Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Recruit
we already saw "ruby" thunders in assembly pictures for Myanmar.Only 16 AC's for PAF or on the whole including export? But we were promised 24 examples for 2016 by PAC.
They also updated Block-1s to Block-2 configuration so that was added workload.Only 16 AC's for PAF or on the whole including export? But we were promised 24 examples for 2016 by PAC.
Only 16 AC's for PAF or on the whole including export? But we were promised 24 examples for 2016 by PAC.
That $25-30m unit cost is inclusive of the fighter and multi-year maintenance and logistics. The latter element (maintenance) would be absorbed within the PAF's annual budget, which will also see some freedom after retiring the F-7Ps. Moreover, many of the spare parts are also built locally thanks to the work share agreement, so the added maintenance cost of the JF-17 (in comparison to the F-7P) is even thinner. Basically, the upfront cost for the PAF is the cost of labour and materials. We already sunk the development cost via the partnership, so the flyaway cost is on paper. These are the advantages of having an in-house fighter.we already saw "ruby" thunders in assembly pictures for Myanmar.
possibly some were produced for nigeria as well
PAF budget is an issue as well even at 25-30 million a piece, total cost of 50 planes is 1.5 billion dollars. whole 250 order would be in excess of 7-8 billion dollars
What Block?
IIRC both chairman PAC and Air Chief said that the production will be increased from current 16 to 24 aircraft's in 2016 ."We were promised" ??? By whom
May be they have planned out the production rate so that there is no idle time before switching the production between block 2 to block 3. This may be due to delays in block-3 production.16 ready for duty. It doesn't mean more aren't built already, they could be in flight testing phase or last phases of final assembly
we already saw "ruby" thunders in assembly pictures for Myanmar.
possibly some were produced for nigeria as well
it s a 50-50-% patnership, so half of the profit goes to CAC as well, the other half goes back to PAF.That $25-30m unit cost is inclusive of the fighter and multi-year maintenance and logistics. The latter element (maintenance) would be absorbed within the PAF's annual budget, which will also see some freedom after retiring the F-7Ps. Moreover, many of the spare parts are also built locally thanks to the work share agreement, so the added maintenance cost of the JF-17 (in comparison to the F-7P) is even thinner. Basically, the upfront cost for the PAF is the cost of labour and materials. We already sunk the development cost via the partnership, so the flyaway cost is on paper. These are the advantages of having an in-house fighter.
The profit is only one part, and it's a very welcome addition. But the savings are in the fact that we can spend rupees to get JF-17 components produced, and in turn, employ Pakistanis to do it. Basically, defence expenditure becomes a stimulus for the local economy. This is where the savings comes in, regardless of the profit. Money going into JF-17 is largely still money going back into Pakistan.it s a 50-5-% patnership, so half of the profit goes to CAC as well, the other half goes back to PAF.
after this upgrade how many squadron will still be operating f 7p (not pg)