Pakistan Missile Milestones & Ranges

[Manticore]

Pakistan test-fires first nuclear-capable submarine cruise missile Babur-3
PTI | Updated: Jan 9, 2017, 09.58 PM IST
Highlights

1. Pakistan fired its first submarine-launched cruise missile on Monday, the military said
2. The Pakistani military said the Babur-3 missile was "capable of delivering various types of payloads

Source: https://defence.pk/threads/pakistan...m-submarine-ispr.471649/page-40#ixzz4VKfeOUg9

 

[Manticore]

Pakistan conducts successful test of SSM ABABEEL 1 (2200 Km) with MIRV technology
24 Jan 2017
Source: https://defence.pk/threads/pakistan...km-with-mirv-technology.474136/#ixzz4Wg5tT2hs

 

[LinuxNoob9]

Well done

 

[Syed_Adeel]

 

[HaiderAfan]

The recent U.S. sanctions on four Pakistani entities involved in the country's ballistic missile program have sparked significant reactions from Pakistan. The sanctions were imposed as part of efforts to curb the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their delivery systems, particularly focusing on Pakistan's long-range missile capabilities.

Key Details​

1. Entities Sanctioned:
   • The U.S. State Department announced sanctions against the National Development Complex (NDC), along with three Karachi-based companies: Akhtar and Sons Private Limited, Affiliates International, and Rockside Enterprise. These entities were accused of contributing to Pakistan's ballistic missile program, specifically the development of the Shaheen-series missiles.
2. Nature of the Sanctions:
   • The sanctions freeze any U.S. assets owned by these entities and prohibit American individuals and companies from engaging in business with them. This action is part of a broader strategy to address concerns over missile proliferation and enhance regional security.
3. Pakistan's Response:
   • Pakistan's foreign ministry condemned the sanctions as "unfortunate and biased," arguing that they could exacerbate military asymmetries in the region, particularly in relation to India. The ministry emphasized that such measures threaten regional stability and questioned the validity of the U.S. claims regarding proliferation activities.
4. Context of U.S.-Pakistan Relations:
   • The sanctions reflect ongoing tensions between the U.S. and Pakistan regarding military capabilities and nuclear proliferation. Experts suggest that these actions are also aimed at curbing technological exchanges between Pakistan and China, particularly in missile development.
5. Strategic Implications:
   • Analysts note that Pakistan's missile program is primarily designed to counter perceived threats from India, which has its own nuclear capabilities. The sanctions may further complicate U.S.-Pakistan relations, especially as Pakistan continues to develop its military technologies independently.

Conclusion​

The U.S. sanctions on Pakistani entities involved in missile development underscore the complexities of regional security dynamics and international non-proliferation efforts. As both nations navigate these challenges, the implications for strategic stability in South Asia remain significant, with potential repercussions for broader geopolitical relations involving China and other regional players.

 

[sidkhan2]

The recent U.S. sanctions on four Pakistani entities involved in the country's ballistic missile program have sparked significant reactions from Pakistan. The sanctions were imposed as part of efforts to curb the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their delivery systems, particularly focusing on Pakistan's long-range missile capabilities.

Key Details​

1. Entities Sanctioned:
   • The U.S. State Department announced sanctions against the National Development Complex (NDC), along with three Karachi-based companies: Akhtar and Sons Private Limited, Affiliates International, and Rockside Enterprise. These entities were accused of contributing to Pakistan's ballistic missile program, specifically the development of the Shaheen-series missiles.
2. Nature of the Sanctions:
   • The sanctions freeze any U.S. assets owned by these entities and prohibit American individuals and companies from engaging in business with them. This action is part of a broader strategy to address concerns over missile proliferation and enhance regional security.
3. Pakistan's Response:
   • Pakistan's foreign ministry condemned the sanctions as "unfortunate and biased," arguing that they could exacerbate military asymmetries in the region, particularly in relation to India. The ministry emphasized that such measures threaten regional stability and questioned the validity of the U.S. claims regarding proliferation activities.
4. Context of U.S.-Pakistan Relations:
   • The sanctions reflect ongoing tensions between the U.S. and Pakistan regarding military capabilities and nuclear proliferation. Experts suggest that these actions are also aimed at curbing technological exchanges between Pakistan and China, particularly in missile development.
5. Strategic Implications:
   • Analysts note that Pakistan's missile program is primarily designed to counter perceived threats from India, which has its own nuclear capabilities. The sanctions may further complicate U.S.-Pakistan relations, especially as Pakistan continues to develop its military technologies independently.

Conclusion​

The U.S. sanctions on Pakistani entities involved in missile development underscore the complexities of regional security dynamics and international non-proliferation efforts. As both nations navigate these challenges, the implications for strategic stability in South Asia remain significant, with potential repercussions for broader geopolitical relations involving China and other regional players.

View attachment 1035589

https://twitter.com/x/status/1869644028188520864