57 refugees pushed back to Burma by BGB. WHYYYYY ??

[Major d1]

Today 57 refugees pushed back to Burma by BGB.

We wanna ask to BGB why BGB doesn't make a lay the blame on to Myanmar ? This is our national Defence distress too. Why they want to enter? For food? NO. They want to pierce only for safety reason. They want to get respite from Myanmar Fox Army and extremist Buddhist.


They are our Brothers, sisters, mothers, our kids. If we don't help them, then who will help them? Hundreds of Rohingya Muslims are fleeing a military crackdown in everyday. In 1971 why Bangladeshi people went to Indian border area? Isn't it is the equal folder?


Bangladesh Army don't stop thinking about that- Your identity is you are muslim army at first. They are slaughtering your brothers and sisters- But why you are soundless? For your Foreign policy? For your Govt. policy? Why you don’t you throw out this dirty policy and get back to your own identity?


Now if they take arms- should we call them Islamic terrorist? But world will say that.


Kashmir, Palestine, Mayanmar now in the same row.

@war&peace @Doordie @GreenFalcon @BDforever @~Phoenix~

 

[Avisheik]

Well the issue is quite complex and the solution has to be creative.

Firstly bangladesh had no problem taking in refugees for a brief period of time. As you probably know bangladesh had taken lots of rohingya refugees before(250 000 in 1992) and this was not a one of thing we have taken refugees year after year. However, the main problem is that Myanmar using this opportunity to label them as illegal bangladeshis, even though they have been there since the start of the british rule. They are using this label to continue to push them into bangladesh territory. Myanmar systematically is causing violence and suppression of human rights(the right to marry, forced labor, etc). This is turn is helping myanmar achieve its primary objective, getting rid of rohingyas from their land. Accepting the refugees will only fuel myanmars bid to clear the land from rohingyas. A vast majority of rohingya refugees will never return to myanmar.

Secondly, in this world, unilateral military action is preposterous. I know you may feel very strongly about this issue. But a military solution is out of the question. We do not have the military strength to sustain and operate in a foreign country, we simply do not have the logistics for it. Furthermore, military action will result in a large number of casualties with very few gains for bangladesh in both the short and long term.

Thirdly, the only way of dealing with myanmar right now is economic sanctions or by carrot and stick, in order to change their policy against rohingyas. Bangladesh has literally no power here. We will need help from the larger international community in order to make this successful. This is because bangladesh does not have much investments or businesses in myanmar, so we our economic sanctions or other threats wont work. However, larger economies which has more interconnections with the burmese economy can cause a change in myanmar policy against the rohingyas.

 

[Kandari-Hushiyaar]

Well the issue is quite complex and the solution has to be creative.

Firstly bangladesh had no problem taking in refugees for a brief period of time. As you probably know bangladesh had taken lots of rohingya refugees before(250 000 in 1992) and this was not a one of thing we have taken refugees year after year. However, the main problem is that Myanmar using this opportunity to label them as illegal bangladeshis, even though they have been there since the start of the british rule. They are using this label to continue to push them into bangladesh territory. Myanmar systematically is causing violence and suppression of human rights(the right to marry, forced labor, etc). This is turn is helping myanmar achieve its primary objective, getting rid of rohingyas from their land. Accepting the refugees will only fuel myanmars bid to clear the land from rohingyas. A vast majority of rohingya refugees will never return to myanmar.

Secondly, in this world, unilateral military action is preposterous. I know you may feel very strongly about this issue. But a military solution is out of the question. We do not have the military strength to sustain and operate in a foreign country, we simply do not have the logistics for it. Furthermore, military action will result in a large number of casualties with very few gains for bangladesh in both the short and long term.

Thirdly, the only way of dealing with myanmar right now is economic sanctions or by carrot and stick, in order to change their policy against rohingyas. Bangladesh has literally no power here. We will need help from the larger international community in order to make this successful. This is because bangladesh does not have much investments or businesses in myanmar, so we our economic sanctions or other threats wont work. However, larger economies which has more interconnections with the burmese economy can cause a change in myanmar policy against the rohingyas.

This guy explained everything meticulously. Get it into your head @Major d1 . Bangladesh can take all the refugees if Countries like Lebanon or Jordan can. However, then this will be a triumph for Myanmar because Sending All muslims to Bangladesh is their prime objective. And No one is as shrewd as Sheikh Hasina.

Instead Campaign against Silent Wealthy Muslim Countries . Tell them to ask their western allies to put economic sanctions on Myanmar.

The western world doesnt want to antagonize Myanmar to keep it away from China. This is the only reason Myanmar is killing without any penalty.

 

[Major d1]

Well the issue is quite complex and the solution has to be creative.

Firstly bangladesh had no problem taking in refugees for a brief period of time. As you probably know bangladesh had taken lots of rohingya refugees before(250 000 in 1992) and this was not a one of thing we have taken refugees year after year. However, the main problem is that Myanmar using this opportunity to label them as illegal bangladeshis, even though they have been there since the start of the british rule. They are using this label to continue to push them into bangladesh territory. Myanmar systematically is causing violence and suppression of human rights(the right to marry, forced labor, etc). This is turn is helping myanmar achieve its primary objective, getting rid of rohingyas from their land. Accepting the refugees will only fuel myanmars bid to clear the land from rohingyas. A vast majority of rohingya refugees will never return to myanmar.

Secondly, in this world, unilateral military action is preposterous. I know you may feel very strongly about this issue. But a military solution is out of the question. We do not have the military strength to sustain and operate in a foreign country, we simply do not have the logistics for it. Furthermore, military action will result in a large number of casualties with very few gains for bangladesh in both the short and long term.

Thirdly, the only way of dealing with myanmar right now is economic sanctions or by carrot and stick, in order to change their policy against rohingyas. Bangladesh has literally no power here. We will need help from the larger international community in order to make this successful. This is because bangladesh does not have much investments or businesses in myanmar, so we our economic sanctions or other threats wont work. However, larger economies which has more interconnections with the burmese economy can cause a change in myanmar policy against the rohingyas.

Brother.

Many Rohiga staying in bangladesh for their security purpose only. Illegally came from mayanmar we know that . The question was WHY ? Arakan belongs to the rohiga muslims, Myanamar may be have no wish to give it back to their own land to their own people. It is clear. Now where they will go . Indonesia or other muslim countries also sleeping. Why ? Also shut up in this case. As a minority purpose , those who are killing everyday, we can't let it happen as a human being or not as a neighbor state formula.

But in the military purpose i have huge faith on my defence system. We have no strength to sustain with any foreign countries in the long term or short terms basis with logistic support it depends on the operational movement. If military goes for the action , weaponry nutter thugs will come automatically, it is war rules. Somehow logistic power will come with hugely. . Even we have huge men power too . What is dangerous for India. according to ICG. That is why India don't want to attack BD. And still now afraid of BD. However in the same purpose they didn't do it in 1975. But it will not happen, Bcz we have coward govt. And military also sleeping. I know in these time it is quiet tough question why . But no it is not impossible at all to fought back. The main problem is our foreign policy is. Bangladesh Army can win over the mayanmar or India. Strategically . It is huge discussion. If BD army don't want to conquer mayanmar but they can loudly ask to mayanmar , STOP DOING THIS> OR WE ARE HERE. They can break the door of Myanmar if bd govt. wants to. But as i said we have a stupid govt. ruthless govt. system. Who don't not know how to care their own people. They will care others?

Dealing with trade deal, this prob will not be solved. And we don't hope any humanity to rohigas from the international forum too. Yes UN will say . Stop it , but by the back door US will say do it for treating India. Economically intentionally, mayanmar will not change their policy to the rohiga people. They will do their job as they are doing . This is their political problem not economical. And politically their govt. using force to the the muslims of mayanmar. In the large community , we wanted to settled the issue, what happened? Nothing.

At last want to say , we who who we are . Our system is barricade for us, otherwise already we freed our rohiga muslims and could have been gave arakan to them.

This guy explained everything meticulously. Get it into your head @Major d1 . Bangladesh can take all the refugees if Countries like Lebanon or Jordan can. However, then this will be a triumph for Myanmar because Sending All muslims to Bangladesh is their prime objective. And No one is as shrewd as Sheikh Hasina.

Instead Campaign against Silent Wealthy Muslim Countries . Tell them to ask their western allies to put economic sanctions on Myanmar.

The western world doesnt want to antagonize Myanmar to keep it away from China. This is the only reason Myanmar is killing without any penalty.

You are living under western slavery system. What hasina did , personally i feel shame for that . . As a PM of a state this policy she took for the refugees? Also want to give them back those who are living in bd. This is nonsese. their prime objec is killing all the muslims of rohiga brother. BCz there are huge asset , such as oil, gas etce is under Arakan land. They want to capture the land.

Putting Economical sanctions on Myanmar is not the solution of this problem. It is their political problem , where US is supporting then by the back door. Do u want to tell me we have to ask UN or WORLD BANK or etce western countries to stop treading with mayanmar ? And they will do it? By the way- what the hell 57 muslim countries is doing ? Their one united voice was enough for mayanmar . Another solution is military aggression towards mayanmar for saving our own brother and sisters.

Make a similarity with - What zions are doing to our Palestinian brothers or sisters ?Hope then, it will be clear to you .

 

[Mage]

Bangladesh Army can win over the Myanmar or India.

Courage is good but blind courage gets you nowhere. I'd reckon that our military might be evenly matched with Myanmar, against India our troops are outnumbered and outgunned. And I'm not even counting their nukes.

If BD army don't want to conquer mayanmar but they can loudly ask to mayanmar , STOP DOING THIS> OR WE ARE HERE.

Myanmar govt would tell our's to mind our own business. And with a war being out of question, a step like this will only make our govt and military a laughing stock.

By the way- what the hell 57 muslim countries is doing ? Their one united voice was enough for mayanmar .

They have no united voice.

Another solution is military aggression towards mayanmar for saving our own brother and sisters.

Terrible solution. A war would do more damage than good. Also in a war much more Rohyngas will die than now.

 

[Cyberian]

Bangladesh is cruel. Watches so heartlessly the Genocide of Muslim Rohingya.

Such a selfish and heartless people. Still plenty of Hindu blood running in their veins.

 

[Russell]

Bangladesh is cruel. Watches so heartlessly the Genocide of Muslim Rohingya.

Such a selfish and heartless people. Still plenty of Hindu blood running in their veins.

Of course the loving Pious Muslims of Pakistan would know all about GENOCIDE. Why don't you use your mighty Islamic Air Force to go in and save the rohingya? Every second thread in this forum is about the mighty Islamic Army of mighty Pakistan....so, what are you waiting for?

Or is it that while we have Hindu blood running in our veins - your blood is worse - that of cowards. Mighty 'martial race' cowards who got their asses handed to them by a bunch of hindus and lungi wearing brown midgets.

 

[Major d1]

Courage is good but blind courage gets you nowhere. I'd reckon that our military might be evenly matched with Myanmar, against India our troops are outnumbered and outgunned. And I'm not even counting their nukes.


Myanmar govt would tell our's to mind our own business. And with a war being out of question, a step like this will only make our govt and military a laughing stock.


They have no united voice.


Terrible solution. A war would do more damage than good. Also in a war much more Rohyngas will die than now.

1- YOu have no worry abt their NUKS. bcz No country will use Nuks ever. If u have 8 months fuel to do a war. It means ur self-independent. Refueling is an another chapter.
2-It is not a diplomatic conversation. We may say this is threat . So laughing to us is out of question.
3- We are not united bcz we are following western slavery democratic nationalism concept.

 

[Mage]

1- YOu have no worry abt their NUKS. bcz No country will use Nuks ever. If u have 8 months fuel to do a war. It means ur self-independent. Refueling is an another chapter.

USA used nukes in WW2. And no 8 months mean nothing. Otherwise Palestine wouldn't be in such a condition now.
That being said, I doubt India would be using nukes in a war against Bangladesh. Not because they are afraid of using them but because they probably won't need to use them.

2-It is not a diplomatic conversation. We may say this is threat . So laughing to us is out of question.

No we cannot make them change their policy by simply threatening them. We are no USA or China. Moreover it will harm our reputation in the international community.

3- We are not united bcz we are following western slavery democratic nationalism concept.

Really? Were we united before we started following slavery democratic system? Then why did Timur attacked Delhi Sultanate in 14th century? Where was the unity?

 

[Nabil365]

Today 57 refugees pushed back to Burma by BGB.

We wanna ask to BGB why BGB doesn't make a lay the blame on to Myanmar ? This is our national Defence distress too. Why they want to enter? For food? NO. They want to pierce only for safety reason. They want to get respite from Myanmar Fox Army and extremist Buddhist.


They are our Brothers, sisters, mothers, our kids. If we don't help them, then who will help them? Hundreds of Rohingya Muslims are fleeing a military crackdown in everyday. In 1971 why Bangladeshi people went to Indian border area? Isn't it is the equal folder?


Bangladesh Army don't stop thinking about that- Your identity is you are muslim army at first. They are slaughtering your brothers and sisters- But why you are soundless? For your Foreign policy? For your Govt. policy? Why you don’t you throw out this dirty policy and get back to your own identity?


Now if they take arms- should we call them Islamic terrorist? But world will say that.


Kashmir, Palestine, Mayanmar now in the same row.

@war&peace @Doordie @GreenFalcon @BDforever @~Phoenix~

Why should we?

 

[Milica]

Because BD may be have some space left under its butthole to accommodate refugees from other countries with no guarantee to return. Please stop producing like mad dogs specially if you have no quality. I see swarming Rohingyas pouring into BD without any hassle

https://twitter.com/x/status/800977121594195968

https://twitter.com/x/status/800975372770648064

https://twitter.com/x/status/800453247593054208

 

[Major d1]

USA used nukes in WW2. And no 8 months mean nothing. Otherwise Palestine wouldn't be in such a condition now.
That being said, I doubt India would be using nukes in a war against Bangladesh. Not because they are afraid of using them but because they probably won't need to use them.



No we cannot make them change their policy by simply threatening them. We are no USA or China. Moreover it will harm our reputation in the international community.




Really? Were we united before we started following slavery democratic system? Then why did Timur attacked Delhi Sultanate in 14th century? Where was the unity?

1- As i said before no country in this world use NUK . Bcz after ww2 , it has been closed. Bcz before NUK power there are many thugs have what is more dangerous then NUK> India will never think about NUK using in bd. bcz , it is their threat too.

2- We have that power , that we can threat them. NAf war is a good example. Mayanmar is a state who just afraid of Threatening . Bcz British rules policy was same as same what was for this bangal. In this region we are asset for USA and China. and for India too. We should use our power.

3- Timur attacked not Delhi, He attacked a providence, bcz that time Hidu kings stared torture to their own people. So normal people, i men hindus went to Timur and ask for help. That is why he attacked that providence. In that time there was no state name as delhi. This is long story .

Yes when we are following capitalism and democracy by the concept of nationalism concept from that time we were separated into 57 states. in 1924 when khilafah broken. Scnc then we are separated. By calling u r bangladeshi , he is pakistani , when our actual identity is we are muslim at first . By the way Nationalism concept also haram is islam. where we have no khilafah state so who will united us?

Why should we?

Why we shouldn't ?

 

[Nabil365]

Why we shouldn't ?

Burden on our economy and none of our business.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

I just hope they don't end up in India for some reason or another. We have burnt our fingers before by doing that.

 

[asad71]

Burden on our economy and none of our business.

Exactly this sort of passivity has allowed India to rob us of our sovereignty.