What's new

How to destroy India's S-400 missiles depots

Patriot786b2

BANNED
Joined
Apr 14, 2019
Messages
615
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
How to destroy India's S-400 missile depot's

0_12ac08_a136d091_orig-min.jpg

Russia may target Ukrainian S-300 missiles depots using Ka-52.

Russia has already plans to take out S-300 Ukrainian missiles depots as counter measurements. They have specific helicopters designed for these types of offensive. The ka-52 attack helicopters.
The alternative to helicopters is to send swarm of drones equipped with beacon radars homing device zero in on s-400 missiles depots inside Indian territory.
China has supplied Pakistan with specialized drones for this purpose but need to be tested.

Some military experts were pointed out that in the event of active hostilities, Russia might use Ka-52 helicopters to destroy surface-to-air missile (SAM) sites in the South of Ukraine.

Babak Taghvaee, a military analyst based in Malta, claimed in a tweet that at least several consecutive days the 3rd Squadron of the 39th Helicopter Aviation Regiment has practiced Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD) mission using Ka-52 attacks helicopters.

He added: “It means, in case of war with Ukraine, its 16 Ka-52s might be used to destroy SAM sites near the frontline.”

During a SEAD mission, pilots fly into enemy airspace to find and suppress surface-to-air missile systems, radars on the ground. This unique mission set is important because without it all the other aircraft are essentially unprotected from surface-to-air missiles.

In modern warfare SEAD missions can constitute as much as 30% of all sorties launched in the first week of combat and continue at a reduced rate through the rest of a campaign.

R1
Helicopters can certainly perform the SEAD mission given the right terrain, positioning, and avenues of attack; but these numbers are somewhat misleading — SEAD constituting “30% of all sorties” doesn’t mean all those strikes are going to be going against S-300’s. That includes SEAD packages going after AAA and older-generation SAMs as well. And while the Ka-52 can certainly threaten the S-300 with the right tactics and a Kh-25 package, they would be extremely vulnerable and likely lose a lot of aircraft against a prepared defender with supporting MANPADS and SHORAD defenses. If Russia wants to kill Ukrainian S-300’s, they are best off using Flankers or ideally Su-57s.

R2
Yeah, especially given the flat flat terrain in Southern Ukraine. It would be difficult for the alligators (Ka-52) to hide, whereas S-300s are routinely deployed behind earth berms (with S2S missiles in mind). Indeed, Su-57 might have a good shot, but the risk to lose face is also significant. Ukraine does have a serious engineering base in electronics, after all.

R3
Isn’t it somewhat common practice to place SHORAD and/or some MANPADs around the longer range Anti-Air to help negate raids like this?

R4
While the US used attack helicopters to take out some SAM sites in the 1991 Iraq War, this job is normally handled by specialized fighter jet units. I would think the Russians would have done likewise too.


Source https://www.quora.com/q/bjdjvnuigzn...rainian-S-300-with-Ka-52?ch=10&share=6c04043d
 
.
Depends upon how Indian armed forces configure their defenses. They will provide cover to S-400 systems with additional set of defenses such as SPYDER, AKASH and BARAK 8 just in case. An S-400 system can take out helicopters and drones on its own as well. Therefore, not an easy task in our case.

WE need to expand our inventory of cruise missiles of every type on a priority basis.
 
.
Depends upon how Indian armed forces configure their defenses. They will provide cover to S-400 systems with additional set of defenses such as SPYDER, AKASH and BARAK 8 just in case. An S-400 system can take out helicopters and drones on its own as well. Therefore, not an easy task in our case.

WE need to expand our inventory of cruise missiles of every type on a priority basis.
A large group of saboteurs(SSG, disidents, insurgents etc.) is needed, and people in the Indian Military's ranks. but it will take balls of steel.
 
.
Depends upon how Indian armed forces configure their defenses. They will provide cover to S-400 systems with additional set of defenses such as SPYDER, AKASH and BARAK 8 just in case. An S-400 system can take out helicopters and drones on its own as well. Therefore, not an easy task in our case.

WE need to expand our inventory of cruise missiles of every type on a priority basis.
Develop a Missile for that
 
. . .
As discussed only high speed strike aircrafts such for instance J-31s will need to take these missiles depots out. Pakistan should heavily invest in 2 squadron of J-31s in it's air Force for deep inside attacks.
 
.
Depends upon how Indian armed forces configure their defenses. They will provide cover to S-400 systems with additional set of defenses such as SPYDER, AKASH and BARAK 8 just in case. An S-400 system can take out helicopters and drones on its own as well. Therefore, not an easy task in our case.

WE need to expand our inventory of cruise missiles of every type on a priority basis.
Launch an overwhelming barrage of Ra'ad and Babur cruise missiles.
 
.
Launch an overwhelming barrage of Ra'ad and Babur cruise missiles.
We do not have 'many' at present - we do not have a massive budget for 'defense' even though we spare a large sum for it per our situation.

People look at American inventories and mistakenly assume that this might be the norm around the world but far from truth.

Nevertheless, expansion of cruise missile inventory should be TOP PRIORITY in the light of emerging threats in the region. And I believe that we are doing our best in this regard.
 
. .
How to destroy India's S-400 missile depot's

0_12ac08_a136d091_orig-min.jpg

Russia may target Ukrainian S-300 missiles depots using Ka-52.

Russia has already plans to take out S-300 Ukrainian missiles depots as counter measurements. They have specific helicopters designed for these types of offensive. The ka-52 attack helicopters.
The alternative to helicopters is to send swarm of drones equipped with beacon radars homing device zero in on s-400 missiles depots inside Indian territory.
China has supplied Pakistan with specialized drones for this purpose but need to be tested.

Some military experts were pointed out that in the event of active hostilities, Russia might use Ka-52 helicopters to destroy surface-to-air missile (SAM) sites in the South of Ukraine.

Babak Taghvaee, a military analyst based in Malta, claimed in a tweet that at least several consecutive days the 3rd Squadron of the 39th Helicopter Aviation Regiment has practiced Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD) mission using Ka-52 attacks helicopters.

He added: “It means, in case of war with Ukraine, its 16 Ka-52s might be used to destroy SAM sites near the frontline.”

During a SEAD mission, pilots fly into enemy airspace to find and suppress surface-to-air missile systems, radars on the ground. This unique mission set is important because without it all the other aircraft are essentially unprotected from surface-to-air missiles.

In modern warfare SEAD missions can constitute as much as 30% of all sorties launched in the first week of combat and continue at a reduced rate through the rest of a campaign.

R1
Helicopters can certainly perform the SEAD mission given the right terrain, positioning, and avenues of attack; but these numbers are somewhat misleading — SEAD constituting “30% of all sorties” doesn’t mean all those strikes are going to be going against S-300’s. That includes SEAD packages going after AAA and older-generation SAMs as well. And while the Ka-52 can certainly threaten the S-300 with the right tactics and a Kh-25 package, they would be extremely vulnerable and likely lose a lot of aircraft against a prepared defender with supporting MANPADS and SHORAD defenses. If Russia wants to kill Ukrainian S-300’s, they are best off using Flankers or ideally Su-57s.

R2
Yeah, especially given the flat flat terrain in Southern Ukraine. It would be difficult for the alligators (Ka-52) to hide, whereas S-300s are routinely deployed behind earth berms (with S2S missiles in mind). Indeed, Su-57 might have a good shot, but the risk to lose face is also significant. Ukraine does have a serious engineering base in electronics, after all.

R3
Isn’t it somewhat common practice to place SHORAD and/or some MANPADs around the longer range Anti-Air to help negate raids like this?

R4
While the US used attack helicopters to take out some SAM sites in the 1991 Iraq War, this job is normally handled by specialized fighter jet units. I would think the Russians would have done likewise too.


Source https://www.quora.com/q/bjdjvnuigzn...rainian-S-300-with-Ka-52?ch=10&share=6c04043d
I think intelligence and cruise would be the best option as the batteries are supposed to be spread and guarded with rings of different levels.
In case of Russia taking on its own system deployed in some other country they might know any hidden I competency that they can exploit.
 
.
I think intelligence and cruise would be the best option as the batteries are supposed to be spread and guarded with rings of different levels.
In case of Russia taking on its own system deployed in some other country they might know any hidden I competency that they can exploit.
Russia is far ahead of what it has as counter measure for that country. Pakistan needs to develop it's own counter measure from s-400s stationed in India. Last I recall they have x5 Depot missiles batteries numbering in 1250+ anti aircraft missiles. So we need to do homework.

How to destroy,

You need stand of anti-radiation weapons to destroy radars..............SAMs will be useless afterwards.....................

You will need stealth capability to panetrate into enemy air defences.................

For Pakistan, our battle zone will be around 100~150 Kilometers on either side of border in case of war, so stand of weapons shall have a minimum range upto 3 x 150 Kms....................

Enemy will never bring its latest into the range of our stand of weapons, whereas it will use it for safety of key installations.....................

Also we will need a system to protect our air space at least 150 Kilometrs inside enemy border means a No-Fly zone upto 150 Kilometers.......................

Using stealth aircraft from China's J-31 two squadrons should work to counter measure this threat.
 
.
i like to see this thread being discussed with at least 10000 post. bunch of people talking about anything which is not relevant.

only pakistanis can talk about destroying the most advanced air defense system in the world with their anza missiles :lol::lol::lol:

Ya like they discussed how to destroy nuclear submarine then Indians left the hatch open and destroyed it themselves. Pretty ridiculous if you ask me. Just like in Feb when there SAM destroyed their own heli the S-400 will probably end up being wasted on a Tejas or something.
 
.
Components from:
1. PAF 1st Special Operations Squadron
2. PAF No. 10th Special Reconnaissance Flight Squadron
3. PA 7th Commando Battalion' Babrum
4. PA 8th Commando Battalion' al-Azb

A large group of saboteurs(SSG, disidents, insurgents etc.) is needed, and people in the Indian Military's ranks. but it will take balls of steel.
PA SF will keep S-400 on the run throughout the war.
 
.
Send a cheap toy drone with F-16 sticker on it
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom