What's new

How to destroy India's S-400 missiles depots

Ya like they discussed how to destroy nuclear submarine then Indians left the hatch open and destroyed it themselves. Pretty ridiculous if you ask me. Just like in Feb when there SAM destroyed their own heli the S-400 will probably end up being wasted on a Tejas or something.
Yup and later it sank right? pyaaz or aloo kaise hai apke ider? Suna hai petrol se bhi mehenga bik raha hai?
 
i like to see this thread being discussed with at least 10000 post. bunch of people talking about anything which is not relevant.

only pakistanis can talk about destroying the most advanced air defense system in the world with their anza missiles :lol::lol::lol:

most advanced that has never been tested in real life
 
Yup and later it sank right? pyaaz or aloo kaise hai apke ider? Suna hai petrol se bhi mehenga bik raha hai?

The souls of the helicopter servicemen sank to the depths of hell if that's what you're asking. hum ghaas aur gosht khaane ke aadi hain pyaaz aloo toh shahenshaon ki khurak hai.
 
The souls of the helicopter servicemen sank to the depths of hell if that's what you're asking. hum ghaas aur gosht khaane ke aadi hain pyaaz aloo toh shahenshaon ki khurak hai.
Good, dont worry about us, we have millions to replace each soldier we have, but do you have enough resources to fight us for 1000 years? kyuki 70 mein hi fusaddi ban gaye ho....:agree:
 
Good, dont worry about us, we have millions to replace each soldier we have, but do you have enough resources to fight us for 1000 years? kyuki 70 mein hi fusaddi ban gaye ho....:agree:

That's the difference between us. 1 Pakistani soldier life is priceless whereas you just think of them as cannon fodder. It's no wonder your army's morale is so low. You should worry about India things are starting to boil. :enjoy:
 
That's the difference between us. 1 Pakistani soldier life is priceless whereas you just think of them as cannon fodder. It's no wonder your army's morale is so low. You should worry about India things are starting to boil. :enjoy:
no except for Kashmir, the whole of India is enjoying Lok sabha Election and wishing for modi to come back, he has done an excellent job For India, has identified all the loop holes and deficiencies in armed forces and helped them become self sufficient, much like the navy, IAF got dose of reality and is now hell bent to get home grown tejas and MCA, you people have put a match to gun powder that was all wet recently...:toast_sign:
 
no except for Kashmir, the whole of India is enjoying Lok sabha Election and wishing for modi to come back, he has done an excellent job For India, has identified all the loop holes and deficiencies in armed forces and helped them become self sufficient, much like the navy, IAF got dose of reality and is now hell bent to get home grown tejas and MCA, you people have put a match to gun powder that was all wet recently...:toast_sign:

I also support Modi even more than you just look at my signature! But please enough with the Tejas jokes my stomach hurts from laughing. :rofl:
 
How to destroy India's S-400 missile depot's

0_12ac08_a136d091_orig-min.jpg

Russia may target Ukrainian S-300 missiles depots using Ka-52.

Russia has already plans to take out S-300 Ukrainian missiles depots as counter measurements. They have specific helicopters designed for these types of offensive. The ka-52 attack helicopters.
The alternative to helicopters is to send swarm of drones equipped with beacon radars homing device zero in on s-400 missiles depots inside Indian territory.
China has supplied Pakistan with specialized drones for this purpose but need to be tested.

Some military experts were pointed out that in the event of active hostilities, Russia might use Ka-52 helicopters to destroy surface-to-air missile (SAM) sites in the South of Ukraine.

Babak Taghvaee, a military analyst based in Malta, claimed in a tweet that at least several consecutive days the 3rd Squadron of the 39th Helicopter Aviation Regiment has practiced Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD) mission using Ka-52 attacks helicopters.

He added: “It means, in case of war with Ukraine, its 16 Ka-52s might be used to destroy SAM sites near the frontline.”

During a SEAD mission, pilots fly into enemy airspace to find and suppress surface-to-air missile systems, radars on the ground. This unique mission set is important because without it all the other aircraft are essentially unprotected from surface-to-air missiles.

In modern warfare SEAD missions can constitute as much as 30% of all sorties launched in the first week of combat and continue at a reduced rate through the rest of a campaign.

R1
Helicopters can certainly perform the SEAD mission given the right terrain, positioning, and avenues of attack; but these numbers are somewhat misleading — SEAD constituting “30% of all sorties” doesn’t mean all those strikes are going to be going against S-300’s. That includes SEAD packages going after AAA and older-generation SAMs as well. And while the Ka-52 can certainly threaten the S-300 with the right tactics and a Kh-25 package, they would be extremely vulnerable and likely lose a lot of aircraft against a prepared defender with supporting MANPADS and SHORAD defenses. If Russia wants to kill Ukrainian S-300’s, they are best off using Flankers or ideally Su-57s.

R2
Yeah, especially given the flat flat terrain in Southern Ukraine. It would be difficult for the alligators (Ka-52) to hide, whereas S-300s are routinely deployed behind earth berms (with S2S missiles in mind). Indeed, Su-57 might have a good shot, but the risk to lose face is also significant. Ukraine does have a serious engineering base in electronics, after all.

R3
Isn’t it somewhat common practice to place SHORAD and/or some MANPADs around the longer range Anti-Air to help negate raids like this?

R4
While the US used attack helicopters to take out some SAM sites in the 1991 Iraq War, this job is normally handled by specialized fighter jet units. I would think the Russians would have done likewise too.


Source https://www.quora.com/q/bjdjvnuigzn...rainian-S-300-with-Ka-52?ch=10&share=6c04043d

Let us first get and actually deploy this S-400, then we can talk about how to take them out. LOL :lol::lol::lol:
 
I also support Modi even more than you just look at my signature! But please enough with the Tejas jokes my stomach hurts from laughing. :rofl:
Well thats so good!!!! you can help modi by sending money to him...:rofl:
 
Depends upon how Indian armed forces configure their defenses. They will provide cover to S-400 systems with additional set of defenses such as SPYDER, AKASH and BARAK 8 just in case. An S-400 system can take out helicopters and drones on its own as well. Therefore, not an easy task in our case.

WE need to expand our inventory of cruise missiles of every type on a priority basis.
Volleys of cruise missiles to overwhelm the air defenses or wild weasel type of aircrafts to carry out SEAD missions might be the best approaches.
 
Cruise missiles are good because they can fly below the radar coverage in terrain hugging mode
 
As discussed only high speed strike aircrafts such for instance J-31s will need to take these missiles depots out. Pakistan should heavily invest in 2 squadron of J-31s in it's air Force for deep inside attacks.
How much according to you classifies as high speed and what is the high speed to J-31?
 
A large group of saboteurs(SSG, disidents, insurgents etc.) is needed, and people in the Indian Military's ranks. but it will take balls of steel.

Destroying airports and such strategic assets would be more possible if a team of SSGs was carrying shoulder launch weapons that could reach 10-15 KM and are of mass destructive nature.
 
Back
Top Bottom