Indira Gandhi's assassins honoured by Akal Takht

[kurup]

show me any who ll?

No tamil has honoured them .

I was quoting him who said that body guards who shot Indira were heroes.

 

[Jaggu]

This was a great move by the Akal Takht. All faithful Sikhs support this. Satwant Singh and Beant Singh the assassins were not even into politics, for them it was revenge. The attack on the Darbar Sahib was such an evil act by Indira Gandhi, she had to pay for this crime.

People can criticize Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwala all they like, but to the average Sikh he has gone down as a hero of the Sikh Panth similar to the other Shaheeds such as Baba Deep Singh or Baba Gurbaksh Singh who also had laid down they lives defending Darbar Sahib in previous centuries.

 

[cloud_9]

This was a great move by the Akal Takht. All faithful Sikhs support this. Satwant Singh and Beant Singh the assassins were not even into politics, for them it was revenge. The attack on the Darbar Sahib was such an evil act by Indira Gandhi, she had to pay for this crime.

People can criticize Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwala all they like, but to the average Sikh he has gone down as a hero of the Sikh Panth similar to the other Shaheeds such as Baba Deep Singh or Baba Gurbaksh Singh who also had laid down they lives defending Darbar Sahib in previous centuries.

Stop drinking that cheap @$$ whisky

 

[Agnostic_Indian]

Stop drinking that cheap @$$ whisky

most probably a false flagr

 

[cloud_9]

most probably a false flagr

Why is he a false flagger?
My quote was directed at his awful comparison...


PS : He's a Sikh Indian/Pakistani/Martian,I'm not sure.

 

[zaxcollix]

This was a great move by the Akal Takht. All faithful Sikhs support this. Satwant Singh and Beant Singh the assassins were not even into politics, for them it was revenge. The attack on the Darbar Sahib was such an evil act by Indira Gandhi, she had to pay for this crime.

People can criticize Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwala all they like, but to the average Sikh he has gone down as a hero of the Sikh Panth similar to the other Shaheeds such as Baba Deep Singh or Baba Gurbaksh Singh who also had laid down they lives defending Darbar Sahib in previous centuries.

Let me get this straight ....Two soldiers who took a VOW to protect the nation and its constitutional head break their VOW and they become heroes?

Two men who took Vows to protect a person, breaks that Vow and kill that person, and they are your heroes ?

Two trained armed men shoot an Unarmed woman and they are your Heroes ?

......your community honor dishonorable men and you expect the rest of India to respect you ?

Instead of honoring men tho serve JUSTICE, you honor men who take REVENGE and you expect rest of India to honor your kind ?

..You honor people who desecrate your own holy temple by carrying weapons inside it and expect others to respect your temple ?

 

[Jaggu]

Nothing awful. Just read any Sikh history book. All Sikh historians quote Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwala as a great Sikh Shaheed while Indira Gandhi is seen as a tyrant by the Sikhs, similar to Aurangzeb or Ahmad Shah Abdali. 1984 is seen as a "Ghalugara"(Sikh holocaust). Operation blue star is one of many such battles Sikhs have fought through out history against tyrants. Tyrants like Indira, Aurangzeb will come and go, but the Shaheeds will live on forever.

Satwant Singh and Beant Singh are also seen in the same light as other great Sikhs of the past who have punished tyrants for their crimes. They are often compared to Sukha Singh Mehtab Singh(killers of Massa Rangar) or Udham Singh(took revenge of Jillianwala Baagh).

 

[zaxcollix]

Nothing awful. Just read any Sikh history book. All Sikh historians quote Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwala as a great Sikh Shaheed while Indira Gandhi is seen as a tyrant by the Sikhs, similar to Aurangzeb or Ahmad Shah Abdali. 1984 is seen as a "Ghalugara"(Sikh holocaust). Operation blue star is one of many such battles Sikhs have fought through out history against tyrants. Tyrants like Indira, Aurangzeb will come and go, but the Shaheeds will live on forever.

Satwant Singh and Beant Singh are also seen in the same light as other great Sikhs of the past who have punished tyrants for their crimes. They are often compared to Sukha Singh Mehtab Singh(killers of Massa Rangar) or Udham Singh(took revenge of Jillianwala Baagh).

Not awful....just funny. There are some people in Tamil Nadu who worship Ravan too and think of him as a great hero

 

[cloud_9]

Nothing awful. Just read any Sikh history book. All Sikh historians quote Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwala as a great Sikh Shaheed while Indira Gandhi is seen as a tyrant by the Sikhs, similar to Aurangzeb or Ahmad Shah Abdali. 1984 is seen as a "Ghalugara"(Sikh holocaust). Operation blue star is one of many such battles Sikhs have fought through out history against tyrants. Tyrants like Indira, Aurangzeb will come and go, but the Shaheeds will live on forever.

Satwant Singh and Beant Singh are also seen in the same light as other great Sikhs of the past who have punished tyrants for their crimes. They are often compared to Sukha Singh Mehtab Singh(killers of Massa Rangar) or Udham Singh(took revenge of Jillianwala Baagh).

Bhindranwala was Indra Gandhi's *****.After realizing that he's not getting the support he expected he did a U-turn and the rest is histrory.
Anjum Choudary is a prime example how people change

We all know,what he was getting at ?

 

[Jaggu]

A vow of a prime minister is first to the nations citizens. If a PM goes against that vow and begins to kill the nation's citizens for political gain, it is the Dharma of every Indian to punish that Prime minister. That is what Satwant Singh and Beant Singh did. Being followers of Dharma, they did a great favour to India by killing Indira Gandhi.

If a Jew had been able to assassinate hitler during the holocaust, today the entire world would have praised him as a hero. Only difference is, we Sikhs got our chance to kill our hitler(Indira Gandhi). Sikhs have never cared what the world thinks of them. Through out history tyrants have always held popular opinion in their favour. This is Kaliyug where tyrants are seen as great while the few warriros who fight by Dharma were seen as rebels, traitors or villains.

 

[zaxcollix]

A vow of a prime minister is first to the nations citizens. If a PM goes against that vow and begins to kill the nation's citizens for political gain, it is the Dharma of every Indian to punish that Prime minister. That is what Satwant Singh and Beant Singh did. Being followers of Dharma, they did a great favour to India by killing Indira Gandhi.

If a Jew had been able to assassinate hitler during the holocaust, today the entire world would have praised him as a hero. Only difference is, we Sikhs got our chance to kill our hitler(Indira Gandhi). Sikhs have never cared what the world thinks of them. Through out history tyrants have always held popular opinion in their favour. This is Kaliyug where tyrants are seen as great while the few warriros who fight by Dharma were seen as rebels, traitors or villains.

1. You are not qualified to judge a Prime Minister of India. For all you know she may have taken the best possible action for India. Dharma dictates that if there is a doubt she did not fulfill her vow , she should have been taken to court. People who decide to be judge, jury and executioner is NOT following any DHARMA.

2. If the two coward singhs wanted to follow Dharma ....they should have first resigned from their position. Made a public declaration of their intent to kill Indra Gandhi and then Killed her by giving her all chance either to explain herself OR defend herself. That is the way of Dharma.

3. If you honor Adharmi's , you become Adharmi yourself and you teach you kids to walk away from their Dharma.

4. Even in Kaliyug ..... people are smart enough to see though bull$hit and judge for themselves.

PS: Even Hitler was more honorable as he first declared war before attacking anyone.

 

[cloud_9]

A vow of a prime minister is first to the nations citizens. If a PM goes against that vow and begins to kill the nation's citizens for political gain, it is the Dharma of every Indian to punish that Prime minister. That is what Satwant Singh and Beant Singh did. Being followers of Dharma, they did a great favour to India by killing Indira Gandhi.

If a Jew had been able to assassinate hitler during the holocaust, today the entire world would have praised him as a hero. Only difference is, we Sikhs got our chance to kill our hitler(Indira Gandhi). Sikhs have never cared what the world thinks of them. Through out history tyrants have always held popular opinion in their favour. This is Kaliyug where tyrants are seen as great while the few warriros who fight by Dharma were seen as rebels, traitors or villains.

Why do you care what others think about Satwant Singh and Beant Singh,they were Sikhs and were honoured by Akal Takht and Sikhs respect them :end of story:

People need to learn history,you just don't walk in..... destroy the Golden Temple premises and walk off.People tried that in the past they got what IG got.

 

[zaxcollix]

Exactly ... running away from public scrutiny is your way ... that way you can continue to be awesome in your own minds.

 

[Jaggu]

1. You are not qualified to judge a Prime Minister of India. For all you know she may have taken the best possible action for India. Dharma dictates that if there is a doubt she did not fulfill her vow , she should have been taken to court. People who decide to be judge, jury and executioner is NOT following any DHARMA.

How just the Indian justice system is we all know. Have Sajjan Kumar or Jagdish tytler been punished after they carried out Anti Sikh riots? so what makes you think that Indira gandhi would have been punished? far from punishing her for her crimes, congress party won a land slide electoral victory because of the attack she carried out against the Sikhs, an Airport in Delhi, collages, schools, universities have been named in her honour. So sorry for not have faith in the legal system for now. Maybe Anna Hazare's anti corruption movement can also fix India's corrupt legal system in future

2. If the two coward singhs wanted to follow Dharma ....they should have first resigned from their position. Made a public declaration of their intent to kill Indra Gandhi and then Killed her by giving her all chance either to explain herself of defend herself. That is the way of Dharma.

You can use that type of (flawed)argument for all rightful assassinations. That's like a British man saying Udham Singh is also a coward by killing dyar by not allowing him first to explain himself of why he killed so many people in Jillianwala baagh. Assassinations always use unorthodox methods, this assassination was no different.

3. If you honor Adharmi's , you become Adharmi yourself and you teach you kids to walk away from their Dharma.

No, attacking the Sri Harmandir Sahib was an evil act of Adharma by a woman who was the very embodiment of Adharma. If she carries out a crime against the Hindus, she is wrong(emergency, supports cow killing, she killed sadhus), but if she carries out evil acts against the Sikhs she is good for you. I would have condemned her if she had attacked a Mandhir killing thousands of Hindu pilgrims. Be fair my brother.

 

[zaxcollix]

How just the Indian justice system is we all know. Have Sajjan Kumar or Jagdish tytler been punished after they carried out Anti Sikh riots? so what makes you think that Indira gandhi would have been punished? far from punishing her for her crimes, congress party was a land slide electoral victory because of the attack she carried out against the Sikhs, an Airport in Delhi, collages, schools, universities have been named in her honour. So sorry for not have faith in the legal system for now. Maybe Anna Hazare's anti corruption movement can also fix India's corrupt legal system in future

1. If you do not have faith in the judiciary system then Dharma dictates that you first FIX the judiciary and then take her to court. There is no short cuts in following Dharma.

2. Democracy also helps you in removing her from office by making your case public and building public support against her based on Dharma.

3. In any case Indra Gandhi was sent to prison by Justice J C Shah Commission that probed the excesses during the 1975-77 emergency.

You can use that type of (flawed)argument for all rightful assassinations. That's like a British man saying Udham Singh is also a coward by killing dyar by not allowing him first to explain himself of why he killed so many people in Jillianwala baagh. Assassinations always use unorthodox methods, this assassination was no different.

Which is why Dharma does not allow for assassinations.

Udham Singh had declared his intention to kill Dyar giving Dyar every chance to protect himself. Maybe now you will understand why Bhagat Singh is a far bigger hero than Udham singh.

Assassination is the way of the coward and those without honor. Its same as sending terrorists into other nations to assassinate their citizens.

No, attacking the Sri Harmandir Sahib was an evil act of Adharma by a woman who was the very embodiment of Adharma. If she carries out a crime against the Hindus, she is wrong(emergency, supports cow killing, she killed sadhus), but if she carries out evil acts against the Sikhs she is good for you. I would have condemned her if she had attacked a Mandhir killing thousands of Hindu pilgrims. Be fair my brother.

There was NO ATTACK ON HARMANDIR SAHIB.

There was attack on terrorists hiding inside Sri Harmandir Sahib. The difference is quite clear.

I am being fair. Are you ?