What's new

Neptune Subsonic Cruise Missiles hit S-400 ADS

S.Arabia has great Radar network

Problem is pathetic PATRIOT which focused the military’s planning to intercept high flying Ballistic Missiles and Fighter Jets


low flying cruise missiles and kamikaze drones have small radar signatures and can fly close to the ground, sharply reducing the detection range

They also are easy to maneuver, allowing them to hit the coverage gaps between Radars and PATRIOT batteries.


That’s why short-range defenses such as Turkish KORKUT , SUNGUR , GURZ , HISAR-A that protect against targets within visual range are so important





YES
16 TOR-M1s are everywhere in your fantasy world

16 TOR-M1s are in Crete to protect S300s and Air Bases




Your VELOS is also useless against Turkish IHA-230 air launched supersonic Ballistic Missiles
and ATACMS , YILDIRIM , BORA , TAYFUN Ballistic Missiles

RIM-7M can not intercept Ballistic Missiles
Here:

As the above threat list indicates, the September 14 attack came at a time when Saudi missile defenses were overstretched. Apparently, the combined drone/cruise missile strike entered the kingdom from the north near the border with Iraq and Kuwait, which blindsided air defenses protecting the targeted areas because most of them face east and do not have 360-degree coverage. This path, combined with the low-altitude capabilities of the weapons involved, exploited holes in the IADS caused by scarcity of radar systems and physical limitations like the curvature of the earth.

Iran has had decades to observe Saudi air defenses and likely recognized all of these vulnerabilities. The May 14 attack launched from Iraq may have been intended to test these same weaknesses.

Another problem is the Saudi system’s failure to react when anecdotal information from social media and local reports hinted that an attack was coming. An ASV network does not have to rely solely on radars and related technology—for example, Saddam’s Iraq developed a capable network of visual observers and acoustic stations to report the sounds of incoming cruise missiles. Yet the Saudi IADS failed to incorporate readily available information in this case, reflecting a lack of training in the northern air defenses. In contrast, more experienced personnel on the Yemen front have become adept at using visual observers to help direct radars to the right vector on narrow-beam mode, giving them the sensitivity needed to spot small targets.

Even if a proper warning had been issued, intercepting the attack would have been both difficult and risky with Saudi Arabia’s current systems. Its older Skyguard radar-controlled antiaircraft guns and Shahine short-range surface-to-air missiles were designed to counter aircraft and would struggle to intercept smaller and slower cruise missiles and drones. Using these defense systems in built-up areas or civilian airspace would also raise concerns about collateral damage and misidentification. To minimize these risks while successfully engaging the attack in the two to three minutes between detection and impact, local personnel would need to take bold, precise action with little room for miscalculation.


 
.
All day I hear:

"Skyros,Skyros,Patriot...so pathetic".

Meanwhile,you refuse to answer if you have cognitive problems or suffer from Autism or AHDH.

Reality hurts Daydreamers like You
maybe you have cognitive problems or suffer from Autism or AHDH to deny reality

I am talking about possibe war scenario between Greece and Turkiye

and if we destroyed PATRIOTs in Skyros ... GAME OVER
Greek Islands will be defenceless against the Turkish Armed Forces

We dont need Athens
to take Islands will be enough which are 3-10-30 km away from Turkish mainland


btw today Azerbaijan has started destroying Armenian military targets in Karabakh
We will see what about Indian , Iranian daydreamers on PDF
 
.
S-400 forms one level of India's multi-tiered missile defense system, which also includes Barak-8, Akash-NG/Prime, QR-SAM, Spyder
View attachment 953740
View attachment 953741
View attachment 953742
View attachment 953743
View attachment 953744
View attachment 953745
Layered BMD interceptors of India –
(1) AD1 interceptor
View attachment 953749

(2)Advanced Air Defence Interceptor
View attachment 953746
View attachment 953747
(2)PDV Mk 2 InterceptorView attachment 953748
Battle tested for shooting their own aircraft’s🤣
 
. .
Reality hurts Daydreamers like You
maybe you have cognitive problems or suffer from Autism or AHDH to deny reality

I am talking about possibe war scenario between Greece and Turkiye

and if we destroyed PATRIOTs in Skyros ... GAME OVER
Greek Islands will be defenceless against the Turkish Armed Forces

We dont need Athens
to take Islands will be enough which are 3-10-30 km away from Turkish mainland


btw today Azerbaijan has started destroying Armenian military targets in Karabakh
We will see what about Indian , Iranian daydreamers on PDF
How come you're obsessed with Skyros,I've no idea. I showed you earlier on the map,that most islands close to Turkey are not guarded by the Patriot systems in Skyros. Do you have selective memory?

greek%20air%20cover.jpg


greeksamnetworka.jpg
 
.
Turkish SOM , CAKIR , KEMANKES and ATMACA have super sea skimming and terrain hugging capabilities ( below 5 m ) to attack on both land and see targets


20 m over water against see targets
KALIBR fly altitude of 50-150 m , not low flying capability




No any chance against Turkish KORKUT , SUNGUR , GURZ , HISAR-A AD Systems

So easy to intercept Shaded-136 with max speed of 185 km/h
and without RF seeker or E/O Camera for point accuracy


Russia used Shaded-136s to create chaos in populated areas


on the other hand ,
Turkish SIMSEK has max speed of 850 km/h and with E/O Camera
Turkish KEMANKES has max speed of 720 km/h and with E/O Camera

conducts all line-of-sight communications over the mian unmanned platform it is attached to. Accordingly, it can transmit telemetry data and video to the ground control station through the attached main platform.
Turkish companies have not claimed 5 m cruise altitude but you.



You have overlooked what I have disclosed about Kalibr cruise missile in post # 117. You need to understand how cruise missiles work instead of making unrealistic claims.

You have not checked RUSI report, right? Shahed-136 is a precision strike munition. Russia has used this drone to attack different types of targets in Ukraine.

Both Kalibr cruise missiles and Shahed-136 drones are low flying standoff munitions as per global standards.

Maybe not as per unrealistic naysayer standards.
 
. .

#ucking, that is a lot of research spanning over 60 years that every one knows but none of the kills were due to a super duper, game changer 6 layer air defense system that I was referring to. Idiots will be idiots.

PAF shot down jets from India (since 1959), USSR, Afghanistan and Israel. You can add Iran and US if you count UAVs. Indians have only shot down Pakistan jets and in war and peace the ratio has always in favor of Pakistan even in 71.

Our museums are full of Indian planes, where the Indian pilots surrendered without firing a bullet.

1959 Canberra
1964 Ouragan
1965 Gnat (Forget about the war losses which were in favor of Pakistan)
1971 more IAF losses compared to PAF
kargil: MiG 21, MiG 27, Canberra, Mi8
Post Balakot: MiG 21, Su 33, Mi17.

Now go drink some muter and take a cow gober bath and go to sleep.
 
Last edited:
. .
Unverified, and most likely false.
So how come we have the flight suit of the Israeli pilot in the PAF Museum? You can go there take a picture and compare it with Israeli flight suits from that period. Pakistani tailors cannot fake something they have never seen. Plus the name of the pilot is known and was accepted by the Israelis. Stop being in denial, we shot two of your jets with no losses and we were flying Soviet Migs maintained by the Syrians with hardly any air defense controllers.
 
Last edited:
.
Turkish companies have not claimed 5 m cruise altitude but you.

ROKETSAN official Website doesnt give that information for ATMACA Missile too about super sea skimming and terrain hugging capabilities ( below 5 m ) to attack on both land and see targets



but you can see super low flying capability below 5 m .... even below 3 m to hit target with pinpoint accuracy
1695172256279.png

Another test fire for super sea skimming below 5 m
1695172526961.png

And ATMACA hit the target with super sea skimming capability below 3 m
1695172011537.png


You have overlooked what I have disclosed about Kalibr cruise missile in post # 117. You need to understand how cruise missiles work instead of making unrealistic claims.

Better you need to learn what about great Turkish Defense Industry

I showed the reality about super low flying capability below 5 m


ATMACA Missile will have dual seeker IIR+RF for very high hit sensitivity

INS + GPS + TRN + Barometric Altimeter + Radar Altimeter + dual seeker IIR+RF


SOM Cruise Missile has also super low flying capability below 5 m and superior guidance

INS + GPS + TRN + ATR + IBN with IIR seeker

Inertial Navigation System
Global Positioning System
Terrain Referenced Navigation
Automatic Target Recognition
Image-Based Navigation


Russian KALIBR Cruise Missile only can dream about these capabilities
 
Last edited:
.
ROKETSAN official Website doesnt give that information for ATMACA Missile too about super sea skimming and terrain hugging capabilities ( below 5 m ) to attack on both land and see targets



but you can see super low flying capability below 5 m .... even below 3 m to hit target with point accuracy
View attachment 954730
Another test fire for super sea skimming below 5 m
View attachment 954731
And ATMACA hit the target with super see skimming capability below 3 m
View attachment 954729



Better you need to learn what about great Turkish Defense Industry

I showed the reality about super low flying capability below 5 m


ATMACA Missile will have dual seeker IIR+RF for very high hit sensitivity

INS + GPS + TRN + Barometric Altimeter + Radar Altimeter + dual seeker IIR+RF


SOM Cruise Missile has also super low flying capability below 5 m and superior guidance

INS + GPS + TRN + ATR + IBN with IIR seeker

Inertial Navigation System
Global Positioning System
Terrain Referenced Navigation
Automatic Target Recognition
Image-Based Navigation


Russian KALIBR Cruise Missile only can dream about these capabilities

Different-and-possible-scenarios-hitting-targets-by-cruise-missiles.png


You are showing me pictures of cruise missile(s) at the stage of descent to engage a target above water (direct hit).

3M54K will do the same as well:

A submarine-launched anti-shipping variant deployed by the Russian Navy. Its length is 8.22 m (27.0 ft), with a 200 kg (440 lb) warhead. Its range is 440–660 km (270–410 mi). It is a Sea-skimmer with a final stage flight altitude of 4.6 metres (15 ft) and a supersonic terminal speed of Mach 2.9 (3,550 km/h; 2,210 mph).


A cruise missile can operate at a very low altitude above water in stable weather conditions, but this flight mode is unsafe on land due to presence of numerous obstacles on the surface that should be avoided. A cruise missile should continue to adjust its altitude on land to reach its target safely.
 
.
A cruise missile can operate at a very low altitude above water in stable weather conditions, but this flight mode is unsafe on land due to presence of numerous obstacles on the surface that should be avoided. A cruise missile should continue to adjust its altitude on land to reach its target safely.

SOM Missile has Terrain Referenced Navigation and Image-Based Navigation with IIR seeker to fly closer to obstacles and at generally lower altitudes, making it harder to detect by ground Radars . ( below 5 m, if needed )


ATMACA Missile has also Terrain Referenced Navigation , IIR seeker , Barometric Altimeter + Radar Altimeter which measures altitude above the terrain beneath
 
.
SOM Missile has Terrain Referenced Navigation and Image-Based Navigation with IIR seeker to fly closer to obstacles and at generally lower altitudes, making it harder to detect by ground Radars . ( below 5 m, if needed )


ATMACA Missile has also Terrain Referenced Navigation , IIR seeker , Barometric Altimeter + Radar Altimeter which measures altitude above the terrain beneath
Most cruise missiles have same capabilities you're adding nothing new
 
.
Most cruise missiles have same capabilities you're adding nothing new

Russian KALIBR Missile doesnt have image-based midcourse navigation by taking snapshots of waypoints and comparing them against predicted position to update the navigation system

if GPS capability is blocked , SOM missile can follow its waypoints using infrared based terrain updates


With superior guidance capabilities , We can put the SOM and ATMACA Missiles through your bedroom window ... for very high hit sensitivity
 
.
Back
Top Bottom