement Die Freiheit Bayern (Freedom Bavaria) organized a demonstration against a project to build a mega-mosque in the southern German city of Munich.

The massive mosque complex—known as the Center for Islam in Europe-Munich (ZIE-M)—will cost an estimated €40 million ($51 million) and is designed to be a key strategic platform for spreading Islam throughout Europe.

Speculation is rife that the Persian Gulf Emirate of Qatar will pay for the project, although the Qatari Ambassador to Germany told the newspaper Münchner Merkur that no final decision has been made.

In April, Peer Steinbrück, the chancellor candidate for the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), said at a campaign stop in Berlin that he supported the idea of physical education classes in German schools being divided by gender as a courtesy to Muslims.

Steinbrück said: "If schools are able to do it, then they should." After his comment was greeted with silence, Steinbrück added that the measure should be taken "out of consideration for [Muslim] religious convictions."

The reaction to Steinbrück's comments was immediate and fierce from across Germany's political spectrum, an indication that overt support for multiculturalism is becoming a political liability in Germany.

On the same day that Steinbrück made his controversial comments about Muslim-friendly gym classes, Germany's Central Council of Muslims (ZMD) demanded that the German government introduce statutory Muslim holidays throughout Germany.

In an interview with the daily newspaper Westdeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung (WAZ) on April 3, council chairman Aiman Mazyek said that granting one day during the month of Ramadan and another on the fast-breaking day of Eid al-Fitr would be "an important sign of integration" and "would emphasize tolerance in our society."

The proposal was not well received. Wolfgang Bosbach, a member of parliament for the ruling Christian Democrats (CDU), told WAZ that he sees "far and wide no need" for the legal recognition of Muslim holidays, adding that Germany has "no Muslim tradition." The current public holidays—such as Christmas and Easter—are part of a Christian-Western heritage, Bosbach said.

Also in April, Bavaria became the first state in Germany to classify so-called Islamophobes as extremists. The Bavarian branch of Germany's domestic intelligence agency, the BfV, also began monitoring German activists accused of fomenting hate against Muslims due to their "unconstitutional" opposition to the construction of a mega-mosque in Munich.

The move to silence critics of the mosque was announced by Bavarian Interior Minister Joachim Herrmann in a press conference on April 12, and represented an unprecedented threat to the exercise of free speech in post-reunification Germany.

Herrmann made the announcement while presenting an annual report about threats to democratic order in Germany. A seven-minute video of the press conference with subtitles in English can be viewed here.

Herrmann singled out Freedom Bavaria as well as the Munich branch of a highly popular free speech blog calledPolitically Incorrect (PI), which focuses on topics related to immigration, multiculturalism and Islam in Germany.

On April 28, a major research study on religious attitudes in Germany found that more than half of all Germans view Islam as a threat to their country and believe it does not belong in the Western world.

The findings confirm the results of dozens of other surveys, and reflect a growing divide between the views of ordinary Germans and those of Europe's multicultural elites, who for decades have promoted mass immigration from Muslim countries.

The study, entitled "Religion Monitor 2013: Religiousness and Cohesion in Germany" (German and English), was produced by the Bertelsmann Foundation, one of the most influential think tanks and lobbying groups in Europe, and a strong proponent of "progressive" causes such as multiculturalism and global governance.

On April 29, the television news program RTL Extra (a 23-minute video of the RTL report can be viewed at YouTube here) explained how Muslim polygamists are being financially supported by German taxpayers.

Although polygamy is banned in Germany by Paragraph 1306 of the Civil Code and Paragraph 172 of the Penal Code, in practice these laws do not apply to Muslims.

The RTL report shows how Muslim men residing in Germany are taking advantage of the social welfare system by bringing two, three or four women from across the Muslim world to Germany, and then marrying them in the presence of an imam, a Muslim religious leader.

Although these polygamous marriages are not officially recognized by the German state—they are technically illegal and punishable by fines and imprisonment—the practice is commonplace among Muslims in all major German cities. In Berlin, for example, it is estimated that fully one-third of the Muslim men living in the Neukölln district of the city have two or more wives.

Once in Germany the women request social welfare benefits, including the cost of a separate home for themselves and for their children, on the claim of being a "single parent with children."

The RTL report says that even though the welfare fraud committed by Muslim immigrants is an "open secret" costing German taxpayers millions of euros each year, government agencies are reluctant to take action due to political correctness.

In May, a major conference on German-Muslim relations ended in failure after Muslims attending the event refused to acknowledge the government's concerns about the threats to security posed by radical Islam.

German Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich had wanted the eighth annual German Islam Conference, held in Berlin on May 7, to focus on finding ways the government could work together with "moderate" Muslims in Germany to combat Islamism and extremism.

But Muslims attending the gathering were apparently offended by the insinuation that Islam could be radical or violent, and demanded instead that the German government take steps to make "Islam equal to Christianity" in Germany.

In June, an appeals court in northwestern Germany decided a contentious divorce case based on Islamic Sharia law. The ruling was one of a growing number of court cases in Germany in which judges refer or defer to Islamic law because either the plaintiffs or the defendants are Muslim.

Critics say the cases—especially those in which German law has taken a back seat to Sharia law—reflect a dangerous encroachment of Islamic law into the German legal system.

The Appeals Court [Oberlandesgericht] in Hamm, a city in German state of North Rhine-Westphalia, ruled on June 2 that whoever marries according to Islamic law in a Muslim country and later seeks a divorce in Germany must abide by the original terms set forth by Sharia law.

The case involved a 23-year-old Iranian woman who married a 31-year-old Iranian man in Iran according Sharia law in 2009. The couple later immigrated to the German city of Essen, gave birth to a daughter but then separated in 2011. A lower court in Essen granted the woman a divorce in November 2012 and the husband appealed the decision.

The appeals court in Hamm sided with the woman because, according to the German judge, the couple agreed to abide by the principles of Sharia law at the time they were married and thus the case should be decided according to Islamic law, regardless of whether the couple was now living in Germany.

The court ruled that the woman was legally entitled to talaq, an Islamic means of obtaining a divorce by reciting the phrase "I divorce you" three times. The court also said the husband had violated the original terms of the Islamic marriage agreement by failing to provide financial support for his wife for a period of six months.

In a similar but separate case in April 2013, the appeals court in Hamm overturned a previous decision by a lower court in Dortmund and ordered an Iranian man to pay his estranged wife (also an Iranian) the equivalent of 800 gold coins as part of a divorce settlement.

That case involved a couple who were married in Iran in 2001, immigrated to Dortmund and later obtained German citizenship. The couple separated in 2007.

As part of the marriage agreement, the husband had promised his wife a dower of 800 Bahar Azadi gold coinspayable upon demand. The court ordered the husband to pay €213,000 ($280,000), the current equivalent value of the coins, in compliance with a marriage contract he signed in accordance with Islamic law, even though both individuals are now German citizens.

Also in June, a Turkish mosque in the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia began sounding public calls to prayer from an outdoor loudspeaker system mounted on the roof of the edifice.

The Fatih Camii Mosque in Wipperfürth, a factory town situated 40 kilometers (25 miles) north-east of Cologne, began publicly calling the Muslim faithful to prayer during a formal "muezzin-induction ceremony" on June 21 attended by local and foreign dignitaries, including the Turkish consul.

The Fatih Camii Mosque—run by the Turkish-Islamic Union for Islamic Affairs (DITIB), a branch of the Turkish government that controls over 900 mosques in Germany—received municipal approval for a muezzin publicly to call Muslims to the mosque for prayer five times a day after Mayor Michael von Rekowski said he wanted to show the world that Wipperfürth "takes pride in being an intercultural and interreligious community."

At the request of the mayor, leaders of the Wipperfürth mosque met with representatives of the Protestant and Catholic churches in town to "integrate" the timing of the Muslim prayer calls into the traditional schedule for the ringing of church bells.

On June 11, the head of Germany's federal agency for domestic intelligence, Hans-Georg Maaßen, presented the annual intelligence report for 2012. Among many items of interest, the 450-page report states that 30 Islamist groups were active in Germany during 2012. The number of estimated Islamists jumped to 42,550, up from 38,080 in 2011.

The report also shows that Hezbollah is using mosques and other Islamic organizations in Germany to raise funds for the terrorist group's activities in Lebanon. The report also shows a steady increase of Hezbollah operatives in Germany: 950 in 2012, up from 900 in 2010.

On June 25, German police foiled an Islamist terror plot to use remote-controlled airplanes filled with explosives as guided missiles. Nearly 100 police raided homes in the German states of Bavaria, Baden-Wurttemberg and Saxony. Two of the suspected plotters were students in the aeronautics department at the University of Stuttgart, who were developing systems for using GPS to guide pilotless aircraft, according to the German public broadcaster SWR.

Meanwhile, the Goethe-Universität in Frankfurt and the Justus-Liebig-Universität in Giessen opened a joint center for Islamic theology. The center is the fourth taxpayer-funded department of Islamic theology in Germany.

In addition to the center in Frankfurt/Giessen, Islamic theology departments have also recently opened at universities in Tübingen (January 2012), Erlangen/Nürnberg (September 2012) and Münster/Osnabrück (October 2012).

Islamic theology courses at German universities are so popular that they are "changing the German religious landscape," according to the news service Deutsche Welle.

German Education Minister Annette Schavan says the Islamic centers are a "milestone for integration" for the 4.3 million Muslims who now live in Germany. She says Germany has a demand for more than 2,000 Islam teachers, who are needed to instruct more than 700,000 Muslim children.

The German government claims that by controlling the curriculum, the schools, which are to train Muslim imams and Islamic religion teachers, will function as an antidote to "hate preachers." Most imams currently in Germany are from Turkey and many of them do not speak German.

But the idea has been criticized by those who worry that the Islamic centers will become a gateway for Islamists who will introduce a hardline brand of Islam into the German university system.

In July, Muslim mobs ushered in the beginning of Ramadan with three nights of rioting in Hamburg. The unrest began on the evening of July 12 when more than 150 Muslim youths attacked police and burned cars in Altona, the westernmost district of Hamburg. More than 100 riot police were deployed to restore order. An 11-minute video of the Hamburg unrest, with cries of "Allahu Akbar!" ("Allah is Greater!) can be viewed here on YouTube.

Also in July, the German news agency Deutsche Welle reported that German military canteens have adapted to Ramadan and altered their menus to provide Muslim soldiers with foods that are prepared according to Islamic Sharia law.

According to Deutsche Welle, army canteens are better equipped than many other large kitchens to prepare food for Muslim and non-Muslim soldiers separately: "The cooks use separate forks and ladles and make sure that the meat is stored separately. And if we grill together, the cooks always have some aluminum foil with them, so that the turkey breast doesn't touch the bacon."

In August, a gang of Islamic radicals in Eisenhüttenstadt, a German city near the border of Poland, attacked a young Muslim couple for violating the Ramadan fast.

During the incident, at least ten Chechen jihadists broke into an apartment at the asylum seekers facility in Eisenhüttenstadt and beat the couple, who are refugees from Chechnya, to the point that the woman suffered a miscarriage. According to local police, Chechen gangs have a history of enforcing Islamic Sharia law in the city.

In September, the state of Lower Saxony signed a preliminary "state treaty" with local Muslim representatives to recognize Islam as an official religion. The document, dated September 30, addresses 30 specific grievances presented by the Muslim community, which constitutes around 7% of the overall population of the state.

"A mutual skepticism has occurred in the past and our government wishes to show its respect to the Muslims with this treaty," according to the minister-president of Lower Saxony, Stephen Weil. Similar "treaties" have also been signed in Bremen and Hamburg.

On September 11, judges at the Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig ordered a Muslim schoolgirl to take part in mixed-sex swimming lessons. Her parents had insisted that the girl, 13, not take part in swimming lessons at her school in Frankfurt because she felt "uncomfortable" swimming with "bare chested" boys near her. She either wanted to be allowed to skip the lessons or be given special instruction on her own.

The court ruled that the "social reality of life in Germany comes above her religious beliefs," and ordered her to attend swimming lessons wearing a full-body-covering garment known as a "burkini" in order to accommodate her beliefs.

On September 19, a dispute in Berlin over efforts by multiculturalists to ban Christmas was resolved after Mayor Klaus Wowereit stepped in to declare that Christmas is still legal. A row erupted after the left-leaning Green Party in the Kreuzberg district of Berlin announced that the traditional Christmas markets that have taken place in the neighborhood for generations would henceforth be held under the religiously-neutral term "Winterfest." Muslims make up roughly one-third of the population in Kreuzberg. Wowereit said he had received complaints about the ban from angry people all across Germany and said the dispute had harmed Berlin's reputation.

Meanwhile, the first Desert Flower Center was opened in Berlin in cooperation with the hospital Waldfriede. The center is the first medical facility in Europe to offer comprehensive treatment for victims of female genital mutilation. Around 50,000 women in Germany are affected by FGM, 20,000 of whom live in Berlin.

The German parliament recently redefined FGM as a criminal offense in its own right, punishable with a jail term of up to 15 years. Previously, it fell under the grievous bodily harm category, with sentencing restricted to a maximum of ten years.

In October, the German newsmagazine Der Spiegel reported that 200 German Islamists fighting against the regime of Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad have gathered in northern Syria and established their own camp, known as the "German Camp." The war-torn country is currently "by far the most attractive location for jihadists," according to a classified intelligence document that was leaked to the magazine.

According to Der Spiegel, the 71-page document sheds light on the extent to which Germany's Muslim population is supporting the Syrian jihadists. Humanitarian aid charities and fundraisers have amassed hundreds of thousands of euros in what intelligence agencies dub "trigger events," where imams collect funds for weapons acquisitions and call on young men to join the jihad.

The newspaper Die Welt said that German security services are increasingly concerned that the fighters will return to Germany more radicalized after potentially receiving terror training from Al-Qaeda and Islamic groups in the country.

In November, the Marzahn-Hellersdorf Adult Education Center in eastern Berlin sparked a nationwide debate after it removed a series of six nude paintings out of deference to Muslim immigrants. Critics said the decision was an overzealous bid at cultural sensitivity.

School officials feared the works may shock Muslim students and prevent them from attending class. The school is located nearby a newly established refugee center, which draws immigrants and asylum-seekers to the neighborhood.

In December, a new study found that the majority of Muslims in Europe believe Islamic Sharia law should take precedence over the secular constitutions and laws of their European host countries.

The "Six Country Immigrant Integration Comparative Survey"—a five-year study of Moroccan and Turkish immigrants in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Holland and Sweden—was published on December 11 by theWZB Berlin Social Science Center, one of the largest social science research institutes in Europe.

According to the study (German and English), which was funded by the German government, two thirds (65%) of the Muslims interviewed say Islamic Sharia law is more important to them than the laws of the country in which they live.

Three quarters (75%) of the respondents hold the opinion that there is only one legitimate interpretation of the Koran, which should apply to all Muslims, and nearly 60% of Muslims believe their community should return to "Islamic roots."

The survey shows that 44% of the Moroccans and Turks interviewed agree with all three of the above statements, which makes them "consistent fundamentalists," and fundamentalist attitudes are just as widespread among younger Muslims as they are among older Muslims.

In a commentary on the study, the German newspaper Die Welt said the findings cast serious doubt upon the unbridled optimism of European multiculturalists, who argue that Muslim citizens will eventually internalize the liberal democratic mindset of Western society.

"The data are not suitable for simple conclusions," the paper writes. "But it must be recognized: democracies must beware of those who believe a free society is something that needs to be vanquished."

Also in December, a discussion paper (German and English) published by the Berlin-based Gustav Stresemann Foundation—a think tank dedicated to the preservation and advancement of liberal democracy in Europe—warns that national and international Islamic organizations are increasingly putting pressure on Western politicians gradually to criminalize any critique of Islam.

The author of the report, the German political scientist Felix Strüning, provides a meticulously detailed analysis of the Islamic lobbying effort—by means of a "human rights lawsuit"—to silence Thilo Sarrazin, a prominent German banker who has criticized the refusal of Muslim immigrants to integrate into German society.

Strüning writes that German political authorities are increasingly bending to pressure from German Islamic organizations by adopting Muslim definitions of "Islamophobia" in public discourse, thus creating legal uncertainty as to "who can say what about Islam and Muslims in Germany."

"Critics of Islamic ideology and its organizations are constantly confronted with lawsuits and have to legally defend themselves against the accusations of blasphemy or incitement-to-hatred," Strüning writes. "Even if it does not come to a conviction, such processes cost a lot of time and money, which in many cases includes one's reputation and possibly even his or her job. Thus, also in the West, we are experiencing an increasing de facto application of Islamic law in matters of Islam."

The Islamization of Germany in 2013

at least we will correct the shit within 10 years - but I pity the Europeans.
 
Indien: Hindus schüren im Wahlkampf Hass auf Muslime - SPIEGEL ONLINE

I just will give you the basics info in short and will not issue any opinion since i´m european and not indian and i have no insight in indian policies.

The article says that Modi has good chances to become the next PM of india but his party has to close connections to a radical hindu group called RSS. The members of this group are facists and radicals and comitt terrorist acts as well as murders.

The articles says that the RSS want christians as well as muslims pushed out of india and blame them for any problems that happen there.

It says that this religious fanatics spread over india and have over 40.000 local groups in 2013.

The article states that the founder of this RSS wanted total submission of all non hindus and that they should have no rights.

The article says that Modi party BJP is under complete control of the neo facist RSS and all non Hindus must fear progroms if he will win.

The journalist Ulrike Putz says that Modi is direct responsible for the murder of more than 1000 people in his provice Gujarat in 2002. She says it was a slaughter worse than in the middle ages and the BJP and Modi direct supported this:

DER SPIEGELÂ 19/2002 -
Blutrausch wie im Mittelalter


The EU and also USA do not allow Modi to travel here, because his extreme violations of human rights.

Thats the translation in short.

This time Indians already decided its better to live under radical Hindus than pseudo secularists. ....
These Jhola Chaap journalists do not have iota of knowledge about India n its people....... If we were so radicals then we would have not waited so long n TOGADIA would have been our PM twice at least ........ There are fundamentalist parties especially for Muslims representation like Muslim league in kerela n MIM in hyderabad but none dig at them becoz its against the pseudo secular fabric of india...
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom