What's new

3 of 4 Mossad spies killed in shootout east of Tehran on Mostafa Khomeini Blvd, Damavand

150 Yankee soldiers got injured in return.

FIRST SINCE WW2 !

Many explosions and conflagrations shook bibi's arse yesterday and cyber attacked almost destroyed israel.

Also Hezbollah kicked your arse in 2000 & 2006, Not to mention hamas, and Iranian missile attack on Jolan.

Ayatollah Khamenei said if the zions do anything wrong Iran will raze tel aviv and haifa to the ground.

After time of peace of imam hassan, time of war of imam hussain will come and it will wipe jews out of Middle east.

my man coping

you guys fired missiles at cement lol

While reporting to your own people that 70 Americans were killed, when in fact no one even scratched a finger, damn coping so hard
 
.
my man coping

you guys fired missiles at cement lol

While reporting to your own people that 70 Americans were killed, when in fact no one even scratched a finger, damn coping so hard

That report didn't originate from Iran but from local Iraqi sources. Even western news broadcasters cited it in the initial hours after the attack (heard one myself). Furthermore several mysterious "accidental" deaths of G.I.'s stationed abroad were reported shortly after the strike by the US regime, known for its lies and cover ups.

Last but not least, Russian sources indicated that senior CIA operative Mike D'Andrea was on board the US air force surveillance plane that crashed in Afghanistan in late January and was likely shot down. The US regime didn't deny the report, whilst it is usually quick to do so.
 
.
That report didn't originate from Iran but from local Iraqi sources. Even western news broadcasters cited it in the initial hours after the attack (heard one myself). Furthermore several mysterious "accidental" deaths of G.I.'s stationed abroad were reported shortly after the strike by the US regime, known for its lies and cover ups.

Last but not least, Russian sources indicated that senior CIA operative Mike D'Andrea was on board the US air force surveillance plane that crashed in Afghanistan in late January and was likely shot down. The US regime didn't deny the report, whilst it is usually quick to do so.

The downing of the E-11A aircraft still remains one of the most elusive military related events pertaining to Iran in recent memory... It's almost as if the entire incident has been brushed under the rug, same as with the USN multi-BILLION dollar carrier that was officially scuttled a couple days ago. These sorts of losses can't go unnoticed in the grander-scheme of things although I can't say how much of a hand, if at all, Iran had in the fire that destroyed the carrier, reports indicate that the fire did not originate in the fuel storage area and that it started somewhere else on the ship but the vessel itself is goner. They're going to go through the process of removing any important hardware in order to salvage whatever it is they can.

Further more, even if "Mike D'Andrea" wasn't on it or does't exist, that plane is only 1 of 4 if I'm not mistaken (very expensive too), and represents quite the loss to USAF capabilities in the region for some time until a replacement is brought in (granted I don't know what the status on that is).
 
Last edited:
.
That report didn't originate from Iran but from local Iraqi sources. Even western news broadcasters cited it in the initial hours after the attack (heard one myself). Furthermore several mysterious "accidental" deaths of G.I.'s stationed abroad were reported shortly after the strike by the US regime, known for its lies and cover ups.

Last but not least, Russian sources indicated that senior CIA operative Mike D'Andrea was on board the US air force surveillance plane that crashed in Afghanistan in late January and was likely shot down. The US regime didn't deny the report, whilst it is usually quick to do so.
You're all coping

The US didn't suffer anything

All Iran did was fire missiles at cement, shoot down an Ukranian airliner with a bunch of Iranians and claim victory
 
.
@Beny Karachun ...in your view what will be the Israeli strategy when eventually ( let's say next 25 years) The major Muslim nations of middle east such as Iran, Turkey, Egypt will eventually develop the bomb and other less capable actors such as Saudi/UAE will buy them. Considering that Pakistan already has the bomb then Israel will be surrounded with all these nations that may or may not be very friendly to Israel.?? What is the long term view from your side of the pond.
 
.
@Beny Karachun ...in your view what will be the Israeli strategy when eventually ( let's say next 25 years) The major Muslim nations of middle east such as Iran, Turkey, Egypt will eventually develop the bomb and other less capable actors such as Saudi/UAE will buy them. Considering that Pakistan already has the bomb then Israel will be surrounded with all these nations that may or may not be very friendly to Israel.?? What is the long term view from your side of the pond.
You would have asked the same question if we were 30 years ago. And up until now no nation that had any hostile intent against Israel, within Israel's range, has gotten a nuclear weapon.

They won't build a nuclear weapon, they're signed on on the NPT. Israel will act upon any nation with hostile intent in case it happens like it did against Syria and like it did against Iraq, or maybe in other ways, like sabotage. Also, Saudi Arabia and UAE are more capable than Egypt of creating a nuclear bomb, scientifically they're actually quite impressive.
 
.
You would have asked the same question if we were 30 years ago. And up until now no nation that had any hostile intent against Israel, within Israel's range, has gotten a nuclear weapon.

They won't build a nuclear weapon, they're signed on on the NPT. Israel will act upon any nation with hostile intent in case it happens like it did against Syria and like it did against Iraq, or maybe in other ways, like sabotage. Also, Saudi Arabia and UAE are more capable than Egypt of creating a nuclear bomb, scientifically they're actually quite impressive.
ok..let me interpret "Israel will act upon" ..does it mean Israel will attack all these nation directly or through US.. I think you mean directly...in that case Israel will be in constant war with several major non-arab and arab nations in her neighbourhood...is that realistic!!.These are very capable major heavy weights ..so can you elaborate.
 
.
ok..let me interpret "Israel will act upon" ..does it mean Israel will attack all these nation directly or through US.. I think you mean directly...in that case Israel will be in constant war with several major non-arab and arab nations in her neighbourhood...is that realistic!!.These are very capable major heavy weights ..so can you elaborate.
I am telling this from my opinion, as I am not some government executive.

First of all, I don't think any of these nations will feel a need to develop a nuclear weapon.

Second of all, even if they will try to develop a nuclear bomb, they won't develop it all at once, so any potential war wouldn't be against everyone. And that war and its results would show any other nation with plans to build a nuclear bomb that Israel will not accept such a reality, and they will have to think very carefully if having a nuclear bomb is worth a war with Israel, that might prevent any other nation from creating a nuclear program altogether.

Third of all, it is not only Israel's interest to keep those nations nuclear weapons free due to instability in those nations, but also the interest of the US and Europe. So a coalition against such countries is more than possible and even likely. Also a reason why they might not want to pursue such a program.

Talking about the far future is pointless, as I don't know what technologies would exist, maybe Israel would posses such a robust air defense system that it wouldn't care about any nuclear weapons, who knows?
 
.
I am telling this from my opinion, as I am not some government executive.

First of all, I don't think any of these nations will feel a need to develop a nuclear weapon.

Second of all, even if they will try to develop a nuclear bomb, they won't develop it all at once, so any potential war wouldn't be against everyone. And that war and its results would show any other nation with plans to build a nuclear bomb that Israel will not accept such a reality, and they will have to think very carefully if having a nuclear bomb is worth a war with Israel, that might prevent any other nation from creating a nuclear program altogether.

Third of all, it is not only Israel's interest to keep those nations nuclear weapons free due to instability in those nations, but also the interest of the US and Europe. So a coalition against such countries is more than possible and even likely. Also a reason why they might not want to pursue such a program.

Talking about the far future is pointless, as I don't know what technologies would exist, maybe Israel would posses such a robust air defense system that it wouldn't care about any nuclear weapons, who knows?
So my take is that in your view "Fear" will be the dominant factor that will be the long term strategy of Israel for security and that element will prevent the Israeli neighbors from taking the route to the bomb.Thank you for taking time to reply.
 
.
You're all coping

The US didn't suffer anything

All Iran did was fire missiles at cement, shoot down an Ukranian airliner with a bunch of Iranians and claim victory

Great predictable hollow post that ignores the aforegone facts mentioned. Tell yourself that, who cares. After all it's not as if such blanket statements carry weight with us.
 
.
my man coping

you guys fired missiles at cement lol

While reporting to your own people that 70 Americans were killed, when in fact no one even scratched a finger, damn coping so hard
The funny thing is that even Americans say that 200+ troops of them injured. THIS IS FIRST TIME SINCE WWWWW2 !
 
.
The funny thing is that even Americans say that 200+ troops of them injured. THIS IS FIRST TIME SINCE WWWWW2 !
While damage assessments were still underway, Iranian state-run Mehr News Agency wrote "over 80 American troops were killed and some 200 wounded", citing an informed source at the IRGC.[70] Later, a hoax Pentagon memo claiming 139 American troops were killed was spread on social media.[71] Mike Pregent, a former U.S. intelligence officer, attributed the forged memo to an IRGC disinformation attempt.[71]

Such liars lol, not even a single American soldier so much as was scratched
 
.
my man coping

you guys fired missiles at cement lol

While reporting to your own people that 70 Americans were killed, when in fact no one even scratched a finger, damn coping so hard

How come you don't comment on YT videos as much anymore? I used to remember seeing your name everywhere.
 
. .
I don’t really understand, Iran really did fail to give this poor guy better security as he deserved there’s a long line of incidents of people being killed off working for this programme. and in the manner he was murdered in his own country is really shocking and he won’t be the last either
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom