What's new

HIMARS defeat S-400 system

LeGenD

MODERATOR
Joined
Aug 28, 2006
Messages
15,813
Reaction score
162
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Ukraine has used HIMARS to defeat S-400 system components on different occasions in the war.

1st event:



----

2nd event:





----

3rd event:




@Abid123
@Mehdipersian
@925boy
@aziqbal
@Hassan Al-Somal
@_NOBODY_
@Deino
@That Guy
@PanzerKiel
@jhungary
@gambit
 
It show nato have good information about war.

They can find s400 location and then order to HIMARS to attack.

Anti ballistic missile defense is hard and It has a low success rate, Nothing is new.
 
It show nato have good information about war.

They can find s400 location and then order to HIMARS to attack.

Anti ballistic missile defense is hard and It has a low success rate, Nothing is new.

The US has excellent reconnaissance satellites. Russia is only just catching up in this field with the launching of many Kondor satellites.
 
HIMARS is not an anti radiation missile system. The location of S-400 batteries and its components is provided by American military satellites.

No ABM system in the world is perfect, they can be overwhelmed easily.

Recently Americans provided Ukrainians with cluster munitions and French have promised to give Ukrainians long range missiles. Even Americans are negotiating to provide Ukraine with longer range cruise and ballistic missiles.

There will be no solution for Russians left to keep their achievements in Ukraine intact, unless they immediately occupy 3 Baltic states and bomb NATO supply lines from there. It is true that the 3 Baltics are NATO memebrs, it is when the push comes to shove.
 
Ukraine has used HIMARS to defeat S-400 system components on different occasions in the war.

1st event:


----

2nd event:



----

3rd event:



@Abid123
@Mehdipersian
@925boy
@aziqbal
@Hassan Al-Somal
@_NOBODY_
@Deino
@That Guy
@PanzerKiel
@jhungary
@gambit
My two cents:
Problem with defence systems is that they have to detect & engage their target without being detected.Once ADS is detected,a capable adversary can take it out with precision strike.
 
HIMARS is not an anti radiation missile system. The location of S-400 batteries and its components is provided by American military satellites.

No ABM system in the world is perfect, they can be overwhelmed easily.

Recently Americans provided Ukrainians with cluster munitions and French have promised to give Ukrainians long range missiles. Even Americans are negotiating to provide Ukraine with longer range cruise and ballistic missiles.

There will be no solution for Russians left to keep their achievements in Ukraine intact, unless they immediately occupy 3 Baltic states and bomb NATO supply lines from there. It is true that the 3 Baltics are NATO memebrs, it is when the push comes to shove.

Russia is willing to sacrifice millions of men to fight Ukrainians. In the Great Patriotic War millions of Russian men were killed.
 
Now this incident tells us about importance of developing Fatah-2 Guided MLRS and supporting surveillance assets like

With twice the range of HiMARS.

250km range is enough to push S-400 away from border for creating safe space for PAF to operate.



One thing more:

S-136s Massive use by Russians indicate that UAVs/loitering munitions are useful but not really decisive in battle field unless fully coordinated with other war assets.
 
I still don’t understand why turkey sacrificed so much for this piece of crap(imho) and why India puts so much faith in it either…
The technology, and that's about it. The S-400 is a good system, despite the selective footage. It's just meant for dealing with systems like HIMARS.
 
I read these pro Ukrainian news with a bucket of salt.
No independent way of verification.
They have attached clear pics with it.
Do you think Russians will openly admit that their system was destroyed in Ukraine and failed to intercept cheap rockets with 100% success ?
This will significantly decrease the exports of S-400 if they admit it publicly.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom